Paul Syverson wrote:
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:46:20AM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
>
>> Thus spake Paul Syverson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>>
>>
...
I don't understand a single bit of mathematics in this paper.
Although one symbol looks like Integration function.
Damn.. why ar
On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 02:46:20AM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake Paul Syverson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Anyway, the main reason I'm writing is that my objection was not just
> > that the GPA was too strong but that it was too weak. Thinking you
> > could have an adversary powerful enough
.mspx
Regards,
Tony.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Eugen Leitl
Sent: Wed 30/05/2007 13:57
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: Sampled Traffic Analysis by Internet-Exchange-Level Adversaries
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Tony wrote:
> Windows
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Tony wrote:
> Windows has offered over 10 Gigabit throughput on a workstation (running
> Windows Server 2003) since 2005...
>
> http://www.amd.com/us-en/assets/content_type/DownloadableAssets/AMD_10_GbE_Performance_Paper_August05.pdf
Totally different
Thus spake Paul Syverson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Anyway, the main reason I'm writing is that my objection was not just
> that the GPA was too strong but that it was too weak. Thinking you
> could have an adversary powerful enough to monitor all the links
> necessary to watch your whole large networ
On 5/29/07, Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Windows has offered over 10 Gigabit throughput on a workstation (running
Windows Server 2003) since 2005...
veering off topic here, but the vast majority of 10GigE devices have
hardware TCP offload support, which is how OS stacks can push toward
the
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 04:23:51AM -0700, coderman wrote:
> On 5/28/07, Steven Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >...
> >I do think that a global passive adversary is stronger than the real
> >world situation. For example, such an adversary could read traffic
> >between two computers in my offic
] on behalf of Eugen Leitl
Sent: Mon 28/05/2007 21:22
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: Sampled Traffic Analysis by Internet-Exchange-Level Adversaries
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 04:23:51AM -0700, coderman wrote:
> ah, agreed; i was unaware of such a myth, and the thought of someone
> try
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 04:23:51AM -0700, coderman wrote:
> ah, agreed; i was unaware of such a myth, and the thought of someone
> trying to inspect 10GigE with a workstation and wireshark is comical.
Solaris 10 TCP/IP stack rewrite claims 10 GBit/s throughput, but I
have not seen this independen
On 5/28/07, Steven Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
I do think that a global passive adversary is stronger than the real
world situation. For example, such an adversary could read traffic
between two computers in my office, which I suspect is outside of the
NSA's capabilities, unless I were
On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 03:36:05AM -0700, coderman wrote:
> you state "an assumption that the global passive adversary is
> unrealistic". is this really true in anonymity research circles?
The convention in anonymity research is to assume a global passive
adversary, since then any system shown to
On 5/28/07, coderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... is the assumption that inspection at
OC/WDM layers is too cumbersome/expensive for all but the previously
mentioned TLA/$gov adversaries?
one more comment that ties into your mention PCIe bus limitations.
previous research on monitoring high s
On 5/28/07, Steven Murdoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
... an experiment to establish how diverse the topology of the Tor network
is -- an important component of how secure it is against traffic
analysis. ...
I've now finished the draft version of the resulting paper...
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/
Some of you might remember my email to this list in February, where I
asked for help from operators of Tor nodes in the UK [1]. This was for
an experiment to establish how diverse the topology of the Tor network
is -- an important component of how secure it is against traffic
analysis. Thanks to al
14 matches
Mail list logo
