--- Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The providers in the U.S. are not at the forefront, obviously. Unlike
> France, Japan, etc., an intermediate-speed, asymmetric model is used for
> residential service in the U.S. If you have, say, $1200/month to blow, you
> can get a T3 line a
--- Mike Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My apologies. The statement has been corrected.
Thank you!
> My guess is your problems arise from this issue being the case with
> nsIProtocolProxyFilter, right?
Yes. Mapping nsIURI instances to tabs (when applicable) is the heart of the
problem.
--- Eric C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Does anybody know of any free, public (or semi-public) proxies that I can use?
>
> A google search returned some sites but a lot of the proxies listed
> are not working, although I can ping them.
Eric,
I compiled some lists here:
http://fox
>Christian Biesinger and Michael Vincent Van Rantwijk had some ideas which
> eventually panned out.
I meant to write *did not* pan out.
Eric
Hello,
I am the FoxyProxy Firefox extension author.
At https://torbutton.torproject.org/dev/, Scott Squires & Mike Perry write:
FoxyProxy
"[...] So far the author has expressed no interest in implementing
[proxy-per-tab] ability."
This statement is patently false. I have repeatedly gone on rec
Hi,How can I configure torrc such that every request goes through a different exit node (i.e., I get a different IP address for each request)? This isn't a browser so I'm not able to control keep-alive unless I do at the OS level (is there a way to do that on Windows?)Thanks,eric
Hello,
I know there were (are?) a lot of Tor users who use FoxyProxy, the Firefox
proxy extension. I wanted to announce that FoxyProxy 2.0 was released on
Saturday. It includes lots of new features and some bug fixes.
http://foxyproxy.mozdev.org/
Best regards,
Eric Jung
U.K. Government to force handover of encryption keys
http://news.zdnet.co.uk/0,39020330,39269746,00.htm
--- Matej Kovacic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is interesting, because we are talking about letters from/to
> prison
> and not letters of free innocent citizens. If Court found cenzorship
> of
> prisonner's writings (to his wife and international institutuions)
> illegal, then restrictions to
--- Michael Holstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> AFIK, there is no data remanence problem with DRAM
Not apparently. I sent one of these links earlier in this thread IIRC.
These papers are by Peter Gutman himself.
"7. Methods of Recovery for Data stored in Random-Access Memory"
"8. Erasure of Da
onfinement (United States
v. Carpenter, 91 F.3d 1282, 1283 (9th Cir. 1996)), the requirement that
a jury trial be granted in criminal contempt cases involving sentences
over six months in jail acts as a check on this power." 67-79
--- Mike Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thus sp
Ringo,
You would have had an idea if you followed and read any of the links I
sent previously.
--- Ringo Kamens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree with you about the hops. Thanks for posting the info about
> hard
> drives. I had no idea.
>
> On Sun May 14 21:58:42 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
> > Before they realise that they need a key you can microwave the
> token.
> > You can then surrender it when required and still meet your legal
> > obligations... 'It must have been static damage officer...you need
> to
> > be more careful with my equipment'
>
> Which in the UK at least could l
--- Mike Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A US judge exercising proper
> dilligence should be able to realize that the search was not likely
> to
> produce relevant evidence to the case in question, or so one would
> hope.
LOL. Where have you been for the past 6 months with regards to the Bush
FWIW, I've bought a number of hard drives from ebay. It's pretty
amazing the sensitive data I could recover from them with the simplest
of freeware. Luckily for them, I'm a good person. A simple wipe with
DBAN would have prevented all that. Oh well.
--- Landorin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
n't get it. Why buy a new one anyway? From what I know, any
> and
> > > every data will be lost if you format your hardisk with a safe
> method
> > > (can't remember the name right now but that method keeps writing
> > > random data to your entire hard
e right now but that method keeps writing
> > random data to your entire hardisk to overwrite existing files and
> it
> > does it for 10 times or more to ensure all old data is lost)?
> >
> > Sincerely,
> > Landorin
> >
> >
> > Eric H. Jung schrieb:
If you can't afford a new hard drive, be sure to wipe it using DBAN
http://dban.sourceforge.net/
(open-source, free)
--- Ringo Kamens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chances are it would be internal and couldn't hold much data. I
> really think
> you should sell your rig and buy a used one that's c
I remember reading that about JAP.
Given the recent enlightenments about the US National Security Agency's
illegal activities (gathering millions of telephone records from
average citizens, etc), what is the technical feasibility of the NSA or
other governmentt organizations establishing modified
Nevermind. I forgot about URL parameters.
--- "Eric H. Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to reply to this thread but long ago deleted it:
> http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Apr-2006/msg00130.html
>
> To anyone concerned about the pos
Hi,
I wanted to reply to this thread but long ago deleted it:
http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Apr-2006/msg00130.html
To anyone concerned about the possibility of privacy leaks by using
FoxyProxy with Tor, I'd like your feedback about this:
Someone suggested an idea which might alleviate these (
Perhaps this has already been made clear to others, but it's becoming
more apparent to me that Torpark is an installer/configuration script.
IOW, there *is* no other source code unique to Torpark except the NSI
installation script. Perhaps when people download the tarball and see
only the NSI and a
n proxy now... It looks to be a sync problem with the
> enabling of foxyproxy and the use of the home-page upon startup.
>
> I am using an updated Dapper with Firefox 1.5.0.2
>
> Best of luck with the testing! This is not a problem for me now that
> I
> know about it, but i
Hi Lasse,
Very strange. I tested this thoroughly so I don't know why you're
seeing different results. Are you sure the page isn't cached in Firefox
already?
Thanks,
Eric
--- Lasse �verlier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> This is an important feature announcement in an otherwise
It would be quite trivial to write a Firefox extension which prevents
Javascript from writing and/or reading cookies.
--- ygrek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Mike,
>
> > I regularly purge tons of cookies from doubleclick, informit,
> > googlesyndication, ad nauseum that have been collecte
ipe for some of the problems both of you describe, no?
--- "Eric H. Jung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Michaels,
>
> I apologize for the delayed reply. Please don't interpret the delay
> as
> a lack of interest--it surely isn't.
>
> Quo
Hello Michaels,
I apologize for the delayed reply. Please don't interpret the delay as
a lack of interest--it surely isn't.
Quoting Mike Perry:
>Just clearing cookies every time there is a switch is not enough if
>there is an automatic Tor filter in place.
>The problem is that yahoo can custom-g
Hi Michael,
Now that I understand I2P, perhaps you can respond to the rest of my email?
The problem you identify does not seem to be any more or less exacerbated by
FoxyProxy; the
problem, if I understand correctly, exists regardless of whether not one uses
FoxyProxy.
So when you say "If you c
tensions I could find)
* Lots more
I hope you enjoy it. I look forward to your comments.
Sincerely,
Eric H. Jung
29 matches
Mail list logo
