AW: JDBC and MTS

2003-06-17 Thread Stefan Jahnke
Hi Mladen We started evaluating MTS and JDBC Thin Driver (newest version for JDK 1.4, running on Win2k against a test db on win2k, test db is oracle 9.2.0.3.0). I never used SRVR=DEDICATED. I have a dispatcher running on port 5000 and a listener on port 1521. The only thing I do to direct the

AW: JDBC and MTS

2003-06-17 Thread Stefan Jahnke
Hi Regis That's basically right. As I just posted, we use MTS for development, so that not every developer starts up a local connection pool on their workstation and we also don't end up with too many dedicated server processes. But I think you're right saying that MTS and application side

AW: JDBC

2002-07-08 Thread Stefan Jahnke
Hi Antje Eventhough I never migrated Sybase (or SQL Server) code (JDBC/Java) to Oracle, maybe that helps anyway: In Transact SQL, you can actually return data from an anonymous block, that's correct. An equivalent to do this in PL/SQL might be the use of OUT parameters within stored

AW: JDBC

2002-07-08 Thread Stefan Jahnke
Hi Richard You can do that. But I think it is recommandable to wrap up the PL/SQL and put it into packages. This way, your code is much better organized than having anonymous blocks throughout your Java code. Regards, Stefan Jahnke Consultant BOV Aktiengesellschaft Voice: +49 201 - 4513-298