Hi list,
for some unknown reason my exit stopped publishing its descriptor.
Bandwidth dropped to below 3 MBit/s and the number of new tcp
connections dropped to less than 10 per second. Both seems to be
reasonable. Good! But the tor process still owns about 8000(!) open tcp
sessions in establishe
Csaba Kiraly wrote:
>>> Is your openssl old or broken, perhaps? Alternatively, something
>>> outside your system is breaking tls.
>>>
>>>
>> While logging at "info" per Nick's request for the out-of-date
>> directory
>> bug in 0.2.0.9-alpha, I saw thousands of the second message above.
Scott Bennett wrote:
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 22:26:20 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 05:52:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.6K bytes in
17 lines about:
: Nov 05 17:49:03.989 [debug] TLS error: unexpected close while reading
: Nov 05 17:49:03.989 [info] connectio
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 22:26:20 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 05:52:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.6K bytes
>in 17 lines about:
>: Nov 05 17:49:03.989 [debug] TLS error: unexpected close while reading
>: Nov 05 17:49:03.989 [info] connection_read_to_buf(): tls er
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:10:25AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.5K bytes in
10 lines about:
: Standard openssl with VIA patches for using VIA Padlock for some
: encryption. See http://www.logix.cz/michal/doc/article.xp/padlock-en
Just for fun, have you tried standard openssl without any VIA p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 05:52:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.6K bytes
> in 17 lines about:
> : Nov 05 17:49:03.989 [debug] TLS error: unexpected close while reading
> : Nov 05 17:49:03.989 [info] connection_read_to_buf(): tls error. breaking
>
> Is your openssl o
On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 05:52:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.6K bytes in
17 lines about:
: Nov 05 17:49:03.989 [debug] TLS error: unexpected close while reading
: Nov 05 17:49:03.989 [info] connection_read_to_buf(): tls error. breaking
Is your openssl old or broken, perhaps? Alternatively
Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
>> Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
>> And yes, HardwareAccel used to be OK and I see no errors logged.
>>
>
> I ran with some more debugging and I see quite a lot of
> 'connection_read_to_buf(): tls error. breaking' lines.
> How can I find out what i
Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> And yes, HardwareAccel used to be OK and I see no errors logged.
>
>
>
I ran with some more debugging and I see quite a lot of
'connection_read_to_buf(): tls error. breaking' lines.
How can I find out what is wrong? (stuff ran OK in the pa
Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Any insights after seeing the graphs?
FWIW, here is my minimal config. Did I do something stupid?
SocksPort 9050 # what port to open for local application connections
SocksListenAddress 127.0.0.1 # accept connections only from localhost
ControlPort 9051
Nickname [withh
Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
> On 11/3/07, Udo van den Heuvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
>>> Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
> no peaks.
> Why is the traffic like it is?
No idea. Did you ever update/restart your Tor-server?
Could you share your MRTG-grahps
On 11/3/07, Udo van den Heuvel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> > Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
> >>> no peaks.
> >>> Why is the traffic like it is?
> >> No idea. Did you ever update/restart your Tor-server?
> >> Could you share your MRTG-grahps with us?
> >
> > http://pindaro
Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
>>> no peaks.
>>> Why is the traffic like it is?
>> No idea. Did you ever update/restart your Tor-server?
>> Could you share your MRTG-grahps with us?
>
> http://pindarots.xs4all.nl/mrtg/tor.html
Any insights after seeing the graphs?
Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
>> no peaks.
>> Why is the traffic like it is?
>
> No idea. Did you ever update/restart your Tor-server?
> Could you share your MRTG-grahps with us?
http://pindarots.xs4all.nl/mrtg/tor.html
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/31/07, Udo van den Heuvel wrote:
> Hello,
Hi!
> In my mrtg graphs I see fair traffic until april, then less traffic
> until august and after august it is 2xx bytes/s in average with almost
> no peaks.
> Why is the traffic like it is?
No idea.
Hello,
In my mrtg graphs I see fair traffic until april, then less traffic
until august and after august it is 2xx bytes/s in average with almost
no peaks.
Why is the traffic like it is?
Udo
16 matches
Mail list logo