Over on the TLS WG mailing list at IETF there is some debate over
the NPN (Next Protocol Negotation) TLS extension, which originated
outside of TLS WG but is now starting to be brought up there for
standardization. The thread starts at
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.comwrote:
This is neither fair nor reasonable.
When Wikimedia broke into the top _10_ most popular sites, with
something like 100 million unique viewers in a month the annual income
was comparable to the tor project. It only
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 09:05:27 -0700
Julie C ju...@h-ck.ca wrote:
But from an organizational, big picture view, I think it is clearly time for
them to bring in some evangelical fundraisers to move the Project forward.
There is a great base to build on. There is a great story to tell. But think
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 12:09:29 -0700
Robert Ransom rransom.8...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, remember that Tor's opponents would put much more effort into
blocking Tor if it were heavily promoted in the Western media. (China
and Iran are not Tor's only opponents -- here in the US, misguided
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Robert Ransom rransom.8...@gmail.comwrote:
What do you expect the Tor Project to do with zillions of dollars?
Using donated funds to operate more relays, bridges, and exit nodes
won't help much -- Tor nodes need to be dispersed among as many
different
Thus spake Seth David Schoen (sch...@eff.org):
Much of the debate centers around the idea that NPN will make it
harder for network operators to know what protocols users are using
over TLS and hence to block particular protocols while permitting
others. One of the proponents (Adam Langley,
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:05:27AM -0700, Julie C wrote:
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:31 PM, Gregory Maxwell gmaxw...@gmail.comwrote:
This is neither fair nor reasonable.
When Wikimedia broke into the top _10_ most popular sites, with
something like 100 million unique viewers in a month
If one goes to, for example, http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/ one can see
many nodes, all called Unnamed. How can such nodes be specifically
referred to if one is using StrictExitNodes =1?
Thanks.
On 17 August 2010 17:47, Matthew pump...@cotse.net wrote:
How can... nodes be specifically referred to...?
Refer to the nodes by their unique fingerprints;.
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Seth David Schoen sch...@eff.org wrote:
[snip]
I'm tempted to reply pointing out that _all_ uses of TLS represent
at least potential support for a threat model in which a network
operator is the adversary whom users are trying to defend against.
So there's not
Where I can find it for pointing out MyFamily in /etc/torrc ?
I find only my node fingerprint.
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body.
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 01:20:25 +
Orionjur Tor-admin tor-ad...@orionjurinform.com wrote:
Where I can find it for pointing out MyFamily in /etc/torrc ?
I find only my node fingerprint.
That's your keyid, or look for the log message on start:
[notice] Your Tor server's identity key fingerprint
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 20:32:13 -0700
Julie C ju...@h-ck.ca wrote:
First off, your enthusiasm and questioning our decisions is great and
encouraged. Will you help us?
The larger threat that I see is the Tor Project is absolutely ...
dare I say it? ... PATHETIC AT MARKETING ITSELF.
Yes, this is
13 matches
Mail list logo
