I don't know who Censorship Research Center might be, but they claim
to have a development project going for another encrypted proxy service.
However, they say it will be free software, but *not* be open source, so no
one can examine what they have done in order to look for bugs, design
On May 25, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
I don't know who Censorship Research Center might be, but they
claim
to have a development project going for another encrypted proxy
service.
However, they say it will be free software, but *not* be open
source, so no
one can examine
On Tue, 25 May 2010 03:30:34 -0400 Justin Aplin jmap...@ufl.edu
wrote:
On May 25, 2010, at 2:45 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
I don't know who Censorship Research Center might be, but they
claim
to have a development project going for another encrypted proxy
service.
However, they
On 5/25/2010 4:59 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
You may well be assuming too much. It's not easy to know at this
point because it's still undocumented vaporware. I still think the
whole thing smacks of being a honeypot for gullible humans.
I'll admit I could be totally off base. But
On Tue, 25 May 2010 05:55:34 -0400 Aplin, Justin M jmap...@ufl.edu
wrote:
On 5/25/2010 4:59 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
You may well be assuming too much. It's not easy to know at this
point because it's still undocumented vaporware. I still think the
whole thing smacks of being a
On 5/25/2010 6:22 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
Proprietary means the client companies pay for it, right? Which
means they are funding its development, right? Windows Server releases
are closed source, right? And client companies install and use it, right?
Now, none of that tells us how many
The Haystack developer was interviewed for the BBC documentary The Virtual
Revolution - this episode I think:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/documentaries/2010/03/100301_the_virtual_revolution_part_two.shtml
and see
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/8505645.stm
GD
I seem to recall that something called haystack, with a remarkably similar
webpage was the software and donations portal developed by @austinheap
during the Iran election. Since Heap's twitter is still linked from the
haystacknetworkcom page, I assume that this project remains the offspring of
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 01:45 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
I don't know who Censorship Research Center might be, but they claim
to have a development project going for another encrypted proxy service.
However, they say it will be free software, but *not* be open source, so no
one can examine what
Ted Smith schrieb:
I wonder if they'll sign the binary blobs they distribute; it would be
very easy for the police in any country to distribute their own
backdoored version (via sneakernet) and just arrest everyone who uses
it.
I wonder why they're so exclusively focused on Iran. Their
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 20:28 +0200, Olaf Selke wrote:
Ted Smith schrieb:
I wonder if they'll sign the binary blobs they distribute; it would be
very easy for the police in any country to distribute their own
backdoored version (via sneakernet) and just arrest everyone who uses
it.
I
On Tue, 25 May 2010 13:33:23 -0400 Ted Smith ted...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 01:45 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
I don't know who Censorship Research Center might be, but they claim
to have a development project going for another encrypted proxy service.
However, they say it
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 14:36 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2010 13:33:23 -0400 Ted Smith ted...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 01:45 -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
I don't know who Censorship Research Center might be, but they claim
to have a development project going for
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 04:01:43PM -0400, Ted Smith wrote:
I couldn't figure
out why the author, Kurt Knutson of WGN TV, was so taken in by something
that
isn't even available yet and about which there is so little publicly
available
information.
Maybe Tor Project should talk
because it's still undocumented vaporware. I still think the
whole
thing smacks of being a honeypot for gullible humans.
They have gotten awesome news coverage in over a dozen big-name media outlets.
http://www.censorshipresearch.org/press/ I wonder why that is.
The whole project seems
15 matches
Mail list logo
