On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 09:50:16PM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> > Is this with the tor rpm shipped by Fedora?
>
> yes
>
> > We don't support (or use,
> > or like, or recommend) the fedora tor rpm.
>
> OK. Is this ideological, or because it's no good?
Mostly the latter.
There was a little is
I would go with the Debian init-script. I have used it for years without
any problems. Much better that Tor's own contributed init-script. It is
much nicer to wait the process to die than to kill -9 them and cut users
active connections.
I recommend that you take a look at the tor-debian-init-scr
On 06/25/2009 04:39 AM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Is this with the tor rpm shipped by Fedora?
yes
> We don't support (or use,
> or like, or recommend) the fedora tor rpm.
OK. Is this ideological, or because it's no good? I can work to fix
the latter (I don't think anybody at Fedora wants a ba
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:47:56AM -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
> I noticed a problem with the init script I have with the tor package on
> Fedora 10.
Is this with the tor rpm shipped by Fedora? We don't support (or use,
or like, or recommend) the fedora tor rpm.
> The 'restart' command (just a
If the package came from Fedoras repository they may use their own
init-scripts. Contact Fedoras bugreporting.
M
Bill McGonigle wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I noticed a problem with the init script I have with the tor package on
> Fedora 10. The 'restart' command (just a start and stop) sends a -INT
Hi folks,
I noticed a problem with the init script I have with the tor package on
Fedora 10. The 'restart' command (just a start and stop) sends a -INT
to the running process, but doesn't account for ShutdownWaitLength. It
looks like the old server instance unbinds, so the new one can start up,
6 matches
Mail list logo
