Re: Tor notice

2010-08-10 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Mon, 09 Aug 2010 22:35:50 -0600 Jim wrote: > Would it make sense to add that link, or some other link, to the > message Tor prints out so the casual user can get some idea of what > the message means? Perhaps more relevant is this, http://dud.inf.tu-dresden.de/Anon_Terminology.shtml -- Andre

Re: Tor notice

2010-08-09 Thread Jim
and...@torproject.org wrote: On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:48:24PM +0200, spacem...@gmail.com wrote 0.4K bytes in 9 lines about: : why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for : strong anonymity"? If not Tor, what should we use for strong : anonymity? excluding Freenet and

Re: Tor notice

2010-08-09 Thread andrew
On Mon, Aug 09, 2010 at 09:48:24PM +0200, spacem...@gmail.com wrote 0.4K bytes in 9 lines about: : why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for : strong anonymity"? If not Tor, what should we use for strong : anonymity? excluding Freenet and cryptography apps. The challen

Re: Tor notice

2010-08-09 Thread David Carlson
On 8/9/2010 6:38 PM, Michael Gomboc wrote: If they would say "Do rely on it for strong anonymity" would you feel more secure? :-) 2010/8/9 spacemarc mailto:spacem...@gmail.com>> Hi all, why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for strong anonymity"? If not

Re: Tor notice

2010-08-09 Thread Michael Gomboc
If they would say "Do rely on it for strong anonymity" would you feel more secure? :-) 2010/8/9 spacemarc > Hi all, > why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for > strong anonymity"? If not Tor, what should we use for strong > anonymity? excluding Freenet and cryptogra

Tor notice

2010-08-09 Thread spacemarc
Hi all, why in every Tor version (a/b/stable) there is "Do not rely on it for strong anonymity"? If not Tor, what should we use for strong anonymity? excluding Freenet and cryptography apps. regards *** To unsubscribe, send an e-m