James Brown (25.07.2009 00:16):
> Gitano wrote:
>> James Brown wrote:
>>
>>
>>> And what about phone calls, including call to ordinaty telephones?
>>>
>> I use 'ihu' as an alternate for skype, but its a peer-to-peer
>> application and for Linux only. AFAIK there is no SIP-based VoIP
>> Soft
Tripple Moon (29.04.2009 17:33):
>> And if somebody wanted to circumvent, I would think the
>> client could be
>> modified so that when it claimed to be uploading itself, it
>> was actually
>> uploading a copy of an unmodified binary. Am I missing
>> something?
> Well yea thats upto the implementa
Matej Kovacic (02.01.2009 19:39):
> Hi,
>
>> That's what it is supposed to say until you give it a name. The
>> assumption is that you use out of band methods to authenticate the cert
>> is correctly assigned. And then you type whatever nickname you want to
>> give it into the petname field. Sh
scar (18.04.2008 02:04):
> not exactly sure how to articulate this, but i'll do my best.
>
> assume there is a global adversary trying to track down an anonymous
> Tor-user by using syntax analysis. that is to say, gathering sets of
> sentences or paragraphs from e-mails or forums, etc. and then
Mike Perry wrote on 25.02.2008 09:33:
> Torbutton 1.1.14-alpha has been released at
> https://torbutton.torproject.org/dev/.
Hello Mike,
Installation link at https://torbutton.torproject.org/dev/, namely
http://torbutton.torproject.org/dev/torbutton-current-alpha.xpi has HTTP
access schema even
F. Fox wrote on 29.01.2008 00:54:
> Kraktus wrote:
>> You can add
>> ExcludeNodes NodeName1, NodeName2
>> to your torrc, where the NodeName1, etc. are the names of Chinese exit
>> nodes that you are aware of. However, you much disallow each Chinese
>> node separately; you can't exclude by country.
Hi guys,
I'm currently working on the new project of tightly secured collabo-
rative/wiki environment software with some neat features, e.g. GnuPG
server-side integration for users' signatures verification and display
on page revisions, comments and so on. Another major goal is censorship
resistan
Eugen Leitl wrote on 17.12.2007 20:38:
> Log-free? If Tor doesn't log, your firewall'd better. You want
> to be your nodes not attributable to you, wait until 20090101,
> then go malware. I mean, if running Tor without logs after 20090101
> is illegal, then what else do you have to lose? You're a c
Martin Fick wrote on 18.12.2007 01:05:
> --- "Vlad \"SATtva\" Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Have you looked at FireGPG Firefox extension?
>> http://firegpg.tuxfamily.org/
>
> --- "Alexander W. Janssen"
> <[EMAIL PRO
Martin Fick wrote on 17.12.2007 23:25:
> I am surprised that HTML does not seem
> to have some extension to deal with this
> already. It is not much different from
> encrypted email concepts, just that the
> browser needs the ability to do the
> decrypting instead of your mail program.
> The s
Michael Holstein wrote on 17.12.2007 23:01:
> I'm not a mathematician, but it can't be wise to store multiple copies
> of the same plaintext encrypted by the same cipher using different keys
> .. much crypto has historically been broken that way.
As a side note: In the context of OpenPGP you have
Martin Fick wrote on 15.12.2007 11:08:
> Hi,
>
> I have what may perhaps seem like a strange question.
> Is there any commonly used software for encrypting and
> decrypting web pages?
>
> Let me explain that a little better: imagine a web
> site which has content destined for specific
> indiv
Scott Bennett wrote on 05.12.2007 04:14:
>>> I have not run a tor server, so I do not know the exact requirements.
>>> Can it be done from a ram drive?
>> It could, but you'd need to make sure it doesn't swap/page down to disk,
>> which would be bad.
>>
> I'm not a LINUX user, but I would be s
coderman wrote on 14.09.2007 06:39:
> On 9/13/07, scar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ...
>> so, if we are using a website that uses HTTPS, but, in firefox, for
>> example, in the cookies list under that website it shows "Send
>> for: any type of connection", then the session is vulnerable?
>
> vul
Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote on 19.07.2007 11:43:
> The discussion about fast nodes: Is there a way to tell the client,
> "Only select fast nodes"? Does "fast" imply high throughput (but it
> might be slow to start up), or fast startup/turn around?
I think if such an option would be implemen
Roger Dingledine wrote on 05.05.2007 15:22:
> On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 01:50:23AM -0400, Freemor wrote:
>> I recently upgraded to"tor 0.1.2.13-2~dapper" and although it works
>> very nicely it seems very "chatty". by chatty I mean download 200+ KB
>> every minute from DIR servers. That's gonna add
Roger Dingledine wrote on 13.04.2007 23:50:
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 03:24:40PM +0700, Vlad SATtva Miller wrote:
>> ...However none of the mentioned below router nicknames or fingerprints
>> was found in the current local cache file.
>>
>> Original Messag
...However none of the mentioned below router nicknames or fingerprints
was found in the current local cache file.
Original Message
Subject: High-traffic Colluding Tor Routers in Washington, D.C. Confirmed
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:35:52 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
xiando wrote on 26.02.2007 9:15:
> It may also be the case that ISPs in a whole country is the adversary, for
> example, SORM hardware connected to Federal Agency of Government
> Communications and Information (FAGCI) is installed at ALL the ISPs (There
> are some fights about this laid out the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
BlueStar88 wrote on 26.12.2006 00:52:
> Hello,
>
> Tor node ip lists as csv plaintext available here:
>
> https://torstat.xenobite.eu/tor_exitnodes.csv
> https://torstat.xenobite.eu/tor_allnodes.csv
Great tool. How frequently is this list
20 matches
Mail list logo
