Hello,
thanks for all the help!
Tor has no memory leak on my server.
I reduced the band width settings from 200KB/400KB to this:
BandwidthRate 100 KB
BandwidthBurst 200 KB
and Tor uses around 90 MB of memory and is now running
stable since 5 days:
28039 debian-t 16 0 107m 88m 7380 S4
Andrew schrieb:
Dietrich Schmidt schrieb:
| My (rented) server has a guaranteed amount of 128 MB RAM,
| and I am running apache webserver with ssl and php, postfix mail,
| cyrus imaps and ldaps on it
If you're talking about a Strato vServer here, it works just fine up to
a bandwith of approx. 3M
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dietrich Schmidt schrieb:
| My (rented) server has a guaranteed amount of 128 MB RAM,
| and I am running apache webserver with ssl and php, postfix mail,
| cyrus imaps and ldaps on it
If you're talking about a Strato vServer here, it works just fine u
Dietrich Schmidt wrote:
On my internet server, tor has a memory leak.
hi,
There's a problem with memory fragmentation under glibc
malloc().
https://bugs.torproject.org/flyspray/index.php?do=details&id=468&area=comments
The Openbsd malloc() function solved this issue from my
point of view.
Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2008, 16:09 +0100 schrieb Dominik Schaefer:
> Andrew wrote:
> > While I'm not an expert at any of this, I would think that ~100MB might
> > very well be a reasonable size for a somewhat fast tor node. How do these
> > figures compare to others running on Ubuntu?
> My two rela
Andrew on 2008-02-24 15:56:43 +0100:
> While I'm not an expert at any of this, I would think that ~100MB might
> very well be a reasonable size for a somewhat fast tor node.
> How do these figures compare to others running on Ubuntu?
I saw ~100MB RAM usage on a Debian middle node; it starts out s
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 2:56 PM, Andrew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dietrich Schmidt schrieb:
> > I forgot to mention, that my internet server is running
> > as a middle-node.
>
[...]
> While I'm not an expert at any of this, I would think that ~100MB might
> very well be a reasonable size for
Andrew wrote:
While I'm not an expert at any of this, I would think that ~100MB might
very well be a reasonable size for a somewhat fast tor node. How do these
figures compare to others running on Ubuntu?
My two relay nodes on Debian Etch (about 200k and 300k bandwidth) consume
about 200MB (250
Dietrich Schmidt schrieb:
I forgot to mention, that my internet server is running
as a middle-node.
Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2008, 10:34 +0100 schrieb Dietrich Schmidt:
On my internet server, tor has a memory leak.
If I start tor, it requires 10 megabyte:
top - 19:13:12 up 1:24, 2 users, lo
I forgot to mention, that my internet server is running
as a middle-node.
Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2008, 10:34 +0100 schrieb Dietrich Schmidt:
> On my internet server, tor has a memory leak.
> If I start tor, it requires 10 megabyte:
>
> top - 19:13:12 up 1:24, 2 users, load average: 0.07, 0.04,
I've used tor on 6.06 desktop and never experienced this, or at least I've
never had it get to the point where the impact on my machine was noticeable.
Hmm...
Comrade Ringo Kamens
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 4:34 AM, Dietrich Schmidt <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On my internet server, tor has a memo
On my internet server, tor has a memory leak.
If I start tor, it requires 10 megabyte:
top - 19:13:12 up 1:24, 2 users, load average: 0.07, 0.04, 0.00
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND
29872 debian-t 15 0 20784 10m 4372 S1 0.5 0:02.68 tor
After 16 h
12 matches
Mail list logo
