The first rule is freedom!!!
El mié, 28-02-2007 a las 06:32 -0800, Mr. Blue escribió:
> But even THIS world MUST have some rules.
> Do you have rules in your own house where you live?
> Imagine it without them.
--
--
Devel in Precio http://www.pas-world.com
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 08:51:32AM -0800, Michael_google gmail_Gersten
wrote:
[...]
> "He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy
> from oppression".
There are many reasons why I do not think it is a good idea to add any
censorship code to Tor. That's one of them. L
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Sorry, but this is very relevant to the very reason of Tor's
existence. I know that talk about any religion, especially
Christianity today spooks most folks, but it's very relevant to this
subject.
Paul Syverson wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
> I'm doing a LOT of trimming on this reply.
>
>> Yes, and this is, given the limits of technology, best left to the
>> realm of The Good Lord to handle ( the rules are in The Bible if only
>> people would abide
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 08:51:32AM -0800, Michael_google gmail_Gersten wrote:
> I'm doing a LOT of trimming on this reply.
>
> > Yes, and this is, given the limits of technology, best left to the
> > realm of The Good Lord to handle ( the rules are in The Bible if only
> > people would abide by th
I'm doing a LOT of trimming on this reply.
Yes, and this is, given the limits of technology, best left to the
realm of The Good Lord to handle ( the rules are in The Bible if only
people would abide by them. There is something that the vast majority
of people fail to take into consideration
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Mr. Blue wrote:
> You better BET that if anyone is
against censorship, then I AM in a
> FIRST LINE!
> Being free and anonym is a main reason why I like Tor, so I could
> get rid of those greedy I-see-all govs eyes.
>
> But even THIS world MUST ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
In regards to the technical aspect of Tor, yes it is off topic, but in
regards to Tor's actual purpose, it is very much on topic. While this
lists purpose it primarily technical, the political, social, moral
issues regarding Tor also need to be addr
Poor kids DON'T!!!
Okay .. we're seriously off-topic here, but many a person's rights are
trampled because :
"it's for the children..."
There is no "okay" form of censorship. A spade is a spade is a spade.
If you believe in censoring this or that, under any guise, then maybe
TOR isn't the
Hi,
and i really think this thread _is_ off topic, so please stop posting to it.
On Mit, 28 Feb 2007, Mr. Blue wrote:
> All options are opened... and in this process we don't need to abide to any
> laws.
--
Florian Reitmeir
You better BET that if anyone is against censorship, then I AM in a FIRST LINE!
Being free and anonym is a main reason why I like Tor, so I could get rid of
those greedy I-see-all govs eyes.
But even THIS world MUST have some rules.
Do you have rules in your own house where you live?
Imagine it w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
While I agree that the use the pedophiles make of the Tor network is
at best reprehensible, and it does constitute a public relations
problem for Tor, you have to consider this quote which is a truth that
most people are unfortunately unable to c
> I would just like to say that we should report that alolita.com because it
> is connected to bunch of PEDOPHILES!!!
>
> Is must be banned from Tor netowork and it should also be reported to
> authorities.
Hey, wait a minute. You're talking about Censorship. Don't you realize that?
Or do you wan
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:19:36PM +0100, Lasse Øverlier wrote:
> If we already stop spam and bittorrent I think this is much worse!
I disagree (as a parent, and a Tor operator who got a BKA case about
pedophilia on his hands, which is still open -- at least there is yet
no usual offical letter
-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: Norwegian DNS compromized
I would just like to say that we should report that alolita.com because
it is connected to bunch of PEDOPHILES!!!
Is must be banned from Tor netowork and it should also be reported to
authorities.
Michael_google gmail_Gersten &l
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:19:36PM +0100, Lasse Øverlier wrote:
>
> If this is true, the answer to the strange DNS query is likely that
> NextGenTel is using a filter service developed by the Norwegian Police
> on their DNS queries to stop this type of traffic. I think that being
> registered here
If this is true, the answer to the strange DNS query is likely that
NextGenTel is using a filter service developed by the Norwegian Police
on their DNS queries to stop this type of traffic. I think that being
registered here is a verification for that the address already is
reported to (at least)
I would just like to say that we should report that alolita.com because it is
connected to bunch of PEDOPHILES!!!
Is must be banned from Tor netowork and it should also be reported to
authorities.
Michael_google gmail_Gersten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The first test, where alolita.com resolves
Before getting too "OMG!", keep in mind that the second set of tests
-- looking up tor.eff.org and tor.linuxreviews.org, the name server is
simply saying "I don't know, here is where you can get accurate
information". That is normal.
The first test, where alolita.com resolves to different address
This is probably a coincidence, but during and after my talk at HackCon
this month a technical guy from NextGenTel was furious over the use of
Tor, and wanted me to recommend not setting up Tor servers! He claimed
that the use of Tor at an ISP (he claimed this on behalf of every ISP)
was against t
$ dig +trace alolita.com
alolita.com.3600IN A 69.5.162.133
dig @217.13.4.21 alolita.com
alolita.com.1800IN A 80.202.4.7
217.13.4.21 is a DNS server which belongs to Norwegian ISP NextGenTel.
** EVEN MORE ALARMING: **
$ dig @18.244.0.188 tor
21 matches
Mail list logo
