Ben Wilhelm schrieb:
> Pick the most common user-agent and use it. That's probably whatever the
> latest version of Firefox returns.
Ok, I use (only a few examples):
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; sk-SK; rv:1.8.1.6)
Gecko/20070824 Firefox/2.0.0.6
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i586; de-DE
TOR Admin (gpfTOR1) wrote:
Robert Hogan schrieb:
Do:
Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?) (browser)
I think, it is nessecary. Do this job in browser, because no proxy can
do it for SSL-encrypted stuff. And change the fake time by time.
I disagree. Don't do an
Robert Hogan schrieb:
> Do:
> Spoof user-agent (is this necessary even with javascript disabled?) (browser)
I think, it is nessecary. Do this job in browser, because no proxy can
do it for SSL-encrypted stuff. And change the fake time by time.
You may try showmyip with and without javascript. In
On Friday 12 October 2007 00:26:46 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:57:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K
bytes in 29 lines about:
> : Keeping track of all the things you should turn off or get a proxy to
> : tweak makes my feeble head hurt.
>
> The latest torbutton-dev
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 08:57:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K bytes in
29 lines about:
: Keeping track of all the things you should turn off or get a proxy to tweak
: makes my feeble head hurt.
The latest torbutton-dev releases handle most of this for you.
--
Andrew
n/953 > to spoof
> > > > referrers headers, not Polipo, as RefControl does HTTPS and HTTP.
> > >
> > > Yep. In all cases, doing things in the browser is better than doing
> > > them in the proxy.
> > >
> > > However, I understand th
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 13:20:31 Pat Double wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > > You should use RefControl <
> > > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/953 > to spoof
> > > referrers headers, not Polip
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 07:32:31AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K
> bytes in 39 lines about:
> : > Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd be glad to link
> : > to it from the Polipo page.
> :
> : If phobos doesn't have a script I'l
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 07:32:31AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K bytes in
39 lines about:
: > Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd be glad to link
: > to it from the Polipo page.
:
: If phobos doesn't have a script I'll most likely write one. Th
m start to end
> > and if something is blacklisted AND whitelisted, it is
> > allowed. AFAIK Polipo only provides a blacklist.
>
> If you provide me with the precise semantics of the whitelist, I can
> implement something compatible in Polipo.
Is this what you're looking for?
http
> If phobos doesn't have a script I'll most likely write one. The
> problem would be that the 'easylist' also includes a whitelist at
> the end, I assume that all patterns are scanned from start to end
> and if something is blacklisted AND whitelisted, it is
> al
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > It's fairly easy to convert the adblock plus 'easylist' into a polipo
> > forbidden file.
>
> Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd be glad to link
> to it from the Polipo pa
On Tuesday 09 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > You should use RefControl <
> > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/953 > to spoof
> > referrers headers, not Polipo, as RefControl does HTTPS and HTTP.
>
> Yep. In all cases, doing things
> It's fairly easy to convert the adblock plus 'easylist' into a polipo
> forbidden file.
Do you have a script you'd be willing to share? I'd be glad to link
to it from the Polipo page.
Juliusz
> You should use RefControl <
> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/953 > to spoof
> referrers headers, not Polipo, as RefControl does HTTPS and HTTP.
Yep. In all cases, doing things in the browser is better than doing
them in the proxy.
However, I understand tha
> What about censoring ETag, Last-Modified and If-Modified-Since ? Those are
> used to send info to the client that will be send back to the server, hence
> something can be encoded there to identify the machine.
Don't censor ETag and Last-Modified under any circumstances. Polip
n/953 > to spoof referrers
headers, not Polipo, as RefControl does HTTPS and HTTP. The nice thing about
RefControl is it can be set to the option which will use the current
site's own root as the referrer. So Incognito would have full (HTTP/S)
referrer spoofing and it should not break a
On Sunday 07 October 2007, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Any suggestion for additional censorings?
Thanks for the info, I'll apply it.
What about censoring ETag, Last-Modified and If-Modified-Since ? Those are
used to send info to the client that will be send back to the server, hence
something c
Hi,
> I am considering changing the Incognito LiveCD to use Polipo.
Excellent news.
> Polipo config -
> https://tor-svn.freehaven.net/svn/incognito/branches/polipo/root_overlay/etc/polipo/
First point -- you'll definitely want to set disableLocalInterface.
Since you're
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:30:09PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K bytes in
32 lines about:
: > I did a search for AdBlock and found AdBlock and AdBlock Plus. Any idea
which
: > to use?
It's fairly easy to convert the adblock plus 'easylist' into a polipo
forbidden file.
--
Andrew
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Pat Double wrote:
> I did a search for AdBlock and found AdBlock and AdBlock Plus. Any idea which
> to use?
my personal taste goes for adblock plus: more colors, nice graphics, the
automagically updated block-lists and the nice "block tab" on top of
f
On Friday 05 October 2007, Andrew Del Vecchio wrote:
> 4: Yes. Also, if possible, have HTTP referers disabled as well.
HTTP referers is being done in
https://tor-svn.freehaven.net/svn/incognito/branches/polipo/root_overlay/etc/polipo/config
I did a search for AdBlock and found AdBlock
iveCD to use Polipo. I
> have a branch with it enabled. Currently it is using a
> squid/privoxy combination. I need to know: 1. An appropriate polipo
> config. 2. Features in privoxy that should be implemented in other
> ways, via extensions, polipo config, etc. 3. I have a short list
&
Incognito is a Live CD aimed towards anonymity. (Links given below).
I am considering changing the Incognito LiveCD to use Polipo. I have a branch
with it enabled. Currently it is using a squid/privoxy combination. I need to
know:
1. An appropriate polipo config.
2. Features in privoxy that
win98 in a vm as well, I could test that as a truly
obsolete OS. Much like Tor, it appears none of the polipo developers
nor testers use Windows as their main OS. Unfortunately, our users
typically use Windows as their main OS. This means we do have to
support and maintain the Windows code and i
[CC-ing or-talk, in case somebody there has already heard about this
Windows thing]
>> 1. I'm seriously thinking about removing the native Windows code,
>> unless I find a maintainer.
> That worries me a bit,
It's not like Polipo development breaks things daily.
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 05:11:57PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.3K bytes
> in 35 lines about:
>
> For Polipo 1.0.3, I'll include a config.tor for the lazy people.
Point taken. Patches welcome.
Juliusz
On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 05:11:57PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.3K bytes in
35 lines about:
For Polipo 1.0.3, I'll include a config.tor for the lazy people.
--
Andrew
Dear all,
In an attempt to reduce the amount of queries I receive by personal
mail, please make a note of the following.
Running Polipo with Tor is described in excruciating detail on
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/polipo/tor.html
The Polipo manual is included in the Polipo
> I put together a standard Polipo 1.0.2 universal binary for OSX users.
> It's located at http://interloper.org/tmp/polipo/.
Excellent.
> The config file has comments for those wishing to use it with Tor.
Could I please see a copy? I'm rather keen on having the defa
On Sun, Aug 26, 2007 at 11:08:50PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 2.2K bytes in
71 lines about:
I put together a standard Polipo 1.0.2 universal binary for OSX users.
It's located at http://interloper.org/tmp/polipo/. The tarball
contains my 'contrib' dir designed to be e
(Andrew -- are you on polipo-users? If so, I suggest we move there,
no need to clutter or-talk.)
> I put up the source from which I built the dmg and universal binary,
Thanks. (For anyone listening and who's not familiar with Apple's
marketing talk, a « Universal binary » is
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 01:16:52AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 1.1K bytes in
38 lines about:
: Could you please explain that? (I'm unfortunately unable to unpack
: your dmg file since I replaced my installation of MacOS 7.1 with
: NetBSD 1.5. So now you know why Polipo contains ``#
> I've built a Polipo-1.0.1 universal binary for OSX 10.4 and above.
Excellent.
Is the async resolver working? I tested it under 10.3 at some point,
but I'd be glad to hear whether I've broken anything since then.
> The config file [...] attempts to make intelligent
On Mon, Jun 25, 2007 at 04:59:50PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.6K bytes in
23 lines about:
I've built a Polipo-1.0.1 universal binary for OSX 10.4 and above. This
Polipo installs to /Library/Polipo, uses a start script in
/Library/StartupItems/Polipo, and places the www, cache, and
A Windows binary for Polipo 1.0.1 is now available on
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/polipo/polipo-win32-1.0.1.zip
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/polipo/polipo-win32-1.0.1.zip.asc
This binary has never seen a Windows machine, so feedback would be
appreciated
Dear all,
I'm pleased to announce the release of Polipo-1.0.1, which you will
find on
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/polipo/polipo-1.0.1.tar.gz
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/polipo/polipo-1.0.1.tar.gz.asc
For more information about Polipo, please see
> I'm actually using polipo and offcourse i'm up for testing it.
Thanks.
> Do you want me to send feedbacks to this email?
Bug reports, feature requests, patches, usage questions and more
generally anything that you feel might interest the other users of
Polipo should go to
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've put an experimental native Windows binary of Polipo in
[..]
> This binary has never seen a real Windows system (I test under Linux
> with a Windows emulator -- sorry, but I don't have a Windows machine),
> and I'd b
Hi all,
I've put an experimental native Windows binary of Polipo in
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/polipo/polipo-20060823.exe
http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/files/polipo/polipo-20060823.exe.asc
This is still very experimental; for serious use, I still recommend
Roger Dingledine:
> Known issues when using Polipo with Tor:
> 1) In the config.sample, it suggests
> socksParentProxy = "localhost:9050"
> You should either change this to 127.0.0.1:9050, or enable the
> dnsUseGethostbyname config option -- otherwise polipo asks
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:02:48AM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
>> > 6) Polipo writes your hostname in every request. Either define proxyName
>> > to something else, or set [d]isableVia = true in your config file.
>> This cannot be stressed enough. Unfortun
On Wed, Aug 23, 2006 at 03:02:48AM +0200, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
> > 6) Polipo writes your hostname in every request. Either define proxyName
> > to something else, or set [d]isableVia = true in your config file.
>
> This cannot be stressed enough. Unfortunately, us
>> > It turns out Privoxy has teh awesoma poweru of being able to have
>> > an HTTP proxy after Tor [...] I was unable to find a way for
>> > Polipo to do this
>> Polipo can do this too. Just set both your parentProxy and your
>> socksParentProxy.
>
Roger Dingledine:
> 1) In the config.sample, it suggests
> socksParentProxy = "localhost:9050"
> You should either change this to 127.0.0.1:9050, or enable the
> dnsUseGethostbyname config option -- otherwise polipo asks your name
> servers where "localhost
ngeLog?revision=1.35
and:
http://www.fabiankeil.de/sourcecode/privoxy/
to see the changes, at least some of them are relevant for Tor users.
> I am thinking Polipo is a nice next option:
> http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/polipo/
> I've been using it the past month or two with
Thus spake Roger Dingledine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 07:49:56PM -0500, Mike Perry wrote:
> > 7) The definition of parent proxy is different between Polipo and
> > Privoxy. It turns out Privoxy has teh awesoma poweru of being able to
> > have an HTTP pro
On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 07:49:56PM -0500, Mike Perry wrote:
> 7) The definition of parent proxy is different between Polipo and
> Privoxy. It turns out Privoxy has teh awesoma poweru of being able to
> have an HTTP proxy after Tor. This is useful for sites that block Tor,
> such
e
> dnsUseGethostbyname config option -- otherwise polipo asks your name
> servers where "localhost" is, with possibly disastrous implications.
>
> 2) Polipo doesn't do as much application-level scrubbing as Privoxy tries
> to do. But Privoxy isn't very good at
he http proxy out of the loop entirely now that
Firefox supports safe socks, but it turns out that the entire networking
component of Firefox blocks during socks handshakes, so that is not an
option until somebody does a major overhaul of Firefox.)
I am thinking Polipo is a nice next option:
h
[I'm forwarding to the list since Juliusz is not subscribed. -RD]
- Forwarded message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
From: Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: How to run tor with Polipo
Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 19:57:35 +0200
--=-=-=
Dear al
101 - 151 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
