Somedays ago my aptitude authomatically installed the new Tor version
'0.2.1.29-1~~lenny+1' from http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org
Today it have replaced it to such version 'http://security.debian.org'
Why? Is it normal?
My /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ lenny mai
* wirelesssnow...@safe-mail.net [2011:01:17
22:46 -0500]:
> *BOTH* files are *EXACTLY* the *SAME*! They are the public key from
> the would be signer, but the .asc files are NOT the correctly signed
> files from the signer's public key. The .asc files are WORTHLESS and
> gpg issues an error if y
Point 1: Binaries (DEBs/RPMs) are NOT correctly signed!
Demonstration of point 1:
Download a current Tor binary (rpm or deb file) from Tor's official
repositories. Next, download the RPM-GPG-KEY-torproject.org file. Finally,
download the .asc file for the Tor binary version you've downloaded.
@@
Point 1: Binaries (DEBs/RPMs) are NOT correctly signed!
@@
Demonstration of point 1:
Download a current Tor binary (rpm or deb file) from Tor's official
repositories. Next, download the RPM-GPG-KEY
Hi,
travis+ml-tor-t...@subspacefield.org wrote (17 Jan 2011 23:55:16 GMT) :
> I am unsure of whether it should be in the debian repo, since the
> dependencies aren't even in there yet.
What are the missing dependencies? (I have not had a single look at
your package yet, sorry.)
> However, I cou
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 12:21:56 -0800
travis+ml-tor-t...@subspacefield.org wrote:
> > The real answer is to fix firefox so it doesn't need a proxy
> > between it and Tor. We patch firefox to do just this in the osx
> > and linux tor browser bundles. Polipo was a fine kludge until
> > either we start
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 10:42:18PM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> > So how do I make people aware of the option?
>
> In my humble opinion your package shall be pushed to Debian and Ubuntu
> (or at least to deb.torproject.org) before user awareness is the top
> priority. Rationale: I'm not a fan of reco
Hi,
For the foundation meeting, it is required that all founding members to
physically meet. So will be the yearly members meeting. At the moment
our goal is to gather all interested German exit operators. Everyone who
cannot come to the initial discussion is well invited to *join* the
association
I doubt that I will be able to get to dresden, but is there a chance of some
sort of video conference? I like the idea of putting together so sort
of official group behind the tor exit node operators. There are a ton of
things that this could encompass, and we could roll up a
few different efforts
Hi,
travis+ml-tor-t...@subspacefield.org wrote (17 Jan 2011 20:21:56 GMT) :
> So, now I've brought the level of effort down to one minute or less,
> and the level of thought down to something you can do while drunk
> and sleep-deprived, since there's no decisions required.
Thank you. This is much
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:03:58AM -0500, and...@torproject.org wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 03:21:22PM -0800,
> travis+ml-tor-t...@subspacefield.org wrote 15K bytes in 259 lines about:
> There has been much discussion over a combined tor and polipo package,
> as well as a vidalia-tor-polipo p
Hi,
[ Crossposted to or-talk; if you want to stay informed about
torservers.net or discuss specifics, please subscribe to our list:
http://www.freelists.org/list/torservers ]
* SOFTLAYER/100TB:
A few days ago Softlayer nullrouted ONE of our exit IPs, but the other
IPs are still up. So much for th
12 matches
Mail list logo
