On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 10:53:48PM -0600, Jim wrote:
> I connect to the Internet with dialup. I have been successfully using
> Tor clients for 4+ years. One of the issues with using Tor over a slow
> connection is the amount of time it takes to update the information
> about the network whe
Mike Perry wrote:
Actually there are several large-userbase companies that want to
include Tor by default in their product, either as a client, a relay,
or a bridge. Unfortunately, the only answer we have for them in the
immediate term is "For the love of goddess don't do that, you'll
destroy To
> > https://anonymous-proxy-servers.net/en/anontest
> As I understand it, Polipo can't scrub the headers of an HTTPS request,
Nothing in the open source field can do so yet afaik.
To do it, a shim needs to be coded and placed between the application and Tor.
user <-> browser <-> [optional tool]
For the most part, anything involving HTTPS, needs to be taken care of
in the browser itself. Properly-configured extensions help a lot here.
Also, that adds an extra layer of protection onto normal HTTP stuff,
too. The more, the merrier...
F. Fox
On 8/21/10, Robert Ransom wrote:
(snip)
As
It certainly sounds interesting. Full VM environments not only cause
system resource overhead, but maintenance overhead, too (that's always
been my biggest gripe about them).
F. Fox
On 08/21/2010 05:55 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
(snip)
Has anyone looked into using the SELINUX sandbox
(http://
Greetings, I've searched my copy of the lists and can't find any
discussion of this. If there has been, please direct me to it.
I think it's obvious that the best way of using tor is running your
torrified apps in a VM which can only access the outside world via
TOR. This provides the highest prot
On 8/19/10, Seth David Schoen wrote:
Exactly!
Even if any particular anon system was comprimiseable, why would
any comprimising organization [save the full disclosure types] wish
to play their trump card in public??? If any anon system is comprimisable,
far better to listen in, under the convenie
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 4:13 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
>
> Actually there are several large-userbase companies that want to
> include Tor by default in their product, either as a client, a relay,
> or a bridge. Unfortunately, the only answer we have for them in the
> immediate term is "For the love
Thus spake Al MailingList (alpal.mailingl...@gmail.com):
> > And what about Microsoft? I think someone should be targeting/lobbying them
> > to include a Tor client and default bridge relay in every version of Windows
> > 8 or 9. Find out what it would take to get them to do this,
>
> Sorry, what
> And what about Microsoft? I think someone should be targeting/lobbying them
> to include a Tor client and default bridge relay in every version of Windows
> 8 or 9. Find out what it would take to get them to do this,
Sorry, what's in this for Microsoft? Being a good corporate citizen?
>From a bu
10 matches
Mail list logo
