Re: Security, private vs. public synonyms and contention data di

2003-07-11 Thread Jared Still
y with that easily). > > Tanel. > > - Original Message - > From: Stephane Paquette > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:49 PM > Subject: RE: Security, private vs. public synonyms and contention data di > > > I t

Re: Security, private vs. public synonyms and contention data di

2003-07-11 Thread Tanel Poder
ld be used (of course in multi-schema environments you won't get away with that easily).   Tanel.   - Original Message - From: Stephane Paquette To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 10:49 PM Subject: RE: Security, private vs. pub

RE: Security, private vs. public synonyms and contention data di

2003-07-11 Thread Stephane Paquette
-LSubject: RE: Security, private vs. public synonyms and contention data di Question: Are private versus public synonyms preferred for security? Are private syn. worse administration? Do 1,000 users with private syn. cause data dictionary contention?

RE: Security, private vs. public synonyms and contention data di

2003-07-11 Thread Paula_Stankus
Title: RE: Security, private vs. public synonyms and contention data dictionary Question: Are private versus public synonyms preferred for security? Are private syn. worse administration? Do 1,000 users with private syn. cause data dictionary contention?