Hi,
On 13.06.2010 23:43, andrew wrote:
>> Then of course he already mentioned a couple of times that he's not in
>> the USA, so even if you were a lawyer he shouldn't take your advice ;)
> Right. I read the thread too. He is not, but his service and the
> underlying provider are in the USA.
Tha
Hi
I am running the exit-node tor-readme.spamt.net. My provider,
server4you, keeps getting abuse reports from shadowserver.org. According
to the abuse service they are running honeynets which record activity
comming from my exit-node's IP.
I have tried to communicate directly with shadowserver.or
> I am running the exit-node tor-readme.spamt.net. My provider,
> server4you, keeps getting abuse reports from shadowserver.org. According
> to the abuse service they are running honeynets which record activity
> comming from my exit-node's IP.
>
> I have tried to communicate directly with shadowse
>
> Probably because your exit node is being used to do something that
> warrants an abuse report.
>
Maybe, but if this shadowserver site is being incommunicado then I wouldn't
put much confidence in their findings.
Stop the activity on your exit node that is causing them to lodge reports?
>
Ver
Am 14.06.2010 16:02, schrieb alex-...@copton.net:
Hi
I am running the exit-node tor-readme.spamt.net. My provider,
server4you, keeps getting abuse reports from shadowserver.org. According
to the abuse service they are running honeynets which record activity
comming from my exit-node's IP.
I hav
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:03 PM, Damian Johnson wrote:
>> Probably because your exit node is being used to do something that
>> warrants an abuse report.
>
> Maybe, but if this shadowserver site is being incommunicado then I wouldn't
> put much confidence in their findings.
FWIW, Shadowserver hav
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:01:53PM +0200, kuhkatz wrote:
> i assume you might block these server via the exit-rules of your server.
Maybe I am wrong, but if the servers' IP addresses where publicly known,
they would not be honeypots, would they?
How would you block connections to Shadowserver's
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:03 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 09:01:53PM +0200, kuhkatz wrote:
>> i assume you might block these server via the exit-rules of your server.
>
> Maybe I am wrong, but if the servers' IP addresses where publicly known,
> they would not be honeypots, would they?
>
On 06/14/10 10:02, alex-...@copton.net wrote:
> I am running the exit-node tor-readme.spamt.net.
Thank You tor-readme.spamt.net, for your generous contribution to tor!!!
> My provider, server4you, keeps getting abuse reports from
> shadowserver.org. According to the abuse service they are runni
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:26:59PM +0100, Al MailingList wrote:
> > How would you block connections to Shadowserver's honeypots?
>
> Why would you want to do that? The point is someone is using an exit
> node for abuse. If you just prevent abuse to a honey pot, you are just
> covering up the probl
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 05:36:02PM -0400, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
> What, specifically, are they tracking to your IP? This unspecific
> complaint could be anything from an innocent series of pings, to an out
> and out stream from metasploit!?
I don't really know. I have no direct communication, only m
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:27 PM, wrote:
> Last thing was that their honeypots recorded access of an IRC-Bot to a
> "Command & Control Server" from which it got orders to launch a
> DDos-attack. First, I wonder why this bot contacts their honeypots and
> gets new commands from them. And second, th
On 06/14/10 18:52, John Brooks wrote:
[]
>> And second, the exit policy of my node does not allow
>> IRC.
>>
>> For me this makes no sense at all.
>>
>
> From my experience, shadowserver has a habit of being overzealous
> like this. I've never dealt with them in the context of Tor, but I
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
