Tor-Lite?

2007-07-28 Thread patgus
this just happened to pop into my head, and maybe the subject has been brought up before but I have not seen such a discussion. How about providing a lite version of Tor, or maybe making it possible with a config file. It strikes me that not all of us who want to use Tor need the heavy-duty encry

Re: more letters from the feds

2007-01-27 Thread patgus
Problem still exists though, that Tor needs more exit nodes. If nobody is willing to run an exit server the performance of the network suffers dramatically. I personally find the performance of the network to be almost unusable, so I choose other pay-for anonymity services. This is not a bash of T

Gibraltar - tor linux gateway distribution/appliance

2006-11-25 Thread patgus
Just thought I would mention this, I just found it, although it appears to have been around for a while. They are selling gateway appliances for business use which include tor, jap, and freenet. If you look around under the download section they have the linux distribution they use for their ap

Re: Tor-compatible secure email systems

2006-10-12 Thread patgus
Or of course, using the keylogger capture the email before it is encrypted. On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:29:39 -0500 patgus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well that should work. PGP offers more of an illusion of security than most > people realize. If someone knows whos email they want

Re: Tor-compatible secure email systems

2006-10-12 Thread patgus
Well that should work. PGP offers more of an illusion of security than most people realize. If someone knows whos email they want to read, and can find you online. All they have to do is hack into your computer, steal your keyfile, and install a keylogger to capture your password, and blam - no

Re: Tor appliance

2006-09-23 Thread patgus
Yeah they make great firewall appliances, smoothwall has particularily low hardware requirements. There is also FreeSCO, Linux Router Project, and several others you can find searching gat linux.org On Sat, 16 Sep 2006 08:40:05 +0200 Brad Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > How about to