RE: 9ias Vs IIS

2001-11-29 Thread Boivin, Patrice J
l Message- From: Sunny Verghese [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:04 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject:RE: 9ias Vs IIS Thanks for you inputs. I'd like some concrete data on Security iss

RE: 9ias Vs IIS

2001-11-29 Thread Val_Gamerman/Victoria_Financial . VICTORIA_FINANCIAL
any State "managers" in this group :-) !!!) >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: 9ias Vs IIS >Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:00:26 -0800 > >I'm not a web expert either ... we&

RE: 9ias Vs IIS

2001-11-29 Thread Mark Leith
So which would you rather use? That's what all this boils down to.. Would you rather use a less secure (yes I *DO* believe it is less secure) larger target, or the alternative that is stable and less of a target? I know what my choice is.. -Original Message- Dimitrov Sent: 29 November 2

RE: 9ias Vs IIS

2001-11-29 Thread Peter . McLarty
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>         cc:                 Fax to:                 Subject:        RE: 9ias Vs IIS Thanks for you inputs. I'd like some concrete data on Security issues with IIS. Do you know of any sites for this ??? You know how it is, I can't just go to management and tell t

Re: 9ias Vs IIS

2001-11-29 Thread Marin Dimitrov
- Original Message - To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 13:26 >You never > hear much about security patches in Apache or OMNI HTTPD or some other web > server.. which does not mean they're more secure it just means that the

RE: 9ias Vs IIS

2001-11-29 Thread Mark Leith
PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: 9ias Vs IIS >Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 15:00:26 -0800 > >I'm not a web expert either ... we're just starting to look at web-enabling >our forms. >

Re: 9ias Vs IIS

2001-11-29 Thread Marin Dimitrov
- Original Message - To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 06:03 > Thanks for you inputs. > I'd like some concrete data on Security issues with IIS. Do you know of any > sites for this ??? You know how it is, I can't just go to

RE: 9ias Vs IIS

2001-11-28 Thread Sunny Verghese
I'm contracting with a state agency right now... you can imagine the managers there... No offense to any State "managers" in this group :-) !!!) >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

RE: 9ias Vs IIS

2001-11-28 Thread Val_Gamerman/Victoria_Financial . VICTORIA_FINANCIAL
Stick with Apache-TomCat -- JSP --> JDBC --> ORACLE simply because you have all the platforms you need for that. If the plan is to have the web stuff running on a separate box then you can still do Linux-Apache-TomCat or if they like Windows so much even then you can do Windows-Apache-TomCat,

RE: 9ias Vs IIS

2001-11-28 Thread schmoldt
I'm not a web expert either ... we're just starting to look at web-enabling our forms. But one big potential drawback to using IIS would be security issues. It's the most-targeted and most-hacked server out there. Someone will need to be applying patches constantly and hoping for the best. Ask

Re: 9ias Vs IIS

2001-11-28 Thread Regina Harter
We are uploading files into our database using pretty much the same setup they are proposing. It works quite well, and have yet to encounter a file it couldn't upload almost instantly, however I have my doubts about how secure it is. We have had no problems so far, but we are still in beta t