string 8.1.7
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_max_permutations integer 8
optimizer_mode string CHOOSE
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Turner, Adrian
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_max_permutations integer 8
optimizer_mode string CHOOSE
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Turner, Adrian A SITI-ITPSIE
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858
optimizer_max_permutations integer 8
optimizer_mode string CHOOSE
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Turner, Adrian A SITI-ITPSIE
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Turner, Adrian A SITI-ITPSIE
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
.
-Original Message-
From: Turner, Adrian A SITI-ITPSIE
Sent: 16 September 2003 15:16
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Nosort parallel dml uses TEMP tablespace
Apologies if this has been covered before but metalink is not clear on the reasons behind it
The database
required does not compute either.
BTW there are 27 partitions in the target table, which does not match the number
parallel slaves
Cheers,
Adrian
-Original Message-
Sent: 17 September 2003 09:26
To: Turner, Adrian A SITI-ITPSIE
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L
From:
Turner, Adrian A SITI-ITPSIE
To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003
11:39 AM
Subject: RE: Nosort parallel dml uses
TEMP tablespace
I'm even more confused now.
TEMP ran out of spa
Title: Nosort parallel dml uses TEMP tablespace
Apologies if this has been covered before but metalink is not clear on the reasons behind it
The database is running version 9204 EE on WinNT Sp6; and the statement is a parallel direct load into partitioned table selecting from a 12.2GB
see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Turner, Adrian A SITI-ITPSIE
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Turner, Adrian A SITI-ITPSIE
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Turner, Adrian A SITI-ITPSIE
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California-- Mailing list and web hosting services
-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Turner, Adrian A SITI-ITPSIE
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services
Title: Message
Ramon,
Our Win2k boxes get between 1000-2000 gets a
second off a SAN.
Are you using
compressed folders to store your datafiles?
Whats
Multi_block_read_countset to?
Set MBRC to 32 (32x8K=256K). Make
your extent sizesare divisable by
256Kto reduce
gets
Regards
Adrian
13 matches
Mail list logo