ple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Oracle 10i new releases
>
>
> Ha I remember Oracle 5 on VM. Ah the joys of minidisks. I
> started with Oracle on VMS in 1984, but I cannot recall the
> exact version. BI files, IOR, UFI, RPT and RPF, IAP and IAG
> when
Johnston, Tim [mailto:TJohnston@;quallaby.com]
> >>Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:49 PM
> >>To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> >>Subject: RE: Oracle 10i new releases
> >>
> >>
> >>Oh... I'm sure they are many other who bac
n
> >'89! I do know there are a few on this list that do go back farther than
> >that!
> >
> >John
> >
> >
> >
> >>-Original Message-
> >>From: Johnston, Tim [mailto:TJohnston@;quallaby.com]
> >>Sent: Fr
I remember 4.1.0 on Dos 3.3. :-)
Maks.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:root@;fatcity.com]On Behalf Of Joe Testa
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:04 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: Oracle 10i new releases
>
>
6.0.33 on VAX/VMS
5 on VAX/VMS
--- Joe Testa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> anyone remember the 6 days, 6.0.36 on sunos :)
>
> joe
>
>
> Mercadante, Thomas F wrote:
>
> >Robert,
> >
> >I guess what you say makes sense. But why the need to move the
> release
> >level from 8, to 8i, to 9i to 10
Ha I remember Oracle 5 on VM. Ah the joys of minidisks. I started with Oracle on VMS
in 1984, but I cannot recall the exact version. BI files, IOR, UFI, RPT and RPF, IAP
and IAG when IAP was completely text driven. I was Dba'ing before there was SQL*NET.
Back in those days one was the DBA
nston@;quallaby.com]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Oracle 10i new releases
Oh... I'm sure they are many other who back farther then
that... But, I do
remember 6.0.36... As a matter of fact it was 6.0.36.1.53 on
IBM VM.
2 2:49 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: Oracle 10i new releases
>
>
> Oh... I'm sure they are many other who back farther then
> that... But, I do
> remember 6.0.36... As a matter of fact it was 6.0.36.1.53 on
> IBM VM... Ah
> the m
Oh... I'm sure they are many other who back farther then that... But, I do
remember 6.0.36... As a matter of fact it was 6.0.36.1.53 on IBM VM... Ah
the memories...
Tim
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 4:04 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
anyone remembe
No, but I can remember 6.0.36 on HP-UX and 6.0.33 on HP-MPE. Still have the
tapes too.
Dick Goulet
Reply Separator
Author: Joe Testa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 11/8/2002 1:03 PM
anyone remember the 6 days, 6.0.36 on sunos :)
joe
Mercadante, Thomas
anyone remember the 6 days, 6.0.36 on sunos :)
joe
Mercadante, Thomas F wrote:
Robert,
I guess what you say makes sense. But why the need to move the release
level from 8, to 8i, to 9i to 10i all within 5 years? Granted, there were
huge improvements from 8 to 9i. I guess what I'm arguing f
Robert,
I guess what you say makes sense. But why the need to move the release
level from 8, to 8i, to 9i to 10i all within 5 years? Granted, there were
huge improvements from 8 to 9i. I guess what I'm arguing for is - lets stay
at 9i for awhile. There is nothing wrong with 9i release 1 thru 1
12 matches
Mail list logo
