On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:35:50 -0600
Jim wrote:
> Would it make sense to add that link, or some other link, to the
> message Tor prints out so the casual user can get some idea of what
> the message means?
Perhaps more relevant is this,
http://dud.inf.tu-dresden.de/Anon_Terminology.shtml
--
Andre
and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:48:24PM +0200, spacem...@gmail.com wrote 0.4K bytes
in 9 lines about:
: why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for
: strong anonymity"? If not Tor, what should we use for strong
: anonymity? excluding Freenet and
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:48:24PM +0200, spacem...@gmail.com wrote 0.4K bytes
in 9 lines about:
: why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for
: strong anonymity"? If not Tor, what should we use for strong
: anonymity? excluding Freenet and cryptography apps.
The challen
On 8/9/2010 6:38 PM, Michael Gomboc wrote:
If they would say "Do rely on it for strong anonymity" would you feel
more secure? :-)
2010/8/9 spacemarc mailto:spacem...@gmail.com>>
Hi all,
why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for
strong anonymity"? If not
If they would say "Do rely on it for strong anonymity" would you feel more
secure? :-)
2010/8/9 spacemarc
> Hi all,
> why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for
> strong anonymity"? If not Tor, what should we use for strong
> anonymity? excluding Freenet and cryptogra
Hi all,
why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for
strong anonymity"? If not Tor, what should we use for strong
anonymity? excluding Freenet and cryptography apps.
regards
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-m
6 matches
Mail list logo