Re:RE: RE: Network Appliance

LE-L I've been asked to review Power Point marketing presentation and a "white paper" both publishd by Network Appliance. I'd like to hear off list from anyone who has had some hands on experience with this technology. TIA & HAND! -- Charlie Mengler

RE: RE: Network Appliance

ssage- Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:30 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L I've been asked to review Power Point marketing presentation and a "white paper" both publishd by Network Appliance. I'd like to hear off list from anyone who has had some hands on experi

RE: Network Appliance

58-6394 -Original Message- Sent: Monday, October 29, 2001 7:30 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L I've been asked to review Power Point marketing presentation and a "white paper" both publishd by Network Appliance. I'd like to hear off list from anyone who

Re:RE: Network Appliance

asked to review Power Point marketing presentation and a "white paper" both publishd by Network Appliance. I'd like to hear off list from anyone who has had some hands on experience with this technology. TIA & HAND! -- Charlie Mengler Maintenance Wareho

RE: Network Appliance

hite paper" both publishd by Network Appliance. I'd like to hear off list from anyone who has had some hands on experience with this technology. TIA & HAND! -- Charlie Mengler Maintenance Warehouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]10641 Scripps

RE: Network Appliance

29, 2001 7:30 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L I've been asked to review Power Point marketing presentation and a "white paper" both publishd by Network Appliance. I'd like to hear off list from anyone who has had some hands on experience with this techn

Network Appliance

I've been asked to review Power Point marketing presentation and a "white paper" both publishd by Network Appliance. I'd like to hear off list from anyone who has had some hands on experience with this technology. TIA & HAND! -- Charlie Mengler

Re: Network Appliance Options

, the administration of the netapp filer was very easy to understand and perform. Regards, Satar --- Kathy Duret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anyone used Network Appliance? > > Any options good/bad appreciated as it applies to > Unix (Solaris and HP) and Oracle 8.1.6 and a

Re[2]: Network Appliance Options

That's why you use multiple connections (switched or direct with crossover cables) and balance them. That way you change your mount points to isolate certain types of traffic or limit saturation. We have 3 mount points for a NetApp, each on a different 100BaseT named like /mnt_n1e0, /mnt_n1e1, et

Re: Network Appliance Options

Kathy, Monday, September 24, 2001, 5:07:28 PM, you wrote: K> Has anyone used Network Appliance? K> Any options good/bad appreciated as it applies to Unix (Solaris and K> HP) and Oracle 8.1.6 and above. K> Going to a dog and pony show by them tomorrow. Our databases are running o

Re: Network Appliance Options

>From what I've read on the sun-managers list, Oracle on Netapp is just a dog (no pony for you!). George - Original Message - To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 6:07 PM > Has anyone used Network

RE: Network Appliance Options

ients of list ORACLE-L Has anyone used Network Appliance? Any options good/bad appreciated as it applies to Unix (Solaris and HP) and Oracle 8.1.6 and above. Going to a dog and pony show by them tomorrow. Kathy Confidential This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of Belk

Network Appliance Options

Has anyone used Network Appliance? Any options good/bad appreciated as it applies to Unix (Solaris and HP) and Oracle 8.1.6 and above. Going to a dog and pony show by them tomorrow. Kathy Confidential This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are the property of Belkin Components and

RE: Oracle Performance on Network Appliance

Storage Compatibility Program. (See http://otn.oracle.com/deploy/availability/htdocs/oscp_papers.html#Oracle_OSC P) Network Appliance has received Oracle's blessing but I'm wondering... When properly configured, HOW DOES IT PERFORM? Especially when compared to other solutions such as

Oracle Performance on Network Appliance

It seems Oracle Corp has been putting more resources into improving 3rd party storage solutions, e.g. the OSCP, Oracle Storage Compatibility Program. (See http://otn.oracle.com/deploy/availability/htdocs/oscp_papers.html#Oracle_OSC P) Network Appliance has received Oracle's blessing bu

Re: Anybody using Network Appliance Storage boxes with Oracle?

We're going through a "certification" process, so to speak (offline if you're curious), w/NetApp right now. My testing against a 100 million row (+) table is thus far positive, but testing is really in it's infancy. A few comments: - we're using tcp, not upd (reasons should be obvious) - Gigabi

RE: Anybody using Network Appliance Storage boxes with Oracle?

We use NetApp for our NFS file servers and they are very fast and reliable. The NetApp sales 'droid also tried to sell us their Oracle solution, as they are one of the few vendors that is certified by Oracle to run the RDBMS over NFS. EMC is also certified by Oracle to run on NFS (or so they told

RE: Anybody using Network Appliance Storage boxes with Oracle?

When I spoke to some technical Netapp people on their stand at the UKOUG in December 2000 they explained that they are able to gain Oracle certification by the way their filers do 'a write confirmation over NFS' (as you put it), which regular nfs does not do. I know a site that uses two full hei

RE: Anybody using Network Appliance Storage boxes with Oracle?

I'll try and share some of what I've been told by the NetApp reps. This info is a year old. The NetApp box itself is a very trimmed down version of BSD that handles only the networking and disk i/o stuff. Specifically compiled to work with their controllers. It talks to both NFS and NT nativel