Thanks, Ray! Well, this is excellent!
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Stell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 12:09 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: Re: 9.2 on Red Hat 8.0
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 10:53:57
Cool. Now we can run Oracle on a Microsoft Xbox.
http://www.itworld.com/Comp/2362/021011xboxlinux/
Mark Stahlke
Denver Newspaper Agency
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:09 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Re: 9.2 on Red Hat 8.0
On
ne of the best of any os I've ever seen.
Alright, break times over!
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ray Stell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 12:19 PM
> > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > Subject: Re: 9.2
gt; Subject: Re: 9.2 on Red Hat 8.0
>
>
>
> I'm going to try mandrake 9.0, which came out this week, with
> some 8i and 9i
> this week. I'll post a followup. Mandrake is basically rh with a
> better installer, actually one of the best installers
> the reality is that RedHat 7.1 and 7.3 are the best
Is that a qualified opinion? ...based on your extensive experience and
thorough testing with SuSE? :-) Others would debate with you... there's
been a bit of discussion on this on the suse-oracle list:
http://lists.suse.com/archive/suse-oracle
I'm going to try mandrake 9.0, which came out this week, with some 8i and 9i
this week. I'll post a followup. Mandrake is basically rh with a
better installer, actually one of the best installers I've seen ever!
No ora support, just for fun.
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 07:43:40AM -0800, Bruce w
Oracle seems to change their "official" mind from time to time, but the reality is
that RedHat 7.1 and 7.3 are the best versions to run with Oracle. I've had absolutely
no problems with either version of the OS, and the installation and setup are well
documented (both by Oracle and third-party
System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA
> -Original Message-
> From: Orr, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:59 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> Subject: RE: 9.2
true officially, so i live on the bleeding edge when it comes to oracle :)
joe
Orr, Steve wrote:
>Oracle only supports RH 7.1, SLES-7, RH Advanced Server 2.1. Right?
>
>I understand Oracle is having problems supporting RH 7.1 but they won't
>admit it to the general public. So even "official" R
Oracle only supports RH 7.1, SLES-7, RH Advanced Server 2.1. Right?
I understand Oracle is having problems supporting RH 7.1 but they won't
admit it to the general public. So even "official" RH 7.1 support could be
risky. ;-) Any rumors?
On another note, I've heard that RH Advanced Server 2.1 do
Mladen, i've got a presentation in st louis on thu, probably this
weekend, i'll give it a whirl and let you know.
Joe
Gogala, Mladen wrote:
> Has anybody tried installing it? Any
> experiences/remarks/problems/rantings?
>
> Any RH 8.0 comments in general?
>
--
Please see the official ORA
Mladen, i've got a presentation in st louis on thu, probably this
weekend, i'll give it a whirl and let you know.
Joe
Gogala, Mladen wrote:
> Has anybody tried installing it? Any
> experiences/remarks/problems/rantings?
>
> Any RH 8.0 comments in general?
>
--
Please see the official ORA
12 matches
Mail list logo
