On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 07:44:57AM -0500, hi...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> Most hidden services use the standard port 80, like this:
> address.onion
> While other services are like this:
> address.onion:8080
>
> What do you gain by doing that?
Not much at all, as far as I can tell.
Maybe they're doi
On 01/02/11 15:45, Aplin, Justin M wrote:
> On 1/25/2011 1:25 PM, Jerzy Ćogiewa wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> Is it possible to have Torbutton activate Tor only on specified tabs and not
>> others? It would make Tor much more useful.
>
> So far this is not possible, no. There is an ugly, but workable,
>
On 2/4/2011 6:15 PM, Curious Kid wrote:
You seem to have the misconception that Tor only uses one circuit at any given
time, ...
Tor builds several circuits that you can use at any given time. I think three is
default...
I understood there were several circuits for nodes in the middle, but
d
Hi,
>>> experimental methods like key and state storage in CPU cache lines
>>> may hold promise.
>>
>> There were discussions about this when the cold boot attack was
>> disclosed, and it didn't appears to be such a good solution [3].
>> But maybe you're talking about another method.
As far as I'
Most hidden services use the standard port 80, like this:
address.onion
While other services are like this:
address.onion:8080
What do you gain by doing that?
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
uns
exit nodes are the tor nodes from which your traffic leaves the tor network
, the other nodes are the ones through which your traffic is bounced to
achieve anonimity .
https://www.torproject.org/about/overview.html.en Very well illustrated , &
lucid.
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 1:28 PM, Zaher F. wrot
2011/2/5 coderman :
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:08 AM, morphium wrote:
>>...
>> Oh and yes, they took only my hardware @ home, not the Server in the
>> data center that actually DID run Tor and that the "bad" IP belonged
>> to.
>
> this is interesting.
>
> just to clarify: you had traffic of intere
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:08 AM, morphium wrote:
>...
> Oh and yes, they took only my hardware @ home, not the Server in the
> data center that actually DID run Tor and that the "bad" IP belonged
> to.
this is interesting.
just to clarify: you had traffic of interest from a dedicated server
in a
8 matches
Mail list logo