Nick Mathewson schrieb:
It's your server. But the last time I looked, the SORBS Tor list
tried to include _all_ Tor servers, not just the ones that are
configured to relay SMTP.
Not all Tor servers are listed in SORBS. I believe, the listing in
SORBS depends not on SMTP exit rules. The listed
Hi onion-folks,
shinjiru is under pressure of spamhaus.org and others, to close
malware infected servers. I know about problems of no-tor-servers,
which have to migrate, because some IP-ranges of shinjiru were blocked
by SORBS and spamhaus.org. So shinjiru is closing all servers, which
seems to
Olaf Selke schrieb:
TOR-Admin (gpfTOR1) wrote:
But first I hope, we do not have to log!!!
although I still believe data retention doesn't apply to tor operators, I
would rather shut
down my node than equipping it with lawful interception functionality.
Full ack! But at the moment I do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Experten erwarten durch die Neuregelung der
Telekommunikationsüberwachung gravierende Auswirkungen auf
Anonymisierungsdienste. 180 von 200 deutschen TOR-Servern gehen
offline, kündigte Karsten Neß an, der für die Gesellschaft zur
Förderung angewandter Informatik[4]
Hi onion guys,
we want to write about a few points of the European Cybercrime
Convention, which became real by law in Germany last time.
Sorry - we didnt read the or-talk very carefully last time. May be, it
was always discussed here.
By the European Cybercrime Convention anon servers are
kazaam schrieb:
Hi,
because in germany fascist laws will force tor-nodes to log their connections
I'm looking for a way to blog german tor-nodes.
I believe, the GUI TorK can blog all nodes of a country, but this way is
not a solution.
Thomas Hluchnik schrieb:
Has anyone ever tried to speak with the guys from SPIEGEL, FAZ, Sueddeutsche
and so on that they drive own tor nodes? This would be good PR for tor.
Heise and ZEIT will not run tor node, I asked them 2 month ago. May be,
they will change the opinion next time.
The
Alexander W. Janssen schrieb:
Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 01:19 +0100 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[... Privacy Foundation ...]
Ich habe gerade eine Anfrage an die Privacy Foundation geschickt und sie
gebeten, mir zur erklären, was folgender Passus[1] bedeutet:
In Ausnahmefällen bietet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mirko,
1: by German law a Tor node admin is something like an access provider.
You are not responsible for your traffic. If the court have only an IP
address and you have a tor status log, they have nothing.
2: Tor is a legal service in Germany
Matej Kovacic schrieb:
I agree. But what about building Tor server and client into popular P2P
clients?
There is a project to spread out Tor by pre-configured
DSL-modem/WLAN-router.
http://wiki.freunde-der-freiheit.de/index.php/TOR-Campaign
They have a mailing list. I do not know, if a router
Our measurement for space of log data:
(because there was a question for it)
server traffic (mean): 2.000 KB/s
log data for one week: 200 GByte
after remove of some useless strings: 120 GByte
compressed and encrypted: 20 GByte
for 26 weeks: approx. 500 GByte
This is very much for our
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
The cert doesn't automatically validate in any browser I've tried.
We use a StartCom.org certificate, because we have no more money for
thawte or something else. StartCom.org is trusted by Firefox/Iceweasel
and Konqueror by default. Sorry.
Other comments:
I
Ringo Kamens schrieb:
It might help to make links to certain sites in this list topic so
that google will index them. For instance:
awxcnx dotde/tor-i2p-proxy-en.htm?JASDJHSDF.ONION
Nice idea, we have done the job and hope, google will like our links.
That way, google gets to them and can do
Robert Hogan schrieb:
Do:
Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?) (browser)
I think, it is nessecary. Do this job in browser, because no proxy can
do it for SSL-encrypted stuff. And change the fake time by time.
You may try showmyip with and without javascript. In
Ben Wilhelm schrieb:
Pick the most common user-agent and use it. That's probably whatever the
latest version of Firefox returns.
Ok, I use (only a few examples):
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; sk-SK; rv:1.8.1.6)
Gecko/20070824 Firefox/2.0.0.6
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; de-DE;
BlueStar88 schrieb:
...On the 24th of December we updated our Intermediate CA certificates
and added a few needed extension to the original certificate. The public
key however did not change and all subscriber certificates are perfectly
valid. Please follow the instructions below to update
BlueStar88 schrieb:
or you may try the free SSL-service at
http://cert.startcom.org/
It is accepted by Mozilla browsers by default.
Wow, was my first thought, a free certificate already integrated into
current browsers, but where is the crux?
What's about the StartCom-side private key
Hi,
Can you give me a list of URLs, where I can find a
list of tor nodes?
https://torstat.xenobite.eu/
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/
http://tns.hermetix.org/
May be, some more are online, but I use the 3 above.
Greeting
I tried to run a tor node on a Strato vserver 1 year ago.
It did not work, because the max. connections were limited to 145
TCP-connection IN and 145 TCP-connections OUT. A TOR server needs at
least 1024 connections. See:
Last not least: how great, do you think, is the danger of
supporting spammers
when setting up my node for 465,993,995?
The SSL-encrypted SMTP-ports are using SMTP-Auth (mostly). The
support of spammer is very low (in my opinion).
By the way, I have the same problems like you since Nov.2006
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello german guys,
Der Druck erhöht sich:
wormhole ist bereits offline und braucht evtl. Hilfe, knuffel ist
unter neuem Namen wieder online, jetzt morphium.
Als mein Server vor 8 Wochen offline ging habe ich erfahren, dass der
Republikanische
21 matches
Mail list logo
