Upgrade Vidalia to 0.2.10 and the problem will go away.
On 10/14/2010 6:20 PM, Jon wrote:
Justin,
The first of the scrubs have now showed for the past 4 hrs. Once an
hour. It is now showing the address and it is the same address. It is
a ' geoips vidalia ' address ( am not showing complete addy
On 10/9/2010 11:14 AM, Anon Mus wrote:
Fabian Keil wrote:
And Tor says:
Oct 09 14:00:19.571 [notice] Have tried resolving or connecting to
address 'www.cobblers.za' at 3 different places. Giving up.
Fabian
Ahh, I have those but they only say,
"Oct 09 15:31:32.109 [Notice] Have tried resolving
On 3/6/2010 4:07 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 03:00:19PM -0500, to...@optonline.net wrote 0.4K bytes
in 7 lines about:
Mar 06 14:27:37.436 [Warning] We just marked ourself as down. Are your
external addresses reachable?
Well, is your IP address reachable from the I
I noticed there's not much traffic coming through my relay and found
this in the log. Any ideas?
Mar 06 14:27:37.436 [Warning] We just marked ourself as down. Are your
external addresses reachable?
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-
I am having the same problem. When I put my nickname in EntryNodes, Tor
starts fine, but when I add StrictEntryNodes 1 I get this same error. I
tried putting in my IP instead of my nickname, but Tor then says that
using an IP is not yet supported, using 0.2.1.20.
Sambuddho Chakravarty wrote:
Roger Dingledine wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 06:37:46PM -0400, TorOp wrote:
On my Tor network map, every relay has a ? next to it instead of the
country icon.
Is this a bug or is there a file I can remove to get it to show properly?
Platform: Tor 0.2.1.19 on Windows Server 2003 Service
On my Tor network map, every relay has a ? next to it instead of the
country icon.
Is this a bug or is there a file I can remove to get it to show properly?
Platform: Tor 0.2.1.19 on Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 [server]
{enterprise} {terminal services, single user} {terminal services}
Ted Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 13:39 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
Verizon residential service is only available at my location if I also
buy their telephone service, the combination of which would cost ~
$80/mo. and
also require a 12-month contract. I have yet to get the details on
Veriz
I started it just now and everything is fine. Must have been some weird
glitch.
TorOp wrote:
I started up my Tor node just now and noticed some strange behavior.
First, the node CPU utilization went to and stayed at 100%. Second, the
bandwidth graph lines moved so fast that I could barely
Windows Server 2003, with all the latest patches, running under MS
Virtual PC.
Ringo Kamens wrote:
Are you on Windows? Linux?
Comrade Ringo Kamens
On 3/9/08, *TorOp* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
I started up my Tor node just now and noticed
I started up my Tor node just now and noticed some strange behavior.
First, the node CPU utilization went to and stayed at 100%. Second, the
bandwidth graph lines moved so fast that I could barely see them go by.
I'm running the latest 2.0.21 version and made no changes to anything
since it wa
Andrew wrote:
TorOp schrieb:
And what's this about?
Jan 27 10:08:00.373 [Notice] Our IP Address has changed from
69.119.206.101 to 212.112.242.159; rebuilding descriptor.
Jan 27 10:08:01.595 [Notice] Self-testing indicates your ORPort is
reachable from the outside. Excellent. Publi
I just upgraded to 0.2.0.17 and didn't see an announcement of 0.2.0.18,
which I guess I'll install tonight.
Jan 27 10:07:38.882 [Warning] Please upgrade! This version of Tor
(0.2.0.17-alpha) is not recommended, according to the directory
authorities. Recommended versions are:
0.1.2.19,0.2.0.1
Been getting these all day today.
Jan 10 19:33:14.675 [Warning] Received http status code 404 ("Not
found") from server '221.126.240.32:8080' while fetching
"/tor/keys/fp/0D95B91896E6089AB9A3C6CB56E724CAF898C43F".
Jan 10 19:42:22.933 [Warning] Received http status code 404 ("Not
found") from s
14 matches
Mail list logo
