Thus spake Daniel Franganillo (dani...@dilmun.ls.fi.upm.es):
> Our ISP wont say nothing about their filters (It seems to be a Top Secret
> issue :P). As I said before there's no problem reported at debug.log except
> for the frequent:
>
> [debug] TLS error: unexpected close while reading (SSL_S
On 03.12.2010 08:40, Daniel Franganillo wrote:
>
> Well, im not asking for help to run a Tor relay, I did it for more than
> a year without problems. Im asking for help to gather intel so I can
> make an statement to our ISP (I work at a Dept. in a univeristy) to
> unblock Tor.
why don't you ask
Actually, let's break this thread off into a new one with new subject, too.
Sorry about the double-post. Just want to make sure this hits the
search engines.
Thus spake Daniel Franganillo (dani...@dilmun.ls.fi.upm.es):
> Our ISP wont say nothing about their filters (It seems to be a Top Secret
Hey again:
i am getting this new message in forefox:
Torbutton Sandbox evaluation failed. Date hooks not applied!
Any clues?
El 03/12/10 09:18, Olaf Selke escribió:
On 03.12.2010 08:40, Daniel Franganillo wrote:
Well, im not asking for help to run a Tor relay, I did it for more than
a year without problems. Im asking for help to gather intel so I can
make an statement to our ISP (I work at a Dept. in a univeristy) to
El 03/12/10 09:17, Mike Perry escribió:
Actually, let's break this thread off into a new one with new subject, too.
Sorry about the double-post. Just want to make sure this hits the
search engines.
Thus spake Daniel Franganillo (dani...@dilmun.ls.fi.upm.es):
Our ISP wont say nothing about the
On 03.12.2010 11:22, Daniel Franganillo wrote:
> El 03/12/10 09:18, Olaf Selke escribió:
>
>> why don't you ask them?
> Well, you know, network administrators are one species by themself. My
> University spent almost 1M€ (yeah, one million) in a network filtering
> infrastructure and we're still w
Hi,
On 03.12.2010 13:12, Olaf Selke wrote:
> At least my relay holds a couple of connections to Cryptolab.
We (torservers) do, too. About the same amount of connections.
Moritz
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@tor
I have tried Tor Portable on both Windows XP and Ubuntu. On both
platform, the included extension "HTTPS-Everywhere" does not work at
all, ie. no rules for any site like Facebook. Is this behavior
expected?
Thanks for any answer to my query!
On Dec 3, 2010, at 3:14 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
[snip]
Nope. Transfer rates are equally ridiculous. Tried in windows, same.
[/snip]
Out of curiosity, how long are you letting these tests run for? My
nodes generally take a full 2 or 3 days to get up to full capacity,
and even then, traffic thr
On Dec 3, 2010, at 8:22 AM, Koh Choon Lin wrote:
I have tried Tor Portable on both Windows XP and Ubuntu. On both
platform, the included extension "HTTPS-Everywhere" does not work at
all, ie. no rules for any site like Facebook. Is this behavior
expected?
I see this as well in the 1.3.13 Brows
Damian Johnson wrote:
> The lsof command issued by arm [1] is:
> lsof -nPi | grep "\s*.*(ESTABLISHED)"
>
> I'd be happy to work with you to provide a fix, if you'd like. Once
> upon a time I tried to use VMs to troubleshoot FreeBSD and Gentoo
> issues (thus far they're the only platforms to give
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Fabian Keil wrote:
- Be available to test a potential fix.
If you're up for that then I'm glad to have the help! Lets take
further discussion of this off the list. I don't think this is
generally of interest to the rest of the tor community. -Damian
It's at least interest
Perfect! I'll try to provide a fix for you to test later today or tomorrow.
> I intent to try Arm in the future. Are you aware of anyone working on a port?
Nope. Jesse just finished an ebuild for Gentoo:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=341731
and I'm working with Peter on a deb. But thus
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 08:34:46PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Damian Johnson wrote:
>
> > The lsof command issued by arm [1] is:
> > lsof -nPi | grep "\s*.*(ESTABLISHED)"
> > What I'll need from you is the following:
> > - A command that, when executed as the tor user, produces connection
>
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Hans Schnehl wrote:
Sorry for jumping in , but please notice the above command might not
not work on all versions of FBSD, at least it doesn't on a 7-Stable jail.
Maybe the following just produces a similar sufficient output:
_...@ato# id
uid=256(_tor) gid=256(_tor) grou
On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 09:35:39PM +, John Case wrote:
>
> On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Hans Schnehl wrote:
>
> > Sorry for jumping in , but please notice the above command might not
> > not work on all versions of FBSD, at least it doesn't on a 7-Stable jail.
> >
Not working refers to Fabian's use
On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Hans Schnehl wrote:
specifically:
ps -Al
after polling for lsof and a foreach loop, doesn't work ?
I know it's not elegant, but it appeared to me that:
lsof + ps -Al
would work ... especially if the system in question is doing little (or
nothing) other than Tor ...
I
I have the above record in '/var/tor/log' on my exit-node.
What it can mean?!
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
19 matches
Mail list logo
