connect descriptor is more like it, since you may load balance the listener.
what is the different any way with destination address? is this an exam question or
what?
-Original Message-
Sent: 29 June 2003 02:44
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hello list
does a service name be
That is the whole problem, there is no logged errors, or trace files.
Everyone can connect via the MTS servers, no problem, however no one can
connect via dedicated server. Go figure.
Regards
Denham
-Original Message-
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 6:54 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list O
Hi Cary,
Thanks for the mail.
We were thinking that clusters was the next option if this did not make a
difference.
Regards,
Madhavan
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 21:49:39 -0800, "Cary Millsap"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Two features already exist that will preserve table physical order even
> through var
Hi, Gogala:
Thanks very much for your suggestions.
some points:
1.Oracle 9i on linux 2.4 does support 64GB datafile/raw device. Linux 2.4
kernel support 2GB+ files and oracle 9i have 64bit filesystem io support.I
have a rac database on raw with some datafiles 20Gb.
2.Maybe I will choose
Linux file systems usually do not support direct I/O (bypassing the buffer
cache), which means that you're going to have double caching with almost
everything except raw devices. You can have up to 256 raw devices on a Linux
box and if your database is small enough (32-bit system, 2G limit applies
In this given simple situation the best option is B. Besides in OCP test,
they just ask for best option of given options. Sometime in practice all of
them may be wrong but still you have to select 'least' wrong.
While doing ONLINE DBA test due to job search or even in OCP practice test
question
Congrats, Finally you found answer to your question...SPFILE is still not
that much reliable
Regards
Rafiq
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 23:09:22 -0800
Hello List, here is what metalink says
fact: Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition 9.2.0
fact: Recovery Manager (RMAN
I agree that we really can't differentiate between options A, B and D -- they
are all Incomplete Database Recoveries. However, option C IS different.
Since we are much more likely to know the "wall clock time" as to when the
table was dropped than the SCN, B makes more sense than A. B also makes
Hi, friends that run oracle on linux:
We are running some database on linux, some with UPS protection and some
not, all using ext2. Currently we have a DW server running oracle 817/Redhat
7.2/Ext2. When server crash because of power supply, fsck took rather long
time!
And we are planning mi
Silly me! With a bunch of years of production DBA experience encountering
problems exactly like this one (except it was someone else dropping the
important table) as well as problems far more complicated, I can't decide
what answer they are seeking here! What's more, I would have chosen the
wrong
No, TSPITR should not be the preferred method. Why not ? Because it
doesn't guarantee that you have achieved consistency of data across objects.
You must still export the "related objects" and bring them in.
Suppose you have a transactions which updates tables in three different
tablespaces. A TS
Hello List, here is what metalink says
fact: Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition 9.2.0
fact: Recovery Manager (RMAN)
symptom: Backupsets are incorrectly reported as obsolete
cause:
"RMAN thinks backups with SPFILE are OBSOLETE"
fix:
Ver. 9.2.0 is the first version that
Hello list , I am planning to appear for my Oracle 9i database
fundamentals II exam ( 1z0-032 ) on the 7th .
I would be grateful for any advice , pointers ,etc. Bit nervous cause
it looks tougher than 1z0-031 ( dba fundamentals 1 )
thanks
...
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://w
13 matches
Mail list logo
