Mike Perry wrote:
(snip)
We are not in the habit of providing features that are demonstrably
bad for anonymity for no reason, and I am certainly not going to
give such work priority over much more important things such as
improving the performance of the network as a whole (for ex, my latest
work
Thus spake and...@torproject.org (and...@torproject.org):
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 05:27:21AM -0500, twinkletoedtur...@safe-mail.net
> wrote 5.1K bytes in 106 lines about:
> : This has already been discussed previously, I was moving on to ask if
> : this feature could be added, not debated.
>
>
>
> I've recently had conversations with some activists in Europe who want
> to run unpublished exit nodes (meaning they set PublishServerDescriptor
> 0 in their torrc). Of course, one risk is the only people using this
> unlisted exit node are those in the social graph of the activists.
>
Slight
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 05:27:21AM -0500, twinkletoedtur...@safe-mail.net wrote
5.1K bytes in 106 lines about:
: This has already been discussed previously, I was moving on to ask if
: this feature could be added, not debated.
The simple answer right now is no. There is exactly one person workin
Perhaps the best choice would be the one used by the most people.
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/01/tracking-by-user-agent
Cheers,
Michael Holstein
Cleveland State University
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@to
Marco Bonetti:
"I'm not getting the point of why there should be choice: if the
users using this feature start changing they UA, the blending will be a
lot more weak."
This has already been discussed previously, I was moving on to ask if
this feature could be added, not debated.
"If you really n
On 02/01/2010 01:09 PM, G-Lo ♂ wrote:
> twinkletoedtur...@safe-mail.net a écrit :
>> In light of the Panopticlick thread and this question being asked in
> the past with no reasonable answer given via Torbutton's author, I
> appeal to Torbutton's author:
>> Please provide us with more of a choice i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
twinkletoedtur...@safe-mail.net a écrit :
> In light of the Panopticlick thread and this question being asked in
the past with no reasonable answer given via Torbutton's author, I
appeal to Torbutton's author:
>
> Please provide us with more of a ch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
could you dig a little more on the need of a choice of different user
agents? I'm not getting the point of why there should be choice: if the
users using this feature start changing they UA, the blending will be a
lot more weak.
If you really need
In light of the Panopticlick thread and this question being asked in the past
with no reasonable answer given via Torbutton's author, I appeal to Torbutton's
author:
Please provide us with more of a choice in user agents. The user agent in
Torbutton is not updated often enough and we should hav
10 matches
Mail list logo
