> the exact keys may vary from win98/2k/xp, as they often do. (are you
> using a fixed list of keys to look for, or is there a more in depth
> search for particular key names/values? a static list will be
> brittle)
I am supposing it will variable. I will naturally have to verify it.
And then ag
On 11/26/06, coderman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
why the focus on automatic updates? [we thought we'd need these at
one point, but really, it opened up more problems than it solved.
additional care before releases has proved sufficient]
i am referring to the developers of janusvm, NOT Tor,
On 11/26/06, Arrakistor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
I will check out the claims about the registry. I performed a diff on
it from running and after and found only the SSL seed value changed.
Perhaps there are some other changes.
the exact keys may vary from win98/2k/xp, as they often do. (a
Hello Steven,
I will check out the claims about the registry. I performed a diff on
it from running and after and found only the SSL seed value changed.
Perhaps there are some other changes. I will check those out for sure.
Regarding the rest of the registry keys, if they are indeed persistant
and
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 03:17:31PM -0600, Arrakistor wrote:
> Until an official doc is produced for helping users compile and
> understand the choice that were made, the answer to all your questions
> is here: http://www.torrify.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=1800
I was also interested in the an
5 matches
Mail list logo
