RE: All packages under sys is invalid

2004-01-21 Thread nelson . petersen
Is sombebody playing with Statspack (spcreate.sql)? One piece of the install runs dbmspool.sql Nelson -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 3:59 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L So what's the recommendation, how can I recompile all the SYS packages? -Origina

RE: how do I interpret this in bstat/estat

2004-01-21 Thread nelson . petersen
Gene, I strongly recommend implementing Statspack. It is very straight-forward. Just do it when you have exclusive use of the database, or comment out the following two lines in ora_rdbms_admin:SPCUSR.SQL if you have these packages already installed. (We're running 8.1.7 on VMS.

RE: table reorganizations - simple/complex

2004-01-08 Thread nelson . petersen
d nail it. Everyone who is willing to put in some sweat equity can use Method-R. I'm not sure how a badly fragmented table would show up in a 10046 trace file. If a table reorganization is really required, I think a trace would show excess physical io. Nelson Petersen -- Please see the

RE: Little competition

2003-12-11 Thread nelson . petersen
What's wrong with the analysis?   Wrong syntax in the 'CREATE TABLE'   PCTFREE and PCTUSED are not part of the storage clause.   SQL> create table t1 (c1 number) tablespace lmt1 pctfree 20 pctused 30;   Table created.   Lot's of potential to go down the wrong path on this one. Assumptions!

RE: Windows clustering???

2003-12-10 Thread nelson . petersen
Now you've got me going, Rich. After 15 years of VMS we're being forced to use UNIX (HP-UX 11i) just because the application we want to use doesn't run on VMS. (Developers needed to re-write the app for VMS. Marketing needed so the developers will be paid and the company will be profitable.)

RE: Analytic bug in 9.2.0.4

2003-12-05 Thread nelson . petersen
The same thing occurs on OpenVMS on version 9.2.0.4 of Oracle.   Nelson -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:29 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Analytic bug in 9.2.0.4While playing around wi

RE: decrease initial extent

2003-12-03 Thread nelson . petersen
Title: RE: decrease initial extent Since I agreed with Mladen that it wouldn't work, I just had to test this.   On 8.1.7.3 on OpenVMS the "deallocate unused keep # " shrinks the initial extent. It shrank a test table from  1m to 8k.  I'm not sure why it chose 8k. (db_block_size=4k, defaul