Re: Sending mail through TOR/Socks

2006-07-19 Thread 4non ym0us
Is it possible your mail service can use port 587? I don't know how many exit nodes allow that (nor do I know how to quickly check), but I'm using 587 with SMTP over SSL, and it seems to work fine. Check my headers if you don't believe me. :-) Just tested this and it works (of course Murphy made

Re: Sending mail through TOR/Socks

2006-07-19 Thread 4non ym0us
On 7/18/06, Roger Dingledine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: No, Tor is smarter than that: your Tor client knows the exit policies of the Tor servers, and it picks an appropriate exit node. Ah, that's good to know, I had certainly hoped the developers wasn't so careless as to overlook something like

Re: Sending mail through TOR/Socks

2006-07-17 Thread Jay Goodman Tamboli
On 2006.07.17, at 13:33, Roger Dingledine wrote: On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 07:20:13PM +0200, Marco Gruss wrote: 4non ym0us wrote: I'm aware of this and believe that it's a lot easier to convince my webhost, if it comes down to it, to not block TOR exit nodes which many does not appear to be acce

Re: Sending mail through TOR/Socks

2006-07-17 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Mon, Jul 17, 2006 at 07:20:13PM +0200, Marco Gruss wrote: > 4non ym0us wrote: > >I'm aware of this and believe that it's a lot easier to convince my > >webhost, if it comes down to it, to not block TOR exit nodes which > >many does not appear to be accepting SMTP anyway, compared to if my > >IPs

Re: Sending mail through TOR/Socks

2006-07-17 Thread Marco Gruss
Hi, 4non ym0us wrote: I'm aware of this and believe that it's a lot easier to convince my webhost, if it comes down to it, to not block TOR exit nodes which many does not appear to be accepting SMTP anyway, compared to if my IPs are being used for massive spammage. I think this is the main reas

Re: Sending mail through TOR/Socks

2006-07-17 Thread Michael Holstein
what about configuring your SMTP/POP3 port to something else? Sure .. if you can find a MTA that will do that (and of course you could always set one up, but that'd totally defeat the purpose of trying to hide the path). Really, you're better off with tools like Mixmaster. The alternative is

Re: Sending mail through TOR/Socks

2006-07-17 Thread 4non ym0us
On 7/17/06, Florian Reitmeir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, http://tor.eff.org/faq-abuse.html.en in short Tor is really the wrong tool to send anonymous mails, maybe mixmaster is want you want. I'm aware of this and believe that it's a lot easier to convince my webhost, if it comes down to it,

Re: Sending mail through TOR/Socks

2006-07-17 Thread 4non ym0us
On 7/17/06, Matej Kovacic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, what about configuring your SMTP/POP3 port to something else? bye, Matej I don't have control over the SMTP server on the webhost side so that's not really an option. :(

Re: Sending mail through TOR/Socks

2006-07-17 Thread Matej Kovacic
Hi, what about configuring your SMTP/POP3 port to something else? bye, Matej

Re: Sending mail through TOR/Socks

2006-07-17 Thread Florian Reitmeir
Hi, http://tor.eff.org/faq-abuse.html.en in short Tor is really the wrong tool to send anonymous mails, maybe mixmaster is want you want. On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, 4non ym0us wrote: > I don't know if anybody is doing the same thing but I've set up one of > my personal domains smtp/pop3 emails to use

Sending mail through TOR/Socks

2006-07-17 Thread 4non ym0us
I don't know if anybody is doing the same thing but I've set up one of my personal domains smtp/pop3 emails to use Thunderbird/SOCKS/Tor so that the receipients can't pinpoint my IP. However, I notice a persistent phenomenon with this setup is that receiving emails usually works, but sending mail