recipients
of
list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bunyamink@havels cc:
an.com.tr Subject: closing DB on
NT
with a scheduled BATCH FILE
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/08
thing is you do not understand the problem perhaps.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:33
PM
Subject: RE: closing DB on NT with a
scheduled BATCH FILE
silly question.
Are
you
the
problem perhaps.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject: RE: closing DB on NT with a scheduled BATCH FILE
silly question.
Are you sure your batch file runs? Do you create
the
problem perhaps.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject: RE: closing DB on NT with a scheduled BATCH FILE
silly question.
Are you sure your batch file runs? Do you create logs
recipients of
list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bunyamink@havels cc:
an.com.tr Subject: closing DB on NT
with a scheduled BATCH FILE
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/08/01 06:15 AM
To: Multiple recipients
of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bunyamink@havels cc:
an.com.tr Subject: closing DB on
NT with a scheduled BATCH FILE
Sent by:
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Thursday 09 August 2001 01:30, Rajesh Dayal wrote:
Jared,
Just out of curiosity I am asking ( May be I am
missing something)
How does it matter whether the command file is on
C drive or D/E (other) drives?
I'm not an expert on NT, but experience and RTFM show that
your AT
perhaps.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001 8:33 PM
Subject: RE: closing DB on NT with a scheduled
BATCH FILE
silly question.
Are you sure your batch file runs? Do you create
All my batch files are in drive D and I haven't had any problems. Your
problem could have been caused by something else but you can definitely put
your batch files anywhere. I can also run AT from any drive.
George
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:55 AM
To:
Dear Gurus , I have a question , In fact I wonder
if it is a bug of NT .
I want to close and reopen database with a .BAT
file .
When I executethe .bat file directly
it executes correctly . But When I execute it with a schedule with AT command
then it connects but does not close database.
As spoken by the all-great Mladen, "convert to
unix"
joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/08/01 09:15AM
Dear Gurus , I have a question , In fact I wonder
if it is a bug of NT .
I want to close and reopen database with a .BAT
file .
When I executethe .bat file directly it
executes correctly . But
in metalink on doing a cold backup on NT.
Randy
-Original Message-From: JOE TESTA
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001
10:21 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
Re: closing DB on NT with a scheduled BATCH FILE
As spoken by the all-great Mladen
I use the task shcedular
without any problems.
KK
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steiner, RandySent:
Wednesday, August 08, 2001 11:46 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-LSubject: RE: closing DB on NT with a scheduled
PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2001
9:15 AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
closing DB on NT with a scheduled BATCH FILE
Dear Gurus , I have a question , In fact I wonder
if it is a bug of NT .
I want to close and reopen database with a .BAT
file .
When I
@havels cc:
an.com.tr Subject: closing DB on NT with a
scheduled BATCH FILE
Sent
Hi,
I' hav to build up foolowing matrix
DB Size ..
Operating system
NT
Sun Solaris
AIX
...
Has anyone a similar matrix to share?
Especially I'm interested in the size for NT.
I know there was a saying - put no database larger than 1 GB on a NT
machine.
Is this still
Hi,
Regarding the issue of databases larger than 1GB on NT, could someone please
explain this to me, as I was not aware of this 'saying'.
Thanks in advance,
Steven H.
-Original Message-
Antje
Sent: 05 July 2001 10:51
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Hi,
I' hav to build up
Me neither. I've had database 50-70G in size on NT. (Which, in the grand
scale of things isn't terribly large, but it's my personal experience
and sufficient for this example). Compaq ProLiant servers, Compaq RAID
controllers and storage arrays. Very nice equipment, rock solid and very
fast. So
Antje
I know there was a saying - put no database larger than 1 GB on a NT
machine.
The above is nonsense. I have a database that is 200G on NT. I know of no
limit regarding database size on NT.
Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, July
Guy,
rantDon't even get me started on
Unix, which sucks. Rebooting if you need more file descriptors?! Or
shared memory? All operating systems suck. Apart from maybe VMS./rant
Isn't saying all operating systems suck a bit harsh? :) Personally, I
think they all have their challenges, but they
Perhaps it is confusion with filesize and then it is a whole different ball
game and not only for NT but some older unixes and other OS's as well. and
then we can start the arguments for using raw or not using raw for files
under unix.
Peter
At 10:45 PM 5/07/2001, you wrote:
Antje
I know
ALso, what does 1GB actually mean? That much data, if you dumped it
all out into a CSV file? A 1GB tablespace to hold all the data (and how
is that tablespace organized)? 1GB being the sum of the sizes of all the
datafiles? So, even if there were such a saying, it would be
meaningless.
What I
I tend to leave out the sid in a datafile name, saves me from
having to rename it, if i'm doing the transportable tablespace
ordeal.
joe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/05/01 12:03PM
ALso, what does "1GB" actually mean? That much data, if you
dumped itall out into a CSV file? A 1GB tablespace to
Michael,
Thanks. I hadn't noticed that they changed Metalink so that you click on a different
area to get the newest patches.
Saul Solomon
PPG Industries
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 2:43 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Try patch
Sean,
As Paul already mentioned 30 seconds is probably not
long enough, but even so you're probably hitting bug
1336566.
As for the specific versions:
7.3.3.0.0
7.x will never shut down cleanly when stopping the
services or the server as the registry entries
controlling this weren't
Paul Drake wrote:
Please patch 8.1.7.0.0 to at least 8.1.7.0.2, I've been using 8.1.7.1.2
for 6 weeks.
Thanx for the patch info Paul.
Debbie wrote:
It is really hit and miss with Oracle on NT. I have all servers set up
the same (including the registry settings) and some will shutdown the
Paul,
But where is this patchset. It's not on Metalink or the ftp sites.
Saul Solomon
PPG Industries
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 10:06 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
O'Neill, Sean wrote:
I'm trying to configure systems to
Try patch 1711240 for getting from 8.1.7.0 to 8.1.7.1 and then patch 1797438 to get
from
8.1.7.1 to 8.1.7.1.3. I know I found them on MetaLink, so if I recall the navigation
I'll
let you know.
HTH,
Mike
Solomon, Saul M. wrote:
Paul,
But where is this patchset. It's not on Metalink or the
I'm trying to configure systems to shutdown immediate Oracle when NT server
is shutdown. I've followed instructions in Admin manual for registry
settings and being trying it on Oracle PE 8.1.7.0.0 but it don't appear to
work. Oracle does crash recovery when PC [NT4-SP6a] is bounced. Current
Sean,
It is really hit and miss with Oracle on NT. I have all servers set up
the same (including the registry settings) and some will shutdown the
database properly others don't. I have bugged Oracle for an answer but they
always say that the best thing to do is for you to shut down the
O'Neill, Sean wrote:
I'm trying to configure systems to shutdown immediate Oracle when NT server
is shutdown. I've followed instructions in Admin manual for registry
settings and being trying it on Oracle PE 8.1.7.0.0 but it don't appear to
work. Oracle does crash recovery when PC
Sean,
Added to Paul's good list of registry values.
I have used svrmgrl to do a shutdown immediate and then a startup and still
seen recovery in the alert log.
That is, to me, the presence of Beginning crash recovery in the alert log
does not imply the shutdown was not an immediate one.
I would
32 matches
Mail list logo
