Re[3]: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-08 Thread ygrek
> What code did you have to edit? I see the changes I have done to the code already in the SVN (probably somebody also built it and had to correct the same issues), so I think now there is no need to post them. -- Best regards, ygrekhttp://ygrek.org.ua xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] pgp

Re[2]: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-08 Thread Arrakistor
How have you gotten libevent to compile under mingw? i keep getting errors. Regards, Arrakistor Friday, September 8, 2006, 1:02:07 PM, you wrote: > On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 09:00:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote 0.8K bytes in 20 lines about: > : Can you not just use MS VC Express, which is

Re: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-08 Thread phobos
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 09:00:07PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.8K bytes in 20 lines about: : Can you not just use MS VC Express, which is free? It's "free" with conditions. The other issue was converting to the MSVCE project from previous was error prone. I failed to

Re[2]: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-07 Thread Arrakistor
Can you not just use MS VC Express, which is free? Regards, Arrakistor Thursday, September 7, 2006, 8:05:52 PM, you wrote: > On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:16:53AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote 2.4K bytes in 29 lines about: > : The past two versions of Tor (v.0.1.1.23 and v.0.1.2.1-alpha) > have

Re: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-07 Thread phobos
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:16:53AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 2.4K bytes in 29 lines about: : The past two versions of Tor (v.0.1.1.23 and v.0.1.2.1-alpha) have taken awhile to be built/released for Windows (the latter still is MIA). I know this is because you guys don't have a Windows box

Re: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-06 Thread Anothony Georgeo
Hi ygrek!ygrek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello Anothony,> The past two versions of Tor (v.0.1.1.23 and v.0.1.2.1-alpha) have> taken awhile to be built/released for Windows (the latter still is> MIA).  I know this is because you guys don't have a Windows box and> I think the person who used to do t

Re: Re[2]: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-06 Thread Mike Chiussi
On 9/6/06, Arrakistor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ygrek, I think there is a problem with this build. It keeps on reporting that the time server suddenly jumped X seconds, so it is assuming all circuits are old. What code did you have to edit? This is a problem with win32 in general, not his bui

Re[2]: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-06 Thread Arrakistor
Ygrek, I think there is a problem with this build. It keeps on reporting that the time server suddenly jumped X seconds, so it is assuming all circuits are old. What code did you have to edit? Regards, Arrakistor Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 3:24:28 PM, you wrote: > Hello Anothony, >> The p

Re[2]: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-06 Thread Arrakistor
I haven't been able to get libevent to compile for MINGW32, but had success on cygwin. I'm now buidling the latest tor, let us see how it goes... Regards, Arrakistor Wednesday, September 6, 2006, 3:21:50 PM, you wrote: >> The past two versions of Tor (v.0.1.1.23 and v.0.1.2.1-alpha) have >> ta

Re: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-06 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> The past two versions of Tor (v.0.1.1.23 and v.0.1.2.1-alpha) have > taken awhile to be built/released for Windows (the latter still is > MIA). I know this is because you guys don't have a Windows box FWIW, I don't have a Windows box either, and use the Mingw cross-compiler to build Windows bin

Re: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-06 Thread ygrek
Hello Anothony, > The past two versions of Tor (v.0.1.1.23 and v.0.1.2.1-alpha) have > taken awhile to be built/released for Windows (the latter still is > MIA).  I know this is because you guys don't have a Windows box and > I think the person who used to do the Windows build isn't doing so anym

Re: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-06 Thread Anothony Georgeo
--- thalunil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anothony Georgeo wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The past two versions of Tor (v.0.1.1.23 and > v.0.1.2.1-alpha) have taken awhile to be > built/released for Windows (the latter still is > MIA). I know this is because you guys don't have a > Windows box and I th

Re: Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-06 Thread thalunil
Anothony Georgeo wrote: > Hi, > > The past two versions of Tor (v.0.1.1.23 and v.0.1.2.1-alpha) have taken > awhile to be built/released for Windows (the latter still is MIA). I know > this is because you guys don't have a Windows box and I think the person who > used to do the Windows build i

Attn: Nick or Roger: An offer to enable you to release Widows builds

2006-09-06 Thread Anothony Georgeo
Hi,The past two versions of Tor (v.0.1.1.23 and v.0.1.2.1-alpha) have taken awhile to be built/released for Windows (the latter still is MIA).  I know this is because you guys don't have a Windows box and I think the person who used to do the Windows build isn't doing so anymore?I would wager that