On May 25, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
I don't know who "Censorship Research Center" might be, but they
claim
to have a development project going for another encrypted proxy
service.
However, they say it will be free software, but *not* be open
source, so no
one can examine
On Tue, 25 May 2010 03:30:34 -0400 Justin Aplin
wrote:
>On May 25, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>
>> I don't know who "Censorship Research Center" might be, but they
>> claim
>> to have a development project going for another encrypted proxy
>> service.
>> However, they say
dear friends,
problem:
china is blocking TOR more and more strict,
I can't establish a TOR circuit even I updated bridges in config file
of torrc with info retrieved from https://bridges.torproject.org and
email replies from brid...@torproject.org.
this morning, I got some new bridges through a h
Hi,
I set up a preliminary homepage at http://www.torservers.net/
For the original discussion ("Tor Exit Node Sponsorship, looking for
partners") see http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/May-2010/msg00058.html
Basically it comes down to: I want to run another high bandwidth Tor
exit and I am loo
On 5/25/2010 4:59 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
You may well be assuming too much. It's not easy to know at this
point because it's still undocumented vaporware. I still think the
whole thing smacks of being a honeypot for gullible humans.
I'll admit I could be totally off base. But it's
On Tue, 25 May 2010 05:55:34 -0400 "Aplin, Justin M"
wrote:
>On 5/25/2010 4:59 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> You may well be assuming too much. It's not easy to know at this
>> point because it's still undocumented vaporware. I still think the
>> whole thing smacks of being a honeypot f
On 5/25/2010 6:22 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
"Proprietary" means the client companies pay for it, right? Which
means they are funding its development, right? Windows Server releases
are closed source, right? And client companies install and use it, right?
Now, none of that tells us "how ma
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:18:44PM +0800, for.tor.bri...@gmail.com wrote 1.3K
bytes in 36 lines about:
: china is blocking TOR more and more strict,
: I can't establish a TOR circuit even I updated bridges in config file
: of torrc with info retrieved from https://bridges.torproject.org and
: ema
The Haystack developer was interviewed for the BBC documentary The Virtual
Revolution - this episode I think:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2010/03/100301_the_virtual_revolution_part_two.shtml
and see
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8505645.stm
GD
Nathan Freitas wrote:
> Sorry, there is no version of Tor available for that class of Java phone
> currently. You need to upgrade to an Android, Windows Mobile, Nokia N900 or
> iPhone device.
>
> On May 24, 2010, at 12:20 PM, emigrant wrote:
>
>> sony ericsson k530i
>
> ***
I seem to recall that something called haystack, with a remarkably similar
webpage was the software and donations portal developed by @austinheap
during the Iran election. Since Heap's twitter is still linked from the
haystacknetworkcom page, I assume that this project remains the offspring of
that
Here's a quick post with images of Orbot running on a 7" Android tablet:
http://guardianproject.info/2010/05/25/tor-on-a-tablet/
This is a wifi-only device so it may be a better option for a truly secured
Android solution, than something with a closed-source Qualcomm chipset in it.
I plan to d
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 01:45 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> I don't know who "Censorship Research Center" might be, but they claim
> to have a development project going for another encrypted proxy service.
> However, they say it will be free software, but *not* be open source, so no
> one can examine
Ted Smith schrieb:
>
> I wonder if they'll sign the binary blobs they distribute; it would be
> very easy for the police in any country to distribute their own
> backdoored version (via sneakernet) and just arrest everyone who uses
> it.
I wonder why they're so exclusively focused on Iran. Their
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 20:28 +0200, Olaf Selke wrote:
> Ted Smith schrieb:
> >
> > I wonder if they'll sign the binary blobs they distribute; it would be
> > very easy for the police in any country to distribute their own
> > backdoored version (via sneakernet) and just arrest everyone who uses
> >
On Tue, 25 May 2010 13:33:23 -0400 Ted Smith
wrote:
>On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 01:45 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> I don't know who "Censorship Research Center" might be, but they claim
>> to have a development project going for another encrypted proxy service.
>> However, they say it will be fr
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 14:36 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2010 13:33:23 -0400 Ted Smith
> wrote:
> >On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 01:45 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
> >> I don't know who "Censorship Research Center" might be, but they claim
> >> to have a development project going for anothe
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:01:43PM -0400, Ted Smith wrote:
> > I couldn't figure
> > out why the author, Kurt Knutson of WGN TV, was so taken in by something
> > that
> > isn't even available yet and about which there is so little publicly
> > available
> > information.
> >
> Maybe Tor Project
> Hi,
I set up a preliminary homepage at
> http://www.torservers.net/
Your use of the Tor name and logo (and style) is deceptive. Why did you make
your disclaimer in fine print under the website? It looks like a copyright
notice. Many people won't bother to read it.
***
> because it's still undocumented vaporware. I still think the
whole
> thing smacks of being a honeypot for gullible humans.
They have gotten awesome news coverage in over a dozen big-name media outlets.
http://www.censorshipresearch.org/press/ I wonder why that is.
The whole project seems in
On May 25, 2010, at 6:59 PM, Curious Kid wrote:
Your use of the Tor name and logo (and style) is deceptive. Why did
you make your disclaimer in fine print under the website? It looks
like a copyright notice. Many people won't bother to read it.
Should he have to? The only place I see Tor's
>
> Your use of the
> Tor name and logo (and style) is deceptive. Why did you make your disclaimer
> in
> fine print under the website? It looks like a copyright notice. Many people
> won't bother to read it.
Should he have to? The only place I see Tor's
Yes, of course it should be obvious
On 5/25/2010 7:39 PM, Curious Kid wrote:
Yes, of course it should be obvious that it is not sponsored by The Tor Project.
Maybe it's just me, then. I tend to assume that anything not on the
official website isn't sponsored by the official project, unless they
make a point of explicitly sa
Thus spake Moritz Bartl (t...@wiredwings.com):
> I set up a preliminary homepage at http://www.torservers.net/
>
> For the original discussion ("Tor Exit Node Sponsorship, looking for
> partners") see http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/May-2010/msg00058.html
>
> Basically it comes down to: I want
Hi,
Your use of the Tor name and logo (and style) is deceptive.
I take it you didn't see the favicon. Look again.
Fair enough, that is a tad misleading.
Yes, I have used the Tor logo in several places. For one, I am not a
graphics designer. Secondly, I think my usage (it its context) is
ne
Thus spake Moritz Bartl (t...@wiredwings.com):
> Let's look at what the Tor website has to say about its logo:
> https://www.torproject.org/trademark-faq.html.en
>
> "If you're making non-commercial use of Tor software, you may also use
> the Tor onion logo (as an illustration, not as a brand fo
Hi Mike,
Thank you for your input. I agree with all you say, and to some degree
it shows that it is yet unclear (from the site) what exactly I want to
offer. I now think it might have been better to not make it public
before getting that message transported, but I haven't published it
anywher
Mike and Moritz,
Would you both *please* stop posting each message to multiple lists?
Thanks much.
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu
Hi Mike,
"If you're making non-commercial use of Tor software, you may also use
the Tor onion logo (as an illustration, not as a brand for your
products)."
One of the sticky issues with trademark protection though is that if
you do not defend your mark in all applicable cases, you lose the
righ
Hi Scott,
>Mike and Moritz,
> Would you both *please* stop posting each message to multiple >lists?
>Thanks much.
I have only posted the initial annoucement to both lists.
--
Moritz Bartl
GPG 0xED2E9B44
http://www.torservers.net/
*
Cool Story, bro.
Thus spake Scott Bennett (benn...@cs.niu.edu):
> Mike and Moritz,
> Would you both *please* stop posting each message to multiple lists?
> Thanks much.
--
Mike Perry
Mad Computer Scientist
fscked.org evil labs
pgpwX5jpdIrXf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Dear all,
My tor have a error,this is the message log:
[Warning] Problem bootstrapping. Stuck at 10%: Finishing handshake with
directory server. (Socket is not connected [WSAENOTCONN ]; NOROUTE; count 4;
recommendation warn)
I have already set the bridges. pls help me,thanks.
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:59:48PM +, tor-ad...@orionjurinform.com wrote
0.8K bytes in 18 lines about:
: Does a Tor-version for WM exist? I thought that such tor-version didn't
: exist.
It doesn't exist in binary form. However, thanks to a volunteer, we
just committed some code to support it
and...@torproject.org wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:59:48PM +, tor-ad...@orionjurinform.com wrote
> 0.8K bytes in 18 lines about:
> : Does a Tor-version for WM exist? I thought that such tor-version didn't
> : exist.
>
> It doesn't exist in binary form. However, thanks to a volunteer,
34 matches
Mail list logo
