2 default tablespace ts1
> > 3 temporary tablespace TEMP;
> > User created.
> >
> > SQL> grant connect to "GALAXY\USER1";
> > Grant succeeded.
> >
> > When I connect try using sqlplus /@sn1 it fails
> > C:\>sqlplus /@sn1
> > SQL
gt; >
> > SQL> grant connect to "GALAXY\USER1";
> > Grant succeeded.
> >
> > When I connect try using sqlplus /@sn1 it fails
> > C:\>sqlplus /@sn1
> > SQL*Plus: Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production on Tue Dec 30 15:49:56 2003
> > (c)
ed.
>
> When I connect try using sqlplus /@sn1 it fails
> C:\>sqlplus /@sn1
> SQL*Plus: Release 8.1.7.0.0 - Production on Tue Dec 30 15:49:56 2003
> (c) Copyright 2000 Oracle GALAXYoration. All rights reserved.
> ERROR:
> ORA-01017: invalid username/password; logon denied
&
gon denied
What I think issue here is, the connection is thru tns-listener and the NT domain and
the server machine are different.
Is there any solution for this / Is it possible to connect the remote unix DB server
with OS authentication from an NT client with domain name ?
Thanks and Regareds
B S Pradhan
Any one see this one? I am working on getting more info about the
configuration of this database, I don't have access to it. On AIX and
Solaris, it is working fine.
(9.2.0.4.0) on HP-UX. While I am trying to connect to the database using OS
Authentication, the following error is r
Yes, it's
exec dbms_java.set_output(2000);
Richard Ji
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:50 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I'm working from memory here, but there is a procedure in a built-in package, I think
it is DBMS_JAVA, that redirects standard outp
ummm ... something like
system('`my_code`'); --- check there are backticks ...
Not sure if it will run, but hey ...
Raj
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com
All Views expressed in this email are strictly pe
I'm working from memory here, but there is a procedure in a built-in package, I think
it is DBMS_JAVA, that redirects standard output from a Java Stored Procedure to the
same buffer that DBMS_OUTPUT uses. You call this procedure, then your Java method,
and then you can SET SERVEROUTPUT ON to se
Im playing with the example in tom kytes book. we have alot of korn shell scripts that
we use as functions.
We 'echo' out values to standard out. is there anyway to catch this echo with a java
stored procedure? I thought about redirecting it to a file and reading it in with
utl_file, but that
Man...
it's just a bit difficult to find that you want only
in Oracle...
but can try this:
1.- There is an utility on Windows 2000 Resource Kit
called: gettype.exe, it can help you to determine your
OS Type (it works with the errorlevel), you need to be
logged in your domain to make this
Dear List,
We have TXN processing system with as many as 900 users log
in at any point of time. We have the necessity to find what OS type the client
is using (Windows 95, NT 2000 etc). I tried thru V$SESSION,
V$SESSION_CONNECT_INFO and V$PROCESS, but couldn't find any useful in
Title: RE: java package to run OS command
Take a look at metalink doc 222079.1
-Original Message-
From: John Dunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:49 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: java package to run OS command
I need a java
Our Unix guys create 'safe' versions of normal utilities and installed them in a
special folder. So, we use the full path to invoke them from *that* folder. Some
commands get logged to audit files. I'd say, yeah, specify full path, you don't loose
much (well some electrons, but who cares).
Raj
ons in the
wrong hands. But don't blame the toolmaker.
John, the reason that running an OS command is such a hassle is that it can
be horribly destructive to your server. An OS command that runs from a Java
Stored Procedure such as the one from www.oracle-base.com that I gave you or
the one
Message -
From:
Janardhana Babu
Donga
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:44
PM
Subject: How to Find Client OS type from
Oracle 8174..
Dear List,
We have TXN processing system with
as many as 900 users log in
Dear List,
We have TXN processing system with as many as 900 users log
in at any point of time. We have the necessity to find what OS type the client
is using (Windows 95, NT 2000 etc). I tried thru V$SESSION, V$SESSION_CONNECT_INFO
and V$PROCESS, but couldn't find any useful in
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art !
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Dick, harsh words, hmmm? Powerful tools can also be powerful weapons in the wrong
hands. But don't blame the toolmaker.
Mladen Gogala scribbled on the wall in glitter crayon:
> That wouldn't do much harm since it's relatively static and probably
> frequently backed up. Restoring $ORACLE_HOME would be an easy
> excercise. Now passing datafiles or copying /etc/motd onto
> /oradata/SID/system01.dbf would cause much m
By default, no user accounts in the Oracle DB have any privs to do anything
to the OS. Privs -- including privs to execute, read, and write OS files --
must explicitly be granted (and rightly so!).
Do not grant the JAVASYSPRIV or JAVAUSERPRIV to the schema that will own the
ExecOS Java code, as
Bingo! Right on the money.
1) Limit java.fileio.FilePermission("execute") to a single non-system
directory.
2) Control the contents of that directory. This *should* be easy -- make
oracle the owner and set security on it to 700.
Now where's the hassle in that? :)
Rich
Rich Jesse
ving an opinion is an art !
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 1:29 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Dick, harsh words, hmmm? Powerful tools can also be powerful weapons in the wrong
hands. But don't blame the toolmaker.
John, the reason that running an
Dick, harsh words, hmmm? Powerful tools can also be powerful weapons in the wrong
hands. But don't blame the toolmaker.
John, the reason that running an OS command is such a hassle is that it can be
horribly destructive to your server. An OS command that runs from a Java Stored
Proc
ecipients of list ORACLE-L
>
>
> yeah, I'm trying to get away from C external procedures ...but java is
> beginning to look just as much a hassle.
>
> Why is running a OS command such hassle?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> Sent: 04 December 2003 15:40
>
e and
maintain. This prevents someone from executing something like the
following:
#!/bin/sh
$ORATEMP=/my/oracle/bome/temp
/usr/bin/rm -rf $ORATMEP/*
We also restrict read/write to /tmp, which works for how we use OS
interaction.
My $.02,
Rich
Rich Jesse System/Dat
DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
yeah, I'm trying to get away from C external procedures ...but java is
beginning to look just as much a hassle.
Why is running a OS comm
QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having an opinion is an art !
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 12:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
yeah, I'm trying to get away from C external procedures ...but java is
beginning to look just as much a has
yeah, I'm trying to get away from C external procedures ...but java is
beginning to look just as much a hassle.
Why is running a OS command such hassle?
-Original Message-
Sent: 04 December 2003 15:40
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Here's another link to a good J
ts of list ORACLE-L
its in tom kytes first book. might be on his webpage.
>
> From: John Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/12/04 Thu AM 08:49:25 EST
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: java package to run OS command
>
> I ne
L
I need a java package that will allow me to run OS commands(Unix) from a
stored procedure.
Anyone got one?
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: John Dunn
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San
nts of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: java package to run OS command
>
> I need a java package that will allow me to run OS commands(Unix) from a
> stored procedure.
>
> Anyone got one?
>
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www
recipients of list ORACLE-L
its in tom kytes first book. might be on his webpage.
>
> From: John Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/12/04 Thu AM 08:49:25 EST
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: java package to run OS command
>
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: java package to run OS command
>
> I need a java package that will allow me to run OS commands(Unix) from a
> stored procedure.
>
> Anyone got one?
>
>
> --
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
> --
>
expert one on one. check asktom.oracle.com might be on there also.
>
> From: John Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/12/04 Thu AM 09:44:29 EST
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: java package to run OS comm
John,
Try this:
Process p = Runtime.getRuntime().exec("/usr/bin/df -Pk");
Abraham
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 7:49 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I need a java package that will allow me to run OS commands(Unix) from a
stored procedur
its in tom kytes first book. might be on his webpage.
>
> From: John Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2003/12/04 Thu AM 08:49:25 EST
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: java package to run OS command
>
> I need a java pac
I need a java package that will allow me to run OS commands(Unix) from a
stored procedure.
Anyone got one?
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: John Dunn
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San
Thanks to all that replied.
Fortunately, I have a good backup of the corrupted partition.
Unfortunately, estimated recovery time will be 4 days.
-Original Message-
DENNIS WILLIAMS
Sent: Saturday, 29 November 2003 7:54 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sujatha - If it helps,
Sujatha - If it helps, we have Tru64 and 8.1.6 here. My sys admin has
defragged the disk quite a few times with no apparent ill effects.
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, November 27, 2003 7:59 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list OR
tus.net.au> cc:
Sent by: Subject: OS Level Defrag
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Title: Re: OS Level Defrag
Ask him/her to demonstrate their point empirically and not speculate or cite hearsay. After all, they should not have any difficulty putting together a simple test case and then demonstrating how “de-fragmentation” aids performance.
Databases simply do not
Title: Message
Hi,
Does anyone here
do an O/S level defrag of their Oracle filesystems???
Background:
(Tru64/8.1.7.4)
Sysadmin here were
adamant that the Oracle domains were running out of extents and were highly
fragmented (O/S level). DBA was adamant that the Oracle filesystems shoul
Hi
This would be a security risk to have a java callout that can execute
any OS command with group ID DBA, this means it could for instance..
call sqlplus -s and execute a script that changes the SYS
passwordedit the password file and change the password hashes to
known values...why not just
9/05/2003 01:29 PM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: external procedure as not-oracle on OS
In order to run some OS commands from within the database we have set up a
few
you can do this all easily with a java stored procedure. alot less code. also, it will
run as the DBA group on unix.
there is an example in tom kytes book. Really short code. You can call any OS script
with it. Might be on his website too.
you then create a chmod script in unix that oracle
In order to run some OS commands from within the database we have set up a
few external procedures. One of the functions we need to accomplish is to
change the permissions of a file owned by a user other than oracle. As the
external procedure is executed by Oracle, this is a problem. I tried
Hi All,
Current Environment: Oracle Apps 11.0.3, OS Windows NT 4
Since Windows NT is being desupported by the end of this year, we are
planning to upgrade the OS to Windows 2000. Since 11.0.3 is not supported on
Windows 2000, we have to upgrade oracle applications too. We are planning to
upgrade
DBA's
We are trying to get an Oracle client running on OS/390 so CICS and (pro*COBOL) can
connect to a remote Oracle DB.
After install we are trying to run TNSPING as a first step to demonstrate something is
working, here is the error:
TNS-03506: Failed to create address binding
Any
rom v$process.
i checked the following::
$ps -ef | grep
oracle 21556 1 0 Feb 20 ?0:09 ora_snp3_TRADEDB1
isn't this the OS process/thread for the oracle background
process?
i want to kill the process at OS level if it is not working at DB
level
TIA
--
Please see the officia
.
i checked the following::
$ps -ef | grep
oracle 21556 1 0 Feb 20 ?0:09 ora_snp3_TRADEDB1
isn't this the OS process/thread for the oracle background
process?
i want to kill the process at OS level if it is not working at DB
level
TIA
--
Please see the official ORACLE-
t OID
that's what I know offhand.
Apologies for any typing mistakes I failed to notice.
Markus Reger
Oracle Applications DBA
Webmaster
MBC
University for Music and Performing Art
Vienna
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/16/03 06:13 AM >>>
Hi DBA's
Can somebo
Hi DBA's
Can somebody clarify the flwng:
DB: 9.x
OS: solaris 2.8
1.
To setup OS authentication we need to grant either
OSDBA or OSOPER to OS account( OS oracle a/c)?
so that we can connect to DB as
sqlplus / as sysdba
and we dont require a password file for this. is this
true ? or any
Anyone worked with the 9i developer's release for OS X 10.2?
--
Glenn Stauffer
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Glenn Stauffer
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, Calif
for win-os/2 I wonder.
B>> http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,767456,00.asp
BPJ> The reports of OS/2's death are somewhat exaggerated:
BPJ> http://www.russharvey.bc.ca/rhc/os2/ecs.html
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Robert Eskridge
Do they have to pay licensing fees to Microsoft for win-os/2 I wonder.
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)
Systems Admin & Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'inf
Another one bites the dust..
I had to make a presentation in the university about
the OS/2, in those times was amazing to format one
disk in the A: drive, other disk in the B: drive and
having many applications running, everything at the
same time! I finished my presentation saying "The
ex
Patrice,
Tuesday, December 17, 2002, 2:40:38 PM, you wrote:
B> http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,767456,00.asp
The reports of OS/2's death are somewhat exaggerated:
http://www.russharvey.bc.ca/rhc/os2/ecs.html
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,767456,00.asp
Regards,
Patrice Boivin
Systems Analyst (Oracle Certified DBA)
Systems Admin & Operations | Admin. et Exploit. des systèmes
Technology Services| Services technologiques
Informatics Branch | Direction de l'informatique
Maritimes R
On Thu, 5 Dec 2002, Bishop Lewis wrote:
> Shiva,
>
> Attached is an email from Ankur Shah from another posting - have not tried
> it myself but this may help.
>
> Lewis Bishop
> ---
The email was instructional but it's only good for Unix. There is
no equivalent for 'system()' in the Win32 world
]Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 10:10
AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: Are
There any way of calling NT OS Commands like print, del etc.
Hi Gurus
I am looking for easy of calling OS commands like print, del, etc. from
PL/SQL on a NT4 system running Oracle 8.1
To issue OS commands from PL/SQL for NT, there is no other option. Now if
your PL/SQL was an anonymous block then you could issue OS commands via SQL
Plus.
Otherwise , you will have to use C or Java.
RWB
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
INET
-L
Subject: Are There any way of
calling NT OS Commands like print, del etc.
This
header confirms that this email message has been swept for the
presence of computer viruses.
Corporate IT
THE WOOLWICH
--
Hi Gurus
I am lookin
Hi Gurus
I am looking for easy of calling OS commands like print, del, etc. from
PL/SQL on a NT4 system running Oracle 8.1.7. I tried the Java approach from
oracle web site, it works for few commands and not all.
Any insight, direction and help to achieve is very much appreciated.
Thanks in
"Tim Gorman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 5:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Oracle OS level security
>
>
> > On Thursday 28 November 2002 12:03, Tim Gorman wrote:
> > > My $0.02...
> > >
> > > Oracle9i provides the AUDIT_SYS_OPE
--- Jared Still <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 28 November 2002 03:53, O'Neill, Sean wrote:
>
> > We has a Standard Operating Procedure which states that whilst
> DBA's have a
> > access to data they will not change it. A recognition of the DBA's
> > capabilties but stating on paper co
the event logs. So now it would take at least 2 people to
> instigate a fraud. Hey this might foster even better relations between
> DBA's and SA's ;)
OS level audit trails won't track block level hacking, such as with BBED.
Jared
>
> Just my 2 cent worth :)
>
On Thursday 28 November 2002 12:03, Tim Gorman wrote:
> My $0.02...
>
> Oracle9i provides the AUDIT_SYS_OPERATIONS parameter, which will audit only
> to the OS audit trail. Thus, anything that SYSDBA does can be audited.
>
> The reason for the OS audit-trail only? Because SYSDB
My $0.02...
Oracle9i provides the AUDIT_SYS_OPERATIONS parameter, which will audit only
to the OS audit trail. Thus, anything that SYSDBA does can be audited.
The reason for the OS audit-trail only? Because SYSDBA can always erase a
DB audit trail (even if the act of erasure is still audited
mode]
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:40:24 -0800
>> Subject: Oracle OS level security
>>
>>Dear list,
>>
>>Let me toss a hypothetical situation at you.
etc. etc.
r had not changed financial information
> to benefit themselves, or to falsify financial records for the
> gain of the company.
>
> Not that they might have any proof that something like that
> had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not*
> been done.
>
> I&#x
th
> admin access to the server had not changed financial information
> to benefit themselves, or to falsify financial records for the
> gain of the company.
>
> Not that they might have any proof that something like that
> had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had
e that someone with
> admin access to the server had not changed financial information
> to benefit themselves, or to falsify financial records for the
> gain of the company.
>
> Not that they might have any proof that something like that
> had been done, but rather, just not proof
bit, and it seems to me that if someone had
good knowledge of both the OS and the
database (Oracle), as well as having admin rights on the server, there are
few things you can do to prevent such a person from changing data in the
database, and completely
covering his or her tracks.
The platforms i
rds for the
> gain of the company.
>
> Not that they might have any proof that something like that
> had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not*
> been done.
>
> I've been pondering this for a bit, and it seems to me that if
> someone had good knowledge
at they had no assurance that someone with
> admin access to the server had not changed financial information
> to benefit themselves, or to falsify financial records for the
> gain of the company.
>
> Not that they might have any proof that something like that
> had been done
e server had not changed financial information
to benefit themselves, or to falsify financial records for the
gain of the company.
Not that they might have any proof that something like that
had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not*
been done.
I've been pondering this for a b
ing like that
had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not* been done.
I've been pondering this for a bit, and it seems to me that if someone had
good knowledge of both the OS and the
database (Oracle), as well as having admin rights on the server, there are
few things you ca
0 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Oracle OS level security
>
>
> Let's face it. The SA's have all the privs in the world.
>
> Finally, with 9i, and connect internal going away, we can prevent
> unauthorized connections to the database to pr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/26/2002 04:09 PM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:RE: Oracle OS level security
Jared:
Any one with a reasonable knowledge of Oracl
My experience with NT security in an environment of any significant size is
that it is a hopeless situation. In addition to dealing with admins on the
box with the database, it seems that there is always an application support
person or two that needs to administrator privs on that box too. Then
it themselves, or to falsify financial records for the
> gain of the company.
>
> Not that they might have any proof that something like that
> had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not*
> been done.
>
> I've been pondering this for a bit, and it seems to m
ike that
had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not*
been done.
I've been pondering this for a bit, and it seems to me that if
someone had good knowledge of both the OS and the
database (Oracle), as well as having admin rights on the
server, there are few things you can do to pre
hanged financial information
to benefit themselves, or to falsify financial records for the
gain of the company.
Not that they might have any proof that something like that
had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not*
been done.
I've been pondering this for a bit, and it seems t
ves, or to falsify financial records for the
> gain of the company.
>
> Not that they might have any proof that something like that
> had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not*
> been done.
>
> I've been pondering this for a bit, and it seems to me that i
e company.
Not that they might have any proof that something like that
had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not* been done.
I've been pondering this for a bit, and it seems to me that if someone had good
knowledge of both the OS and the
database (Oracle), as well as hav
> admin access to the server had not changed financial information
> to benefit themselves, or to falsify financial records for the
> gain of the company.
>
> Not that they might have any proof that something like that
> had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not
financial records for the
gain of the company.
Not that they might have any proof that something like that
had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not*
been done.
I've been pondering this for a bit, and it seems to me that if
someone had good knowledge of both the OS and the
pondering this for a bit, and it seems to me that if
someone had good knowledge of both the OS and the
database (Oracle), as well as having admin rights on the
server, there are few things you can do to prevent such a person
from changing data in the database, and completely
covering his or he
rds for the
gain of the company.
Not that they might have any proof that something like that
had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not*
been done.
I've been pondering this for a bit, and it seems to me that if
someone had good knowledge of both the OS and the
database (Ora
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Oracle OS level security
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 19:28:42 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from newsfeed.cts.com ([209.68.248.164]) by
mc6-f19.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600);
]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: RE: Oracle OS level security
>Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:09:27 -0800
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>Received: from newsfeed.cts.com ([209.68.248.164]) by
>mc8-f17.law1.hotmail.com
What is BBED? I never heard of it.
From: "K Gopalakrishnan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: Oracle OS level security
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 16:09:27 -0800
MIME-Versi
lves, or to falsify financial records for the
> gain of the company.
>
> Not that they might have any proof that something like that
> had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not*
> been done.
>
> I've been pondering this for a bit, and it seems to me that
me that if
someone had good knowledge of both the OS and the
database (Oracle), as well as having admin rights on the
server, there are few things you can do to prevent such a person
from changing data in the database, and completely
covering his or her tracks.
The platforms in question
the
gain of the company.
Not that they might have any proof that something like that
had been done, but rather, just not proof that it had *not*
been done.
I've been pondering this for a bit, and it seems to me that if
someone had good knowledge of both the OS and the
database (Oracle), as
Folks,
Can someone direct me to a source of good information on this topic. Is there wor will there be Oracle client for OS X? Any leads are very much apreciated!
Thanks!Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now
Thanks, I'll give that a try.
Jared
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/31/2002 02:38 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: OS Authentication on Win2K
when
r 2002 19:10
> Aan: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Onderwerp:Re: OS Authentication on Win2K
>
> run:
>
> select username from dba_users
> where password = 'EXTERNAL'
>
> Is there a user that matches the currently logged on
> Win2k account?
>
nts of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:OS Authentication on Win2K
I am having problems getting OS authentication to work on a Win2K oracle
server (8.1.7.1.1).
All parameters are set properly (from what I can see). There cannot be a
prefix so the followin
I am having problems getting OS authentication to work on a Win2K oracle
server (8.1.7.1.1).
All parameters are set properly (from what I can see). There cannot be a
prefix so the following parameter is set as follows: os_authent_prefix = ""
I need to be able to log into the server
I have an Oracle Internet Directory server as the campus master LDAP
directory. I need to replicate the accounts and passwords to an Mac OS
10.2 Open Directory and an MS Active Directory. I can create accounts
using ldapadd/ldapmodify but can't get the passwords to work. Has anyone
1 - 100 of 231 matches
Mail list logo
