"Anthony DiPierro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/28/07, Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Anthony DiPierro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > That brings up an idea, though. Are there certain common perfectly
> > > legitimate things that exit nodes are being used for, that maybe
On 1/27/07, Seth David Schoen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anthony DiPierro writes:
> Or what about a hidden service for reading web pages in general?
> Something which doesn't support POST (or maybe even GET), so is much
> less likely to be used abusively. Is this feasible?
The current director
On 1/28/07, Fabian Keil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Anthony DiPierro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That brings up an idea, though. Are there certain common perfectly
> legitimate things that exit nodes are being used for, that maybe some
> hidden services could be set up to take the load off?
On Sun, Jan 28, 2007 at 04:05:58PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
> I think it would be interesting to know if any single person
> in Germany got more than one letter, or first a letter for one
> investigation and than a personal visit for another one.
Anecdotally, the complaint rate with Tor is typic
"Anthony DiPierro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That brings up an idea, though. Are there certain common perfectly
> legitimate things that exit nodes are being used for, that maybe some
> hidden services could be set up to take the load off?
I guess the most obvious and perfectly legitimate thi
Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 11:12:01AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Perhaps someone could draft a generic response letter to be sent to
> > law enforcement if a server operator is contact and post it online or
> > even include it in the package.
>
> I
Seth David Schoen writes:
> Anthony DiPierro writes:
>
> > Or what about a hidden service for reading web pages in general?
> > Something which doesn't support POST (or maybe even GET), so is much
> > less likely to be used abusively. Is this feasible?
>
> The current directory scheme does allo
Anthony DiPierro writes:
> Or what about a hidden service for reading web pages in general?
> Something which doesn't support POST (or maybe even GET), so is much
> less likely to be used abusively. Is this feasible?
The current directory scheme does allow (in fact, requires) policies
to be spec
On 1/27/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Problem still exists though, that Tor needs more exit nodes. If nobody is
willing to run an exit server the performance of the network suffers
dramatically.
If *nobody* is willing to run an exit server the performance drops to
zero (at l
On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 11:12:01AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Problem still exists though, that Tor needs more exit nodes. If nobody is
You can buy a fast exit server, and choose it as your default exit.
You can also build a private Tor network, and limit it to paying
customers. (I'm welc
On Jan 27, 2007, at 11:12:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Problem still exists though, that Tor needs more exit nodes. If
nobody is
willing to run an exit server the performance of the network suffers
dramatically. I personally find the performance of the network to be
almost unusable, so I choo
Problem still exists though, that Tor needs more exit nodes. If nobody is
willing to run an exit server the performance of the network suffers
dramatically. I personally find the performance of the network to be
almost unusable, so I choose other pay-for anonymity services. This is
not a bash of T
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 11:24:07PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.9K bytes in
51 lines about:
: Yeah I read that but I can't find any option for that in Vidalia, was
: it integrated into Vidalia yet or just in Tor? Sadly, I don't know how
: to set options for Tor without Vidalia. ;)
It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yeah I read that but I can't find any option for that in Vidalia, was
it integrated into Vidalia yet or just in Tor? Sadly, I don't know how
to set options for Tor without Vidalia. ;)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:22:08PM +0
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 08:22:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 2.0K bytes in
54 lines about:
: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
: Hash: SHA1
:
: Well, but that limit only respects the INcoming traffic. I never
: understood why one can't set a limit for OUTgoing traffic and that is
However, I don't know what that -HUP is about.
man signal
(-HUP is 'hangup' .. )
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, but that limit only respects the INcoming traffic. I never
understood why one can't set a limit for OUTgoing traffic and that is
a big problem. However, I don't know what that -HUP is about. But it
sounds like something Vidalia users can't use m
It might be easier for you to have the tor traffic routed through a
gateway machine and have it limit bandwidth.
On 1/11/07, gabrix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
xiando wrote:
>> I think this is a valid point. I ran an exit-node for a short while at
home
>> without thinking too much about it. The h
xiando wrote:
>> I think this is a valid point. I ran an exit-node for a short while at home
>> without thinking too much about it. The huge amount of traffic I was
>> attracting (even within minutes of booting up) made me shut it off for the
>> sake of personal convenience, but I don't think I wil
xiando wrote:
I think this is a valid point. I ran an exit-node for a short while at home
without thinking too much about it. The huge amount of traffic I was
attracting (even within minutes of booting up) made me shut it off for the
sake of personal convenience, but I don't think I will ever go
> I think this is a valid point. I ran an exit-node for a short while at home
> without thinking too much about it. The huge amount of traffic I was
> attracting (even within minutes of booting up) made me shut it off for the
> sake of personal convenience, but I don't think I will ever go back -
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 08:28:48PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 2.0K bytes in
43 lines about:
: These days I generally run a middle-man node but even that has started to
feel
: inappropriate for home use. I would be amazed if regular appearances on
: directory servers does not blink wildly on
The only advantage to running a an exit-server at home would be
increased anonymity because you could always say "a tor user did it".
Also, I think running middleman servers does expose you to more
scrutiny since the government doesn't like tor or encrypted traffic of
any kind however I don't thin
Robert Hogan wrote:
* From a common-sense, peace-of-mind point of view, is running an exit-node
strictly for co-located servers? Does anyone here run one at home? If so,
have you had second thoughts?
I run one at home, but it's on a dedicated IP, within a virtual machine.
I wouldn't want t
On Monday 08 January 2007 11:42, Alexander Janssen wrote:
> And it also should be pointed out omce again that it would be a rather
> stupid idea to run a TOR exit-node at home, for a dynamic IP-address
> is blinking wildly on their radar. The possible consequences are left
> up to your imagination.
Hi,
I'm really sorry to hear about the persecution over there. This
certainly does seem like a campaign against tor. It's important to
remember that although it may seem like an us vs them situation, we
A few days ago I was surfing at our government's website and found
something about electronic
I'm really sorry to hear about the persecution over there. This
certainly does seem like a campaign against tor. It's important to
remember that although it may seem like an us vs them situation, we
need to work together and band together to not only defeat the
campaign but to make progress. Solid
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:18:10PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Is this isn't an active discouragement campaign, it certainly
> feels that way.
At 23C3, I spoke to several people who told me about chats with law
enforcement where a German fed was intentionally bothering Tor operators
with the goal
Hi Eugen,
On 1/8/07, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:18:10PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> Is this isn't an active discouragement campaign, it certainly
> feels that way.
Not necessarily; if the BKA gets aware of a crime, they *must*
investigate (see also ยง 258a
On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 12:18:10PM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
>
> Have gotten a facsimile with similiar content as
> http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Jan-2007/msg00051.html
> today (router redgene, end of contract 2006.12.12, possibly
> seized at the hoster several days before contract
> terminatio
Have gotten a facsimile with similiar content as
http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Jan-2007/msg00051.html
today (router redgene, end of contract 2006.12.12, possibly
seized at the hoster several days before contract
termination since unavailable, hoster didn't reply to
the trouble tickets I posted
31 matches
Mail list logo
