Have you guys thought organizing a (very) public Kickstarter.com project for
the purpose of raising the funds and creating awareness of need?
.w
On May 10, 2010, at 8:06 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> At the moment, 25% of all traffic exits through Blutmagie (thanks
> Ola
for more exit notes, statistics, and some kind of visualization of
what the impact would be for a given amount donated?
And make it beautiful and simple, like this: http://www.charitywater.org/donate/
.w
On May 12, 2010, at 1:11 PM, Moritz Bartl wrote:
> I first planned to offer a certain band
Is there a "torify" equivalent for Mac OS X, or does Torify work on that
platform... And if so, can it wrap GUI applications as well? Asking because I'd
like certain applications on my system without individual proxy settings to use
Tor, and certain apps of the same clas
Well, assuming that it is only a technically-minded userbase that installs Tor,
then maybe! Do you guys have any sense of whether or not that's actually true?
.w
On May 13, 2010, at 6:57 PM, Martin Fick wrote:
> I would think that the slowness of the network would be
> reminder
re heavily congested. Click here to
help . . . " would have a beneficial impact.
All this being said, I completely understand, even even fully empathize with
your reaction. I would never want to see Tor be packaged with crapware!
.w
On May 13, 2010, at 8:31 PM, Jon wrote:
> I can not spe
ainstream the conceptual direction could perhaps be at least
mildly useful?
.w
On May 14, 2010, at 12:59 AM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
> If by GUI applications you mean native OS X carbon/cocoa apps, unlikely
> un
Wow Runa, while I unfortunately can't help with any translations, I just want
to say that that app looks wonderful and wish you the best of luck with it.
Wish I had something like that on my iPhone!
.w
On May 15, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote:
> As many of you probably k
Does Tor do any kind of traffic shaping?
.w
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
Hi all,
I am getting a lot of these messages lately -- how can I increase the wait time?
502 Server dropped connection
The following error occurred while trying to access http://xxx
502 Server dropped connection
Generated Sat, 15 May 2010 19:37:54 EDT by Polipo on xxx.local:8118.
.w
In this case, purposely 'shaping' the traffic so that it looks like something
other than what it actually is (ie, not Tor traffic).
.w
On May 15, 2010, at 11:18 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
> What do you mean by tr
background process affect battery life?
.w
On May 16, 2010, at 5:25 AM, Marco Bonetti wrote:
> Don't worry: I'm working on it :-P
> See http://sid77.slackware.it/iphone/
***
To unsubscribe, send an
Interesting. Well, I ask this one because I've always found that my battery
drains the fastest when using the 3G or EDGE connection. Significantly faster
than playing an intensive 3D game, even...
.w
On May 16, 2010, at 5:57 AM, Marco Bonetti wrote:
> Backgrounding itself is co
"How can we avoid discussing politics when it seems to intrude
everywhere?"
That's the pernicious part of politics. As long as which ever group is in power has the ability to give goodies to whom they want, it'll keep up.
Not just money, either...many lobby's aren't seeking money, but having
Geoffrey Goodell said the following on
5/10/2006 7:24 AM:
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:23:05AM -0400, Geoffrey Goodell wrote:
The site may crash, change location, or creash.
I don't know what 'creash' is, but it sounds really bad. :)
Geoff
a creash is what happens when a cra
site thats passing them on...get in
touch with me: [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Seems silly to have 100 of the
things, and no takers.
Again...thank you all for the education & hard work (I know from my
limited experience that coding is tedious). And thanks for believing in
individuals.
Christopher W.
hanks again, all.
On 5/11/06, Christopher W. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hello,everyone
First, thanks to everyone who contributes to this list, to the
development of Tor, the TorCP, Vidalia, and if any of the authors of
Privoxy are around, those fine folks. I've
hi,
I had installed Tor+Privoxy on my Mac, but Privoxy started pissing me
off. I uninstalled Privoxy and Firefox with Tor didn't work - I got the
"The proxy server is refusing connections" error. I uninstalled whole
pack, restarted my computer, installed only Tor and Tor-startup package,
updated T
Audie Murphy wrote:
> How did you do the uninstall?
>
>
>
First I just uninstalled Privoxy with uninstall.command bash script, but
it didn't worked - there still was the error.
Secondly I tried uninstall.AppleScript script but I got an error "Too
many errors" that told me that uninstallation
Roger Dingledine wrote:
> It is possible, but I've found it harder to explain to people how to do
> it, so we simply recommend using Privoxy. If you want to take Privoxy
> out of the loop, check out:
> http://tor.eff.org/docs/tor-switchproxy.html
> http://foxyproxy.mozdev.org/
> http://www.imperia
hi,
I had installed Tor+Privoxy on my Mac, but Privoxy started pissing me
off. I uninstalled Privoxy and Firefox with Tor didn't work - I got the
"The proxy server is refusing connections" error. I uninstalled whole
pack, restarted my computer, installed only Tor and Tor-startup package,
updated T
OK, we heard a lot of technical details, I'll cover the non-tech part of it.
On 3/7/07, Fergie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Comments?
Yes, it's stupid.
First, the legal issues. What he does is overtaking a TOR-user's
machine by malicious code. He's accusing people of being childporn
consuments
On 3/7/07, Nick Mathewson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...] and fangirls reading harry/ron slashfic online.
The picture! It's burning into my brain-patterns! ARGH!
Cheers, Alex.
--
"I am tired of all this sort of thing called science here... We have spent
millions in that sort of thing for the
On 3/9/07, James Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.securityfocus.com/news/11447
A quote which worries me:
"Tor servers meet the definition of an Internet service provider,
which means that operators are not required to know what data passed
through the server, said Kevin Bankston, staf
On 3/9/07, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:37:58AM +0100, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
> If TOR would legally qualify as an ISP, we're in deep trouble.
We don't provide access to the Internet, and we're not charging
for it. Last time I l
Well what you could do is remote-debugging.
Follow instructions to build gdb-sever for OpenWRT:
http://forum.openwrt.org/viewtopic.php?pid=29712
Install gdb-server
Run gdb-server on your WRT:
# gdb-server $ip:12345 /path/to/tor $myoptions
(Tor won't start immediately but will wait for a "cont"
On 3/31/07, Karsten Loesing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
But who knows? Perhaps they have multiple strategies? :)
Sorry, I can't help myself, but I'm tempted to rename my node to
something intriguing just for the fun of it.
"Fear and Loathing in Fort Meade" :)
Names mean nothing.
Karsten
Ale
Hi all,
since the tracker Robert used went down, I set up a tracker elsewhere.
The torrent Metafile can be accessed at
http://yalla.ynfonatic.de/media/TorLiveCD-TestingOnly.iso.torrent
The md5sum of the ISO is 0843b24fb08edf6e0ef64f82083e041b and it would
be good if Robert could confirm that.
I
On 4/5/07, James Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You may be interested to know that there is a Live CD which bundles Tor
and some ipchains rules. It is mentioned in the Tor FAQ -- see "Virtual
Privacy Machine":
Actually Robert Hogan hacked together a Live-CD. Torrent here:
http://yalla.ynfonat
OK, that's half off-topic, sorry for that.
To the operator of the node "AoF":
You didn't give any contact-info, so I try to reach you on this way:
Your node doesn't seem to work very well, the squid-proxy you're using
ran out of sockets. If you try to use your node, you'll always end up
with the
On 5/19/07, Rouslan Nabioullin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Will a reactive firewall affect a middle-node Tor server? I am planning to
use a Smoothwall Linux firewall with the reactive mod
(http://community.smoothwall.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8206).
Well, what does "reactive" mean? I just had a
On 5/30/07, Kyle Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was testing a spam-reply script and or-talk@freehaven.net got into it
somehow.
My bad, sorry.
YMMD :-)
Alex.
--
"I am tired of all this sort of thing called science here... We have spent
millions in that sort of thing for the last few ye
Hi,
for maintenance-reasons I had to shut down my server today. However,
after shutting down the server I realized that there's still much
traffic, although shutdown was 30 minutes ago.
So, does the server tell it's peers that it's going down? Does it
deregister? Or is that stray-traffic?
Cheer
OK, thanks for all your answer, I was a bit busy lately.
On 7/14/07, Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Skipping your questions, I pose the following ones.
1) Which signal did you send tor to get it to shut down?
SIGINT
2) If SIGINT, had ShutdownDelay seconds passed wit
On 8/7/07, Frozen Flame <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, guys.
Hi!
> Is anyone interested on the return of the hidden wiki?
Fire at will.
Alex.
--
"I am tired of all this sort of thing called science here... We have spent
millions in that sort of thing for the last few years, and it is tim
The interesting part in english:
1) The state filed two cases against me. There are ongoing
investigations for multiple accusations.
2) I'm OK.
3) I have a competent lawyer.
4) I've shut down my server "wormhole" to protect my family.
5) Don't gossip. I'll break the news when I know I'll be safe.
Hallo! (german - sorry)
On 9/8/07, TOR Admin (gpfTOR1) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "wormhole" ist bereits offline und braucht evtl. Hilfe
Ich will hier einmal proaktiv ein paar Informationen abgeben, um
Gerüchten, Spekulationen und der allgemeinen Paranoia zuvorzukommen:
1) Ja, gegen mich wird
Just one contra:
"Supporting $some_crime" always means that you knew about that certain
case they're suing you about. Since you can only know about something
if you start sniffing - which is strictly forbidden - you can't
possibly know about a direct certain crime.
Unless you were it yourself, usi
Hi all,
I made some dubious comments recently about ongoing investigations
against me. Today I got a letter from the lawyer of the state telling
me that I'm not longer a suspect.
Hereby I break my silence:
http://itnomad.wordpress.com/2007/09/16/tor-madness-reloaded/
Thanks for all the people wh
On 9/16/07, Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://itnomad.wordpress.com/2007/09/16/tor-madness-reloaded/
> Alex, perhaps you or somebody could put up a web page, in German, that
> explains in simple terms what Tor is about, aimed at explaining to the
> average German police offic
On 9/16/07, Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Actually what'd be more useful would be something like a tag in the
> >whois-database... But the average copper would probably either ignore
> >or not understand it :-(
> >
> Um...and that would be more useful how? I thought the suggesti
On 9/16/07, Ryan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's still the possibility that a server op is using their Tor node
> as a scapegoat and really is doing bad things (I don't mean to imply
> that's the case here). Even if the police know that their suspect is
> running a Tor node, what Tor is
On 9/16/07, Ringo Kamens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there any way that people can donate to help cover your legal fees?
> I'll commit to one US dollar. If half the people who read this message
> did that, it would at least take a small chunk out of that mountain of
> legal fees you're facing.
On 9/16/07, Ringo Kamens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you set up a paypal account I would be willing to donate on a
> case-by-case basis (in this case, it would be to help with your legal
> fees). I think even if you don't need help with legal fees by
> receiving donations from all across the wo
Hi!
On 9/18/07, xiando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A question to all Tor-operators:
> > I'd like to do a survey about all incidents which happened to
> > operators. Stuff like:
> >
> > * arrested
> > * confiscated equippment
> > * nastygram
> > * surveillance
> > * ...
> >
> > What would be pos
The easiest solution would be just using different browser-profiles
and run them simultaneously. One for Tor, one for everything else.
Cheers, Alex.
--
"I am tired of all this sort of thing called science here... We have spent
millions in that sort of thing for the last few years, and it is time
On 9/21/07, Arrakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys, quick question.
>
> If I have Tor process running, and request a url that has 10 images to
> load from the same domain, do all the requests go through the same
> circuit, or does the tor process split up the requests across all the
> circui
On 9/21/07, Arrakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does Tor care about the destination of the TCP request, when deciding to
> make a new circuit, and thus will use one because it is already dirtied
> by that domain?
s/domain/IP-address ?
However, that's all up to the implementation of the internal
On 9/21/07, Nick Mathewson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Short answer: Tor tries to group many streams on a single circuit. If
> we didn't, that would be way too much PK.
Means, if the browser opens up 6 instances to grab stuff from a site,
Tor consolidates all requests into a single circuit?
Mak
On 9/29/07, Watson Ladd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> English is not easy, nor is it a lingua franca.
Everybody knows that Elbonian is the lingua franca in IT.
> Watson Ladd
Scnr, Alex.
--
"I am tired of all this sort of thing called science here... We have spent
millions in that sort of thing
On 10/15/07, Gregory Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't intend to troll... but wouldn't be ..er better if playing the
> videos didn't require using Flash?
My mplayer plays downloaded Flash-videos just fine.
Alex.
--
"I am tired of all this sort of thing called science here... We have
On 10/30/07, Florian Reitmeir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Dave Page wrote:
>
> > http://observer.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,,2200579,00.html
> > Mentions xB browser for anonymous browsing.
>
> and how is this Tor related?
xB is the new name for Torpark.
http://sup
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/31/07, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Hello,
Hi!
> In my mrtg graphs I see fair traffic until april, then less traffic
> until august and after august it is 2xx bytes/s in average with almost
> no peaks.
> Why is the traffic like it is?
No idea.
On 11/3/07, Udo van den Heuvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> > Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
> >>> no peaks.
> >>> Why is the traffic like it is?
> >> No idea. Did you ever update/restart your Tor-server?
> >&g
Hi Mirko,
that sounds... disastrous. I'm facing the same thing at the moment, a quite
similar case - although my lawyer currently tries to fight off an actual case
at court, pointing out all the other incidents I suffered of earlier.
This stinks. "Beihilfe" my a**.
BTW, I'm currently reading
htt
Am Mittwoch, den 14.11.2007, 21:22 +0100 schrieb TOR Admin (gpfTOR1):
> Hi Mirko,
>
> 1: by German law a Tor node admin is something like an access provider.
> You are not responsible for your traffic. If the court have only an IP
> address and you have a tor status log, they have nothing.
I'd po
Am Mittwoch, den 14.11.2007, 22:48 +0100 schrieb Thomas Hluchnik:
> Has anyone ever tried to speak with the guys from SPIEGEL, FAZ, Sueddeutsche
> and so on that they drive own tor nodes? This would be good PR for tor.
Hm, not me, althoug I know that some journalist organisations were
thinking ab
This is to all german Tor-operators about the possibilty to found a
german Tor legal fund. In german. Obviously.
Hallo Kameraden,
so langsam wird es Zeit. Ich hatte selber schon drei Verfahren gegen
mich, die mich jetzt schon viele hundert Euro an Anwaltsrechnung kosten.
Heute habe ich von jemand
Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 00:58 +0100 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
Hi!
> > Warum nicht einen Verein gründen? Spenden annehmen. Anwälte bezahlen.
> > Operator raushauen. So etwas gibt es in Deutschland noch nicht. Aber es
> > wird Zeit, dass wir so etwas bekommen.
>
> Das verstehe ich je
Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 01:19 +0100 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
>
> > Nicht, dass ich wüsste. Soweit ich weiss, will sich die Pricacy
> > Foundation auf Lobbyarbeit beschränken. Das ist zumindestens mein
> > letzter Kenntnisstand.
>
> Ich habe das zur Sprache gebracht, weil *jeder*, d
Am Donnerstag, den 15.11.2007, 01:19 +0100 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> [... Privacy Foundation ...]
Ich habe gerade eine Anfrage an die Privacy Foundation geschickt und sie
gebeten, mir zur erklären, was folgender Passus[1] bedeutet:
"In Ausnahmefällen bietet die German Privacy Foundation e.V. a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ringo Kamens schrieb:
> I pledge $10 if the fund starts. Please allow mail donations.
> Hopefully others can also pledge.
> Comrade Ringo Kamens
Thanks Ringo, we appreciate that.
On another note: I'm currently reading all the emails and submissions I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew wrote:
> Actually, it might be wise to develop a feature that lets the client
> choose no more than one node from _any_ country, since other EU
> countries might use the directive that led to the german law, to pass
> similar laws.
Which means,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Senftleben wrote:
> Am Samstag, 24. November 2007 schrieb Alexander W. Janssen:
>> Andrew wrote:
>> 'Nuff said. Let's stop the nay saying ;) The law isn't active yet.
>> The law isn't even ratified. A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Onion wrote:
> That's why I'd also prefer a name covering all facets of OR like
> 'Deutsche Anonymisierserver Initiative - DASI gegen Stasi', with
> equivalent shorthand expressions ('British [...] Anonymisation Server
> Initiative' = 'BASI') easy to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Firefox should in principle not use the DNS if
>
> network.proxy.socks_remote_dns
>
> is set to true (in about:config).
Hm, I'm not sure - I thought this option only works if you're using a
SOCKS-proxy, e.g. connecting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> If I was in your position I might consider putting some bulk
> demagnetizers near my hard drives with a panic switch, with backups to a
> secure unknown location.
Now this is definitively a bizarre idea... :-)
That reminds
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
F. Fox wrote:
> However, let's suppose that we're in a time when German Tor nodes are
> now actively keeping logs of all connections. What would be the best way to:
As I already said in an earlier posting, German Tor nodes won't be
starting logging be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Judge: "Ok you are to be held in contempt and in jail xyz, until such
> time as you give us the pass phrase to your data"
Only a matter of the UK at the moment. Bad enough though.
> Most data overwrite programs take too l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I guess you can read one persons attack but are blind to others
What attack?
> And I thought the people on this list were against censorship, unless
> they, of course, are doing the censoring.
I'm trying to follow the thr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I guess you can read one persons attack but are blind to others
>
> What attack?
OK, i swept back through the postings and /dev/ass wasn't nice too. Got
that, Eugen?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Fick wrote:
> Yes, but it really is a fairly simple one. I am surprised that HTML
> does not seem to have some extension to deal with this already. It
> is not much different from encrypted email concepts, just that the
> browser needs the abi
Trying to run a bridge I get the following error:
Starting tor daemon: tor...
Dec 24 08:13:15.454 [notice] Tor v0.2.0.14-alpha (r12937). This is
experimental software. Do not rely on it for strong anonymity. (Running on
Linux x86_64)
Dec 24 08:13:15.456 [notice] Initialized libevent version 1.1a u
> Brian wrote:
>> I sort of understand what the error is saying but I don't know how to
>> fix
>> it. Suggestions?
> http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Dec-2007/msg00284.html ;-)
>
> - --
> Marco Bonetti
Ah, thanks. Now tor started without error. But, how can I tell if the
bridge is working? The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ringo Kamens schrieb:
> Just so you know, gmail filtered this as spam.
Not for my gmail-account though...
> Comrade Ringo Kamens
Alex.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBR3S4dBYlVVSQ3uFxAQJmjwQAwW7Q66EhlSHbFhkh6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian D. wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I like the TOR project and want to participate. My question: Is it a
> good idea to set up a server, which is not connected to the internet
> contineously? -- i.e. I turn on my computer, when I come home from
> work and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ben Stover schrieb:
> Is there something similar like "Torbutton" FF plugin for the
> Internet Explorer ?
A quick check on Google revealed:
http://www.geocities.com/claudias_za/
http://swodum.com/
Not sure if any of those are any good though.
If you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
F. Fox schrieb:
> [I was going to leave your quoted message in... but my Lord, is your
> monitor as wide as a football field?! =xoD ]
Since you're using Icedove, a little hint: If you go to the "Edit"-menu,
you'll find a nice "rewrap message" function
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
F. Fox schrieb:
> Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
>> F. Fox schrieb:
>>> [I was going to leave your quoted message in... but my Lord, is your
>>> monitor as wide as a football field?! =xoD ]
>> Since you're using Ic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans Schnehl wrote:
> Hi,
Hi!
> Jan 02 12:46:06.204 [debug] TLS error:
> (errno=54: Connection reset by peer) Jan 02 12:46:06.204 [info]
> connection_read_to_buf(): tls error [connection reset]. breaking
> (nickname NoNickNode, address 111.112.113.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ringo Kamens wrote:
> This is certainly not adviseable because of the lack of security built
> into windows and the possible backdoors.
I ain't no Windows-advocate but I find this argument a bit weak.
Nowadays all the modern operating systems have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eugen Leitl wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 03:09:16PM +0100, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
>
>> I ain't no Windows-advocate but I find this argument a bit weak.
>> Nowadays all the modern operating systems have the same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Bennett schrieb:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2008 20:55:36 +0100 Tom Hek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>> i'm changing my public IP number ten times per day and to avoid
>>> confusion,
>
> *Ten times per day?* Please tell us again why it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
accept no limits schrieb:
> Now the server has new IPs and this exit node will soon be back.
Congratulations!
> Bye
> accept no limits
Alex.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBR4OxdRYlVVSQ3uFxAQL7EgQAqQUPYZLGz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kazaam schrieb:
> Hi, I myself am using the foxyproxy plugin and not torbutton. With
> foxyproxy I simply make a blacklistrule which routes evertyhing
> through tor and only whitelist pages I'm really trusting.
>
> With TorButton I see many problems:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[...snip...]
A bit of quoting[1] would've been nice. It's hard to follow that email.
Alex.
[1] http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBR5jUqRYlVVSQ3uFxAQJBHwP/bAIPKg9JL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Bennett wrote:
> In the United States, knowingly giving false information to a federal
> law enforcement officer is a felony, so as soon as they found out you had
> deceived them, they would likely charge you with that crime.
That sounds a
Tom Hek schrieb:
> Thanks :) My ISP reconnected me again but I had to promise to never run
> Tor again. Tomorrow I'm going to call them and try to change their
> minds. XS4ALL is a ISP who stands for freedom of speech, they are
> against censorship, etc etc. If they knew what Tor was they wouldn't
Rochester TOR Admin schrieb:
> A few other environment factors:
> - my firwall is a pretty old machine with a very slow NIC
> - my tor server NIC is very cheap [<$10]
>
> Could anyone give me some insight about what they think might be going on?
I'm not sure... what's a "pretty old machine"? I
Oh, and memory might be an issue too. If your machine starts paging and
swapping it'll suffer from it.
at-sar helps there too.
Alex.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi all,
following up a discussion on #tor I made up a Wiki-article about the
abovementioned subject.
https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/RecommendedSoftware
Abstract: To create a list of "Applications Recommended For Use With
Tor" [2]. Those applications must obey the rules of
1) using the proxy
Kyle Williams schrieb:
> Hello Alex,
Aloha Kyle!
> I've already logged into the Wiki and updated the Test Procedures section.
> Seeing as I've found lots of IP disclosure vulnerabilities in the past
> (and future?), I for one would be more than happy to help with this.
Thanks. The whole section
Man Man schrieb:
> Hi!
Aloha!
> I am using Gmail at https://mail.google.com/ with tor.
>
> When I am at login, browser will state that the connection is only
> partially secure, ie. some items (I do not know what) are not
> encrypted. However, once I untor, I am able to get into the fully
> secu
Works here with torify, though painfully slow. You might chose a stream
which uses less bandwidth:
$ ./torify mplayer -playlist
http://wstreaming.zdf.de/zdf/veryhigh/080609_smm.asx
...
STREAM_ASF, URL:
mms://c36000-o.w.core.cdn.streamfarm.net/36000zdf/ondemand/3546zdf/zdf/zdf/08/06/080609_smm_vh.w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Karsten N. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have found this at core.onion (http://eqt5g4fuenphqinx.onion/page/31)
>
>> gpfTOR1-4: Those are operated by a front end of the German
>> Verfassungsschutz.
Wtf? :-)
> Is it only the paranoia of some individuals or disi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Geoff Down wrote:
> Presumably any problems could be avoided by changing the pseudo-tld to
> something really obscene...
.onionporn?
SCNR
Alex.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
iQCVAwUBSGYzuBYlVVSQ3uFxAQJXkgP8DOB4xMsvV3
Kasimir Gabert wrote:
> If you really need to access a flash script you could set up CGIProxy
> (http://www.jmarshall.com/tools/cgiproxy/) to route through Tor, and
> then connect to a local CGIProxy proxy with it's settings enabled
> for rewriting scripts. This will not, of course, guarantee yo
Jonathan Addington wrote:
> Can someone explain why I get this message every time I post? Or
> delete whatever email address sends this back to me?
You're maybe posting not with the same email-address as you subscribed.
> I don't post often, but it is annoying when I do.
Maybe it's just that.
A
Arjan wrote:
> My tor middle node (0.2.0.31) tries to connect to some bogon IP
> addresses and I was wondering why it does that.
[... bogons ...]
To meet general internet sanity, why not include bogons as blacklisted
into the default Tor-policy?
I know, "every node counts", but bogons don't.
Ale
misc wrote:
> Is there any way at all to get keys from LDAP server through Tor?
LDAP uses TCP, so yes, it should be working if you configure GnuPG to
use a proxy.
Alex.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Sebastian Hahn wrote:
>> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: "Praedor Atrebates"
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gesendet: 20.11.08 21:10:08 An:
>> or-talk@freehaven.net Betreff: Problems with irc because of tor?
>> Why does running tor suddenly cause me to be unable to connect to
>> freenode? I am NOT
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
