Yes .. that is good.
GovindanK
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 13:44:34 -0800, "Freeman Robert - IL"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Excellent slide show Tanel!
>
> Robert
>
> -Original Message-
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Sent: 12/10/2003 3:34 PM
> dc_histogram_defs)
>
> > Pete, I'd
I concur.
Yechiel Adar
Mehish
- Original Message -
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:44 PM
> Excellent slide show Tanel!
>
> Robert
>
> -Original Message-
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Sent: 12/1
Yep, sqlplus.exe will still be there. Otherwise one wouln't be able to run
any automated sql scripts, because isqlplus can't do it as far as I
understand.
Tanel.
- Original Message -
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 12:04 AM
Robert, Robert, Robert, when will you ever learn? You've been listening
to the marketing people again. :)
The whole goal behind this part of the release is not to make the
database look easy to manage (which is good because I've never thought
it WAS difficult to manage!) It's for those lower en
>> Doesn't matter if there's 30 or 300, you don't usually mess with
>> them other than at database create time.
Shh Oracle thinks this is a marketing coup They want to make the
database look easy to manage...
"Parameters? Ha, you only need configure a few basic parameters and the
d
Tanel,
Whthough they may not have the sqlplusw.exe for windoes is the sqlplus.exe
still there?
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 4:45 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
d
Excellent slide show Ta
Excellent slide show Tanel!
Robert
-Original Message-
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: 12/10/2003 3:34 PM
dc_histogram_defs)
> Pete, I'd like to clarify my position first: I don't have any burning
problem
> that would compel me to start testing 10g. I want only to learn the
