Named users! - final clarification

2002-10-22 Thread O'Neill, Sean
Thanks folks for your replies on my initial query. Just to clarify by example, how many named user licences would I need for a database with following users. Forgetting minimum purchase requirements I suspect it's 3 is this correct? USERNAME -- SYS SYSTEM OUTLN

Re: Named users! - final clarification

2002-10-22 Thread Ron Rogers
The last quote I received had a minimum of 10 named users. Ron ROr mª¿ªm [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/22/02 07:58AM Thanks folks for your replies on my initial query. Just to clarify by example, how many named user licences would I need for a database with following users. Forgetting minimum purchase

RE: Named users! - final clarification

2002-10-22 Thread Edward Shevtsov
AFAIK minimum of 25 for EE since september Regards, Ed -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:root;fatcity.com] On Behalf Of Ron Rogers Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2002 4:34 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Named users! - final clarification

Re: Named users! - final clarification

2002-10-22 Thread Rick_Cale
ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] tery.orgcc: Sent by: Subject: Re: Named users! - final clarification [EMAIL

Re: Named users! - final clarification

2002-10-22 Thread Yechiel Adar
I think that you got the concept wrong. Named users are NOT the userids define in the database. Named users are flesh and blood people that are using applications that access the database. So, if you have an application that use userid GATESB to access the database and you have Bill, Jones and