On 2007-02-21 21:42, BlueStar88 wrote:
> You should read this:
>
> http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#head-f3a370dd3c42d82a180f3f1d070f94906f4eddea
I've read this wiki article, but didn't find any final answer. It says:
"Unfortunately, since Tor currently requires you to be ab
On 2007-02-21 21:25, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
> From a pragmatic point of view that would also mean that you wouldn't
> be able to log in from remote if TOR gobbles up all sockets.
It's not as bad as that, as the ssh daemon is listening all the time and
therefor already has its socket.
> Gee,
Hi,
I have rented a small v-server where I can spare about 400GB of
bandwidth per month for Tor. Unfortunately, the number of open TCP
sockets is limited to 128 and the operator is not willing to change
that. (Any good reason why they wouldn't?). So what I'm doing now is
running Tor as a non-exit
3 matches
Mail list logo
