On 08/25/2009 02:52 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On 08/25/2009 10:53 AM, Sadece Gercekler wrote:
> > This means when I uncheck the Enable option of Privoxy, I turn off
>> filtering, but the proxy stays. And my current Firefox 3.5.2 + Tor +
>> Privoxy with no filter configuration its not less safe th
On 08/25/2009 10:53 AM, Sadece Gercekler wrote:
> This means when I uncheck the Enable option of Privoxy, I turn off
> filtering, but the proxy stays. And my current Firefox 3.5.2 + Tor +
> Privoxy with no filter configuration its not less safe than the
> polipo configuration in the Tor browser bu
I understood right.
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, Andrew Lewman wrote:
From: Andrew Lewman
Subject: Re: Something that I don't understand about privoxy
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Date: Tuesday, 25 August, 2009, 2:38 PM
On 08/25/2009 09:37 AM, Sadece Gercekler wrote:
> So here are my questions:
On 08/25/2009 09:37 AM, Sadece Gercekler wrote:
> So here are my questions: First of all, if privoxy is needed for
> security, why wasn't it there with the former package? Did I
> compromise security when I used without the blue Privoxy icon? Do I
> compromise security when I use with the Enable o
I first installed the Tor+browser bundle (the one packaged as a portable
installation) it worked perfectly, I could see the little green Tor icon in the
notification area (only the Tor icon). I used yahoo mailI with javascript
enabled and had no problems.
Then I decided to delete everything and
5 matches
Mail list logo
