AFAIK, TAF does not support Forms.
Refer to Note 114548.1 and 97926.1
(quoting from 114548.1 : "Developer applications do not support TAF as
there is no great advantage in
using it. "
and from 97926.1: "At the time of writing only a limited number of client
environments are 'failover aware'. Th
Larry,
Some time ago Mladen Gogala had posted about a tool (Move For Servers) from
Princeton Softech.
Here is the link :
http://www.princetonsoftech.com/products/moveforservers.asp
We are looking into this product as well.
HTH,
Regards,
- Kirti
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, J
Certainly, much of the 'under the hood' work needed to make the delivered
database simple for end users to manipulate is very complicated. But, Codd
merely postulated standards for the 'ideal' relational database, he didn't
prescribe the means for achieving those standards, or that the standards
I admit to being on shaky ground on rule 11. See my
comments in another post.
You *could* argue that 'instead of' triggers allow compliance
with rule 7. Have you tried to implement it? It gets too complicated
too fast.
This may be a case of being in compliance with the letter of the
law
One could argue that Oracle is compliant with rule 11. A distributed
Oracle database can be constructed in such a way as to be transparent to end
users.
With the addition of 'INSTEAD OF' triggers in 8i, one could argue that
Oracle is also compliant with rule 7.
Just my $.02.
Chuck
- Orig
Why do you feel it fails those two?
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 9:45 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Here's a URL for a list of the rules:
http://luna.pepperdine.edu/~ckettemb/class/Codd12R.html
After taking a quick glance at the rules, I think that
I don't think you can connect 1000 clients on Oracle 8i+ with
8 GB of RAM. I don't know what the memory footprint is on Win2k,
but on unix systems it's not unusual for a dedicated process to
require 8 meg of RAM.
You probably need to do some benchmarking on a Win2k system
to get a good idea of
I've seen some pretty ugly schemas in Oracle, from third
party apps in particular.
It would be most interesting if an automated tool could
subset these.
Jared
On Friday 18 January 2002 23:20, Dale Edgar wrote:
> Hi Jared
>
> Disclaimer: I work for Net 2000 Ltd. the authors of DataBee - a data
11 is rather subjective.
What I had in mind was when using distributed queries the users
always knew it cuz the performance sucked big time. :)
>From a logical perspective, it can be setup so they won't know they
are on a distribute database.
Jared
On Saturday 19 January 2002 05:55, Rachel C
My first question is , I need a database
where 1000 clients will work .Which is better ?
Dedicated Server Mode or Shared Server Mode
?
RAM : 8 GB
CPU : 8 * 1000 MHZ
WIN 2K
My second question is , I can not select more then
600 mb of RAM to be the buffer cache . How can I solve this?
Th
for 11 it depends on how you define user I think. If the DBA has set up
the synonyms, db links etc properly then any OTHER user would not
necesssarily know the database is distributed
--- Jared Still <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Here's a URL for a list of the rules:
>
> http://luna.pepperdine
Title: RE: /*+ NESTED_TABLE_GET_REFS +*/ hint
Thankyou Christian.
rgds
amar
http://amzone.netfirms.com
-Original Message-
From: Christian Trassens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 2:11 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: /*+ NESTED_T
Boo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 6:20 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Test
>
>
> Knock-knock.
>
> Scott Shafer
> San Antonio, TX
> 210-581-6217
>
> "
Knock-knock.
Scott Shafer
San Antonio, TX
210-581-6217
"Common sense will not accomplish great things. Simply become insane and
desperate."
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX
14 matches
Mail list logo
