On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 09:53:40 -0500 Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 11:35:23PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> However, I would be interested in knowing why I see this:
>>
>> -rw--- 1 _tor _tor365907 Nov 30 23:10 cached-consensus
>> -rw---
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 11:35:23PM -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
> However, I would be interested in knowing why I see this:
>
> -rw--- 1 _tor _tor365907 Nov 30 23:10 cached-consensus
> -rw--- 1 _tor _tor 39096827 Nov 30 23:11 cached-descriptors
> -rw--- 1 _tor _tor17
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:13:33 -0500 Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:47:39AM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> > Yes, my directory authorities are using way too much ram too. It appears
>> > that we introduced something bad in 0.1.2.x that wasn't present
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:47:39AM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> > Yes, my directory authorities are using way too much ram too. It appears
> > that we introduced something bad in 0.1.2.x that wasn't present in
> > 0.1.1.x.
It occurs to me that all of the ram bloating reports have come from
Lin
4 matches
Mail list logo