Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What must I do, or (better!) is there a rpm already for centOS??
Apparently, you don't have any development tools.
"yum install libevent-devel" should pull in everything you need to
build Tor.
Regards
Marco
Hi,
TOR Admin (gpfTOR1) wrote:
I will try it for email (fon, mobile and sms may be nearly like this):
For mobile calls and SMS messages, the cell location of the caller/
sender at the beginning of the call must be recorded.
Pretty ugly, IMHO.
Marco
Hi,
Eugen Leitl wrote:
Am I missing something?
This passage, perhaps?
In the case of respectable companies offering this kind of service
> users create their secret keys locally; the CA is only sent the
> certificate application, a signed copy of which it then sends back.
That's _exactly_ wha
Hi,
BlueStar88 wrote:
> What's about the StartCom-side private key generation issue?
>
>http://www.heise.de/english/newsticker/news/56808
>
> Tried yesterday, they're still doing it this way.
> Not the best approach, I think.
Err... just create your own secret key and a certificate request
(f
Hi,
JT wrote:
The question is where I can find the public key to verify them? I
searched the homepage for a public key but I couldn't find any.
The files are signed by 0x31B0974B - this key can be found on
the usual key servers.
http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x3B9D093F31B0
Hi,
Karsten N. wrote:
Any ideas to use SSL encryption for the proxy?
Have a look at pound (http://www.apsis.ch/pound/)
Marco
Hi,
halesnil wrote:
Onion History Executive Summary in Hidden Wiki said traffic coming back
from exit node to user was in clear text. Is this still true, or out of
date?
Are you talking about the connection between the exit node and the
destination host, or about the connection between you as
Hi,
Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
How do you force firefox to "keepalive" the connections?
Have a look at the network.http.pipelining options on the
about:config page.
I have set all three booleans to true and maxrequests to 8.
Marco
Hi,
Fabian Keil wrote:
Firefox on the Windows Virtual Machine won't connect to the net. I've
configured it to use the Proxy settings recommended on the web page
(Proxy at 127.0.0.1/port 8118/Socks 5). All I get is a message that the
proxy is refusing connections. How do I get round this, please?
Hi,
David O Smith wrote:
Firefox on the Windows Virtual Machine won't connect to the net. I've
configured it to use the Proxy settings recommended on the web page
(Proxy at 127.0.0.1/port 8118/Socks 5). All I get is a message that the
proxy is refusing connections. How do I get round this, pleas
Hi Pascal,
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 07:52:24PM +0200, pascal levasseur wrote:
> - tor administrators can use any port for their ORport and DIRport;
Yes.
> - as a consequence another tor server can ask my tor server to set-up a
> OR or DIR link with it using any port;
Yes.
> - so if my tor server
Hi Pascal,
> I would like to understand why my tor server (clearstream) try to reach
> the following servers on non usual tor ports ports (80, 443, 9001,
> 9030) ?
The or port can be freely configured... 80, 443 et al. are just
the most used ones.
> server IP port
> 12.30.222.10 9876
See htt
Hi,
4non ym0us wrote:
I'm aware of this and believe that it's a lot easier to convince my
webhost, if it comes down to it, to not block TOR exit nodes which
many does not appear to be accepting SMTP anyway, compared to if my
IPs are being used for massive spammage.
I think this is the main reas
13 matches
Mail list logo
