OCOPY

2002-01-30 Thread Keith Worley
Does the database need to be running in archive log mode in order to use OCOPY? Thanks; Keith Worley Confidentiality Disclaimer This email and any files transmitted with it may contain confidential and /or proprietary information in the possession of WellStar Health System, Inc

Re: OCOPY

2002-01-30 Thread DBarbour
Keith.Worley@wel To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] lstar.org cc: Sent by:Subject: OCOPY

RE: OCOPY

2002-01-30 Thread Sujatha Madan
Ocopy is used for hot backups - to copy the datafile etc manually. When you do hotbackups you have to run in archive log mode. -Original Message- Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2002 10:16 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Does the database need to be running in archive log mode

FW: OCOPY

2002-01-30 Thread Sujatha Madan
Ocopy is used for hot backups - to copy the datafile etc manually. When you do hotbackups you have to run in archive log mode. -Original Message- Sent: Thursday, 31 January 2002 10:16 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Does the database need to be running in archive log

RE: OCOPY

2002-01-30 Thread Deshpande, Kirti
Not really.. However, if it is not in archive log mode, and files are copied using OCOPY, those files are basically of no use. You can not recover the database using those files. HTH. - Kirti -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:16 PM To: Multiple recipients of list

Re: OCOPY

2002-01-30 Thread Rajesh . Rao
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: OCOPY

RE: OCOPY

2002-01-30 Thread Thomas B. Cox
Not exactly -- if the database is in NOARCHIVELOG mode, but is shut down, and you do a cold backup with OCOPY, you're fine. However, *any* kind of hot backup attempted in NOARCHIVELOG mode is pretty much useless. Which is doubtless what Kirti was saying. -Tom --- Deshpande, Kirti [EMAIL

RE: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT

2002-01-28 Thread
PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon, January 28, 2002 6:35 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT Your point is (I believe) that the Oracle data files are opened writeable by Oracle at instance startup time. When you use the NT command COPY it will prevent additional

RE: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT

2002-01-28 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
. There are no writes to the tablespace in this situation. Yechiel Adar, Mehish Computer Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Thomas B. Cox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon, January 28, 2002 6:35 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT

Re: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT

2002-01-28 Thread Jared Still
to the tablespace in this situation. Yechiel Adar, Mehish Computer Services [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Thomas B. Cox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon, January 28, 2002 6:35 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject:COPY vs. OCOPY on NT

RE: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT

2002-01-28 Thread Rachel Carmichael
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon, January 28, 2002 6:35 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject:COPY vs. OCOPY on NT Your point is (I believe) that the Oracle data files are opened writeable by Oracle at instance startup time. When you use the NT command

RE: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT

2002-01-28 Thread Grabowy, Chris
. OCOPY on NT Your point is (I believe) that the Oracle data files are opened writeable by Oracle at instance startup time. When you use the NT command COPY it will prevent additional writers, but not those writers that are already holding write locks. My comments and questions are: 1

RE: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT

2002-01-28 Thread Deshpande, Kirti
: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT Your point is (I believe) that the Oracle data files are opened writeable by Oracle at instance startup time. When you use the NT command COPY it will prevent additional writers, but not those writers that are already holding write locks. My comments

RE: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT

2002-01-28 Thread
] -Original Message- From: Jared Still [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon, January 28, 2002 3:41 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT Oh boy, not that old chestnut again. You better take a close look at the concepts manual

RE: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT

2002-01-28 Thread Hallas John
Title: RE: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT Try http://www.speakeasy.org/~jwilton/oracle/hot-backup.html for a view on this John -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 January 2002 09:20 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: COPY vs

RE: COPY vs. OCOPY on NT

2002-01-28 Thread SARKAR, Samir
] -Original Message- From: Thomas B. Cox [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Mon, January 28, 2002 6:35 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject:COPY vs. OCOPY on NT Your point is (I believe) that the Oracle data files are opened writeable by Oracle

COPY vs. OCOPY on NT

2002-01-27 Thread Thomas B. Cox
questions about my experience recovering from online backup and why I don't like MetaLink Note explanation in regard to advantages of Ocopy versus Copy: quote Couple years ago, when we were preparing first release of our product, I read of course about NT Copy versus Oracle Ocopy. Still I