I just subscribed to this list, so if the matters I bring up in this
message have already been discussed and settled, please just let me know
the results.
There are two behaviors of tor running as a server that have been
bothering me. The first is the response to SIGINT w.r.t. the
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 06:50:50AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
I just subscribed to this list, so if the matters I bring up in this
message have already been discussed and settled, please just let me know
the results.
There are two behaviors of tor running as a server that have been
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 09:54:01 -0400 Roger Dingledine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 06:50:50AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
I just subscribed to this list, so if the matters I bring up in this
message have already been discussed and settled, please just let me know
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:33:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 5.7K bytes in
104 lines about:
: I'm sorry, but I cannot agree. How is crashing a running server better
: than somebody missing a message? After all, sending SIGHUP is a manual
It happens far more often than you may
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 18:13:14 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 12:33:04PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 5.7K bytes
in 104 lines about:
: I'm sorry, but I cannot agree. How is crashing a running server better
: than somebody missing a message? After all, sending
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 05:51:14PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
: Do you think that they prefer to have their server crash, rather than
:to issue an error message and continue operations?
Yes. If I restart a service I want to be sure it restarted not have
to go check and see if it really
6 matches
Mail list logo
