On Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:32:26 -0500, misc wrote:
> The function MapAddress in tor config no longer works.
>
> Tor simply ignores it and connect using any node. Any solutions?
>
> Tor 0.2.0.33/Vidalia 0.1.9
What am I doing wrong?
Please advise how to make MapAddress setting to wor
The function MapAddress in tor config no longer works.
Tor simply ignores it and connect using any node. Any solutions?
Tor 0.2.0.33/Vidalia 0.1.9
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 08:04:26 -0400, Ted Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 22:48 -0400, misc wrote:
>> Is it possible to run GnuPG through Tor? (when connecting to LDAP and HKP
>> servers to exchange keys)?
>>
>
> The way I do it is:
>
> keyserver x-hkp://d3
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 23:07:14 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:28:04PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.6K bytes
> in 13 lines about:
>:> i think if you are using Torbutton in Firefox and have the default
>:> options set, then it is OK to use java: Torbutton will block
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:39:48 -0700, scar wrote:
>
> i think if you are using Torbutton in Firefox and have the default
> options set, then it is OK to use java: Torbutton will block all
> malicious attempts by Java/Javascript to bypass your anonymity.
>
> is that a reasonable assumption?
I reall
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:32:43 +0200, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
> misc wrote:
>> Is there any way at all to get keys from LDAP server through Tor?
>
> LDAP uses TCP, so yes, it should be working if you configure GnuPG to
> use a proxy.
>
> Alex.
GnuPG only has options
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:37:56 -0500 (CDT), Scott Bennett wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:45:10 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>On Monday 20 October 2008 22:48:32 misc wrote:
>>> Is it possible to run GnuPG through Tor? (when connecting to LDAP and HKP
>>&g
Is it possible to run GnuPG through Tor? (when connecting to LDAP and HKP
servers to exchange keys)?
On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 02:14:37 +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> Is there a way to tune TCPIP parameteres in Windows to better work with Tor?
>
> Short answer -- no. Tor's slowness is at the application layer, you
> won't achieve much by tweaking the transport layer.
>
>> For example, should De
I'm using Tor 0.2.0.22 and it's very slow.
Is there a way to tune TCPIP parameteres in Windows to better work with
Tor? I'm talking most about values in this registry key:
[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\Tcpip\Parameters]
For example, should DefaultTTL be increased, so that
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:49:32 -0800, Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake misc ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
>> What about NoScript extension? Will that prevent gathering information
>> about installed plugins and other settings?
>
> Not to my knowledge. Adblock Plus has s
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:38:58 -0800, Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake kazaam ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> A few comments on this. First off, the fact that window sizes factor
> into a hash means as soon as you resize your window 1 pixel, they get
> a completely new identifier, uncorrelated to the previo
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:27:03 -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 01:21:59PM -0400, misc wrote:
>> Is there a way to torrify UDP (I'm not talking about DNS) and ICMP?
>>
>> For example how can I ping somebody through Tor?
>
> No.
Is there a way to torrify UDP (I'm not talking about DNS) and ICMP?
For example how can I ping somebody through Tor?
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:26:28 +1000, Steven Huf wrote:
> Would you be able to tell me how to unsubscribe then please?
>
Send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with empty subject and body containing
text:
unsubscribe or-talk
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 12:22:26 -0400, Jay Goodman Tamboli wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2007, at 12:02:50, misc wrote:
>
>> Well, it's is not working. I 'm still getting e-mails from the
>> list, just
>> as before, including all the messages posted this morning.
>
&
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:49:47 -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>
> We're running mailman here too. One of the things I've been meaning to
> do in my copious free time is move the Tor lists over.
Move them to mailman? That would be great!
> you're roughly the second person to ask for this feature
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:43:41 -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>
> The answer is that you should mail me and I'll whitelist your
> address -- then you can post while not receiving mails.
Thanks Roger. I guess I was expecting to find an automated way of doing
this. With Mailman one can just send auto
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007 09:42:43 +1000, Steven Huf wrote:
> Quote: "How can I put this list into "no-mail mode" (so that I do not
> receive any
> e-mails from it)?"
>
> Same, it's really filling up my inbox unnecessarily...
>
> On 9/17/07, misc <[
How can I put this list into "no-mail mode" (so that I do not receive any
e-mails from it)?
I'm accessing it using the newsreader, so I do not need hundreds of e-mails
simultaneously going to my e-mail account.
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 08:42:32 +0100, Robert Hogan wrote:
> TorK allows you to do this (in a rough and ready way using the geoip database
> (maxmind.com) - about 9x% accurate). TorK is available only for Linux/BSD
> unfortunately, but you could you use the Incognito LiveCD which uses TorK as
> th
On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 01:25:51 -0500 (CDT), Scott Bennett wrote:
> I'd strongly recommend that you start with the tor overview
> document at
>
> https://tor.eff.org/overview
>
> paying special attention to the cartoon describing how circuits are built,
> which should begin to straighten
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 23:17:14 -0500 (CDT), Scott Bennett wrote:
> Please read the tor documentation. If you think you've already done
> that, please go back and read it again.
That brings back the pain of reading it the first time :)
I must admit I gave up after first few pages. I found i
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 22:20:16 -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
>
> AFAIK tor connects to an entry guard which then connects to the exit
> node for you. This way, they can't take the logs from the exit node
> and go "well.. the IP in question connected to you 20 seconds before
> the alleged connection was
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:39:17 -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
> I don't think you get the problem here. Squid wouldn't be able to
> affect the choice of exit nodes. It would just be able to filter entry
> nodes.
> Comrade Ringo Kamens
I know how to filter entry nodes. I can do it with Protowall or anot
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:47:56 -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
> The best option is to run a squid server on localhost with a block by
> country filter. Then, route your tor client through it.
> Comrade Ringo Kamens
>
I researched it more and everybody is saying squid goes between the browser
and tor:
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:57:51 -0500 (CDT), Scott Bennett wrote:
>
> Why would they waste their time? They will have already gotten copies
> of what they want as it traveled in the clear between its origin and the web
> server. Remember the news articles a while back about all those snoop bo
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:29:16 -0700, Wesley Kenzie wrote:
> www.pickaproxy.com
So your server can see all the traffic in cleartext before it enters Tor
network AND where the traffic is coming from. In other words users do not
have any protection from your server.
If you have not been approached b
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:47:56 -0400, Ringo Kamens wrote:
> The best option is to run a squid server on localhost with a block by
> country filter. Then, route your tor client through it.
> Comrade Ringo Kamens
I understand the part about running squid on localhost and routing web
brouser through i
I'm using Tor on windows
I prefer to avoid tor nodes from certain countries. I know that I can
manually add nodes into ExcludeNodes setting in Tor Config.
However there are over hundred different Tor nodes in one country I want to
exclude. And they're constantly changing (news ones pop up, old
30 matches
Mail list logo
