> : > a bobnjoe browser
> : For the crass foreigners among us -- what does this idiom mean?
> Bob & Joe's Bait, Tackle, and Web Browsers [...] Sorry for the confusion.
Quite the opposite -- thanks to you for the snippet of local colour.
Juliusz
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 12:54:30AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.1K bytes in
5 lines about:
: > a bobnjoe browser
:
: For the crass foreigners among us -- what does this idiom mean?
It's a phobosism as a result of growing up in a rural area. I meant it
as a very small population of users. S
> a bobnjoe browser
For the crass foreigners among us -- what does this idiom mean?
Juliusz
On Monday 15 October 2007 20:37:58 Kasimir Gabert wrote:
> > On 10/15/07, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sunday 14 October 2007 19:50:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > > : Spoof http-headers as though a US e
> On 10/15/07, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sunday 14 October 2007 19:50:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.9K
> > bytes in 30 lines about:
> > > : Do:
> > > : Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascri
People will know that you are in the UAE if you are browsing websites
that are only for people and used by people in the UAE.
Kasimir Gabert
On 10/15/07, Robert Hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 14 October 2007 19:50:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0
On Sunday 14 October 2007 19:50:38 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.9K
bytes in 30 lines about:
> : Do:
> : Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?)
> : (browser)
>
> Arguably, unless you're using BobnJoe's br
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > It's fairly easy to convert the adblock plus 'easylist' into a polipo
> > forbidden file.
>
> Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd be glad to link
> to it from the Polipo page.
>
> Juli
On Sat, Oct 13, 2007 at 09:21:40AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.9K bytes in
30 lines about:
: Do:
: Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?) (browser)
Arguably, unless you're using BobnJoe's browser, any of the popular ones
should provide sufficient numbers (firefox
Ben Wilhelm schrieb:
> Pick the most common user-agent and use it. That's probably whatever the
> latest version of Firefox returns.
Ok, I use (only a few examples):
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; sk-SK; rv:1.8.1.6)
Gecko/20070824 Firefox/2.0.0.6
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; de-DE
TOR Admin (gpfTOR1) wrote:
Robert Hogan schrieb:
Do:
Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?) (browser)
I think, it is nessecary. Do this job in browser, because no proxy can
do it for SSL-encrypted stuff. And change the fake time by time.
I disagree. Don't do an
Robert Hogan schrieb:
> Do:
> Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?) (browser)
I think, it is nessecary. Do this job in browser, because no proxy can
do it for SSL-encrypted stuff. And change the fake time by time.
You may try showmyip with and without javascript. In
On Friday 12 October 2007 00:26:46 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:57:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K
bytes in 29 lines about:
> : Keeping track of all the things you should turn off or get a proxy to
> : tweak makes my feeble head hurt.
>
> The latest torbutton-dev
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:57:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K bytes in
29 lines about:
: Keeping track of all the things you should turn off or get a proxy to tweak
: makes my feeble head hurt.
The latest torbutton-dev releases handle most of this for you.
--
Andrew
On Thursday 11 October 2007, Robert Hogan wrote:
> On Wednesday 10 October 2007 13:20:31 Pat Double wrote:
> > On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > > > You should use RefControl <
> > > > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/953 > to spoof
> > > > referrers head
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 13:20:31 Pat Double wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > > You should use RefControl <
> > > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/953 > to spoof
> > > referrers headers, not Polipo, as RefControl does HTTPS and HTTP.
> >
> >
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 07:32:31AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K
> bytes in 39 lines about:
> : > Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd be glad to link
> : > to it from the Polipo page.
> :
> : If phobos doesn't have a script I'll most likely write one. The problem
> would
>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 07:32:31AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K bytes in
39 lines about:
: > Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd be glad to link
: > to it from the Polipo page.
:
: If phobos doesn't have a script I'll most likely write one. The problem would
: be that the
On Wednesday 10 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > If phobos doesn't have a script I'll most likely write one. The
> > problem would be that the 'easylist' also includes a whitelist at
> > the end, I assume that all patterns are scanned from start to end
> > and if something is blacklisted
> If phobos doesn't have a script I'll most likely write one. The
> problem would be that the 'easylist' also includes a whitelist at
> the end, I assume that all patterns are scanned from start to end
> and if something is blacklisted AND whitelisted, it is
> allowed. AFAIK Polipo only provides a
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > It's fairly easy to convert the adblock plus 'easylist' into a polipo
> > forbidden file.
>
> Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd be glad to link
> to it from the Polipo page.
If phobos doesn't have a script I'll most likel
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > You should use RefControl <
> > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/953 > to spoof
> > referrers headers, not Polipo, as RefControl does HTTPS and HTTP.
>
> Yep. In all cases, doing things in the browser is better than doin
> It's fairly easy to convert the adblock plus 'easylist' into a polipo
> forbidden file.
Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd be glad to link
to it from the Polipo page.
Juliusz
> You should use RefControl <
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/953 > to spoof
> referrers headers, not Polipo, as RefControl does HTTPS and HTTP.
Yep. In all cases, doing things in the browser is better than doing
them in the proxy.
However, I understand that Pat is trying
> What about censoring ETag, Last-Modified and If-Modified-Since ? Those are
> used to send info to the client that will be send back to the server, hence
> something can be encoded there to identify the machine.
Don't censor ETag and Last-Modified under any circumstances. Polipo
will survive a
Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> censorReferer=maybe
> Yep. This is a reasonable compromise -- doesn't leak too much memory
> while not breaking most sites.
You should use RefControl <
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/953 > to spoof referrers
heade
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Any suggestion for additional censorings?
Thanks for the info, I'll apply it.
What about censoring ETag, Last-Modified and If-Modified-Since ? Those are
used to send info to the client that will be send back to the server, hence
something c
Hi,
> I am considering changing the Incognito LiveCD to use Polipo.
Excellent news.
> Polipo config -
> https://tor-svn.freehaven.net/svn/incognito/branches/polipo/root_overlay/etc/polipo/
First point -- you'll definitely want to set disableLocalInterface.
Since you're running with no on-disk
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:30:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K bytes in
32 lines about:
: > I did a search for AdBlock and found AdBlock and AdBlock Plus. Any idea
which
: > to use?
It's fairly easy to convert the adblock plus 'easylist' into a polipo
forbidden file.
--
Andrew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pat Double wrote:
> I did a search for AdBlock and found AdBlock and AdBlock Plus. Any idea which
> to use?
my personal taste goes for adblock plus: more colors, nice graphics, the
automagically updated block-lists and the nice "block tab" on top of
f
On Friday 05 October 2007, Andrew Del Vecchio wrote:
> 4: Yes. Also, if possible, have HTTP referers disabled as well.
HTTP referers is being done in
https://tor-svn.freehaven.net/svn/incognito/branches/polipo/root_overlay/etc/polipo/config
I did a search for AdBlock and found AdBlock and AdBloc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
4: Yes. Also, if possible, have HTTP referers disabled as well.
Keep up the good work!
~Andrew
Pat Double wrote:
> Incognito is a Live CD aimed towards anonymity. (Links given
> below).
>
> I am considering changing the Incognito LiveCD to use Polip
Incognito is a Live CD aimed towards anonymity. (Links given below).
I am considering changing the Incognito LiveCD to use Polipo. I have a branch
with it enabled. Currently it is using a squid/privoxy combination. I need to
know:
1. An appropriate polipo config.
2. Features in privoxy that shou
33 matches
Mail list logo
