Re: Database Views

2002-01-20 Thread Jay Wade
If you can't use a DW idea look into Snapshots. If you don't need an up to the second view of the data that is. or schedule the report run time. Most reporting packages have the ability to do so. - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: Database Views

2002-01-17 Thread
Hello Srini We had a case like this where one of the tables was in a database that reside in a remote site. Our solution was to create a table that combine employees tables from 2 site into one TABLE in the local site. This way the select and join is done ONCE at night. Yechiel Adar, Mehish

RE: Database Views

2002-01-17 Thread Rachel Carmichael
that works as long as you can live with possibly inconsistent data in the joint table due to either 1) updates to the employee data on either site during the day not reflected in the joint table until the nightly processing is done 2) nightly process failing and data in the joint table either

Re: Database Views

2002-01-17 Thread Jared Still
This is why data marts were created. You would be much better off to create a reporting database based on the data you need to see. You won't be happy doing this with views from several databases. It won't perform well. As Rachel pointed out it will be inconsistent. At the very least you

RE: Database Views

2002-01-17 Thread
recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: Database Views that works as long as you can live with possibly inconsistent data in the joint table due to either 1) updates to the employee data on either site during the day not reflected in the joint table until the nightly processing is done 2

RE: Database Views

2002-01-17 Thread SRAJENDRAN
Thank you all for your opinions. The tables that I want to consolidate are 15 Million rows each. So five tables put together will constitute 75 million rows in one table. I will have to consider partitioning after that for optimum performance. Also Materialized view would take a long time to