One ought to be able to. We haven't tried, since we've been using mod_owa
www.sharemation.com/~dmcmahon/modowa.htm
, for historical reasons. Since it is working well for us
we haven't tried to replace it with mod_plsql.
One reason we went with our own Apache build was because Oracle's version of
My box too. Overblown marketing always makes the opportuity for cynical
humour irresistable. :-)
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:59 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Message
> as we all know Oracle is unbreakable, so security isn't an issue.
All of these
recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
Plain Old Database
Thanks Allan,
>
as we all know Oracle is unbreakable, so security isn't an
issue.
:-)
I
know mod perl and mod ssl but what's mod plsql? How is it used and why? Anyone
using it?
Thanks for all the replies. The reason I asked is because dbca calls some of these
items "Standard Database Features."
Steve - I think that the mod plsql is the module that let's you generate html using
PL/SQL (htp and htf pl/sql packages).
Jay
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/03 06:19PM >>>
Tha
protection and
ours, we must decline all legal responsibility for the validity of the
statements and comments given above.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-Von: Orr, Steve
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Gesendet: Freitag, 14. Februar 2003
00:20An: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LBetreff:
Message
> as we all know Oracle is unbreakable, so security isn't an issue.
All of these security alerts (see below) that just hit my mailbox must be
just mere formalities :-)
- Dale
http://www.DataBee.com
EMAIL from Oracle below
This e-mail is a critical technical al
AIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:46
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
Plain Old Database
The
Apache shipped with the Oracle database has mod perl, mod ssl, and mod
plsql installed into it, but is AFAIK a stock Apache distribution
otherwise. It i
as we all know Oracle is
unbreakable, so security isn't an issue.
Allan
-Original Message-From: Orr, Steve
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:34
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
Plain Old Database
I'm with you. Ora
Hey Ron,
We had the same problem with having to run catrep after a patch (and then
the .4 minipack) in 8.1.7 on HP. We really didn't *have* to run it, but it
would have left dozens of invalid SYS objects, so I chose to incur the
slight storage overhead of just running it.
Rich
Rich Jesse
Title: RE: Plain Old Database
I'm with you. Oracle behaves too much like Microsoft trying to get you install stuff whether you need it or not. I've come across a lot databases where the installer person installed stuff probably thinking, "I'm not sure if we'll ne
I install what I need and what I am licensed for.
not "in case someday"... besides, if it is not installed, the
developers have to make a case to management about why they want to use
it
--- Jay Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am preparing to migrate from 8.1.7 to 9.0.2. I was just
Jay,
I had a problem with a full export of a database because all of the
items were not present. They were not activated but the export script
expected the references to them to be present.
This is how the problem came about;
OS OpenVMS 7.3-1
Oracle 8.1.7 rel3
first instance created during oracle
Jay,
I agree with you. Too much crap.
The only thing I have begun leaving in is OUTLN. I drop every other user.
I figure that, if needed, I can install it later.
Tom Mercadante
Oracle Certified Professional
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 3:10 PM
To: Multiple rec
I am preparing to migrate from 8.1.7 to 9.0.2. I was just wondering if I am the
only DBA that doesn't like all of this other "stuff" in my database - Ultrasearch,
Intermedia, Oracle Text, and XML. I used dbca to generate my database creation
scripts, so I could understand what the tool is do
14 matches
Mail list logo